Lechery, sir, it provokes, and unprovokes; it provokes the desire, but it takes away the performance…
Joined April 2009
- Tweets 74,017
- Following 2,110
- Followers 2,303
- Likes 1,073,189
18,317 Photos and videos
Matt 🐭 retweeted
I call it #Phintel
One big club.
Pharma - Intel agencies - DARPA - US military.
The 4th Reich.
@RMConservative @Fynnderella1 @chrismartenson
@DrJBhattacharya @RWMaloneMD
We have further proof that Dr. Fauci had deep connections to the intelligence agencies. When COVID-19 came about, he leveraged those connections to steer the intelligence community away from the idea that a lab leak took place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We now know a lab leak is likely what occurred.
washingtonexaminer.com/news/…
1
51
133
3,448
This.
Jun 12
【米上院証言】世界的腫瘍学者が、私の名を"実名で"挙げた ── スパイク蛋白とリンパ腫｜原口一博 youtu.be/u3dBhGOD7hg?si=pILQ… @YouTubeより 2026年6月12日20時プレミアム動画配信
こんばんは。原口一博です。今夜は、私自身に関わる、重い話をします。けれど、これは私一人の話ではありません。これからの、すべての人の、命に関わる話です。
一昨年の予算委員会で、私は、自らの病を、公表しました。悪性リンパ腫——びまん性大細胞型B細胞リンパ腫。そして、生検——組織を採って調べる検査で、私の体から、スパイク蛋白が検出された、と。
公表したとき、多くの誹謗が、私に浴びせられました。「政治家が、科学を装って、不安を煽っている」と。「陰謀論だ」と。私は、それでも、言い続けました。なぜなら、これは、私の体に、現実に起きたことだからです。
そして、先日。アメリカ合衆国の、上院の公聴会で。世界的な腫瘍学者——ブラウン大学癌センターの創設ディレクターであり、国際的ながん研究連合の議長を務める、ワフィク・エルデイリー博士が。私の名を、実名で、挙げて、証言しました。
博士は、こう述べた。「日本の元大臣・原口一博氏から、直接、連絡を受けた。彼は、びまん性大細胞型B細胞リンパ腫を発症し、扁桃に転移し、生検で、スパイク蛋白質が検出された。これらは、真剣な科学的調査を、要する」。
——おわかりでしょうか。これは、もはや、私一人の主張ではない。世界の最前線に立つ、がんの権威が、世界が注視する公の場で、口にしたのです。
ここで、私は、慎重に、申し上げねばなりません。私は、「ワクチンが、私のがんの原因だ」と、断定しているのではありません。エルデイリー博士も、断定はしていない。私たちが言っているのは、ただ一つ。「調べてくれ」ということです。スパイク蛋白が、なぜ、そこにあったのか。注射した場所の近くで、なぜ、頭頸部のがんや、リンパ腫が報告されているのか。因果を確かめるのは、科学の仕事です。
本当に、恐ろしいのは、何か。それは、ワクチンそのもの以上に、「調べること、問うこと、それ自体を、封じてしまう空気」です。疑うな。考えるな。ただ信じろ——その空気こそが、科学を殺し、人の命を危うくする。
私は、政治家として、そして、一人の患者として、これだけは、譲れません。国民の命に関わることは、たとえ、どれほど不都合でも、どれほど叩かれても、光の下で、徹底的に、調べる。それが、国家の、最低限の責任です。
私は、生きています。こうして、皆さんの前で、話しています。病と向き合いながら、それでも、問い続けています。
私が問い続けるのは、恨みからではありません。同じ苦しみを、これ以上、誰にも、味わってほしくないからです。とりわけ、これからを生きる、若い人たちに。子どもたちに。
真実を、見つめる勇気を。そして、問い続ける覚悟を。——私は、その先頭に、立ち続けます。
今夜も、ともに。ありがとうございました。
---
## ④ 概要欄（本文）
2026年、米国上院の公聴会で、世界的な腫瘍学者ワフィク・エルデイリー博士（ブラウン大学癌センター創設ディレクター）が、原口一博の名を実名で挙げて証言した。「びまん性大細胞型B細胞リンパ腫、扁桃への転移、生検でのスパイク蛋白検出——真剣な科学的調査を要する」。かねて自らの病を公表してきた原口一博の主張が、公の場で世界の権威に裏づけられた。因果の断定ではなく、「調べること」を封じない社会へ。原口一博が、一人の政治家として、一人の患者として語る。
※本動画は証言内容の紹介であり、特定の医療行為と疾病の因果を断定するものではありません。
#米上院証言 #スパイク蛋白 #エルデイリー博士 #原口一博 #真実の記録 #ゆうこく連合
［※末尾に公式フッターを付す］
---
7
10
208
Matt 🐭 retweeted
Jun 12
🚨 BREAKING: The Frontiers (Frontiers Media) Scandal Deepens — How Many COIs, and the Retractions That Followed, Were Caused by the Publisher Itself?
⚠️ The resignation of Michael Okun from Frontiers, where he has publicly exposed the publisher, raises a critical question that extends far beyond a single journal.
Frontiers' so-called "Research Integrity Department" has retracted numerous papers over alleged author-reviewer conflicts of interest.
But how many of those COIs were, in fact, created by the publisher itself?
If reviewer selection was being automated without adequate due diligence regarding expertise and potential conflicts—and if handling editors were being overridden or deprived of meaningful control—then a fundamental question must be asked:
❓ How many authors were accused, investigated, or sanctioned for reviewer-related COIs that originated from Frontiers' own reviewer assignment processes?
❓ How many retractions attributed to reviewer irregularities were, at least in part, the consequence of publisher-created conflicts rather than author misconduct?
This scandal also raises urgent questions for indexing organizations.
How much longer will @ClarivateAG @Clarivate @DrNandiQ, @Scopus, and @DOAJplus @kamelbelhamel continue to turn a blind eye to predatory publishers—such as @FrontiersIn, @MDPIOpenAccess, and @BenthamScienceP—while maintaining their indexing status and prestigious metrics such as Impact Factor and CiteScore?
⚠️ These metrics confer legitimacy, attract submissions, generate revenue, and enable the continued exploitation of researchers, reviewers, editors, and institutions.
When systemic failures in editorial oversight, reviewer vetting, conflict-of-interest management, and publisher governance become public, continued indexing is not neutrality—it is endorsement.
The academic community deserves an independent audit of all reviewer-related retractions and editorial practices at Frontiers.
🔱 @SciGuardians 🔱
Empowering the Academic Community
Jun 11
🚨 We warned about Frontiers’ predatory publishing model — now editorial resignation highlights systemic COI risks driven by the publisher’s own processes
Michael Okun has resigned as Associate Editor for Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience (@FrontNeurosci @FrontiersIn), alleging that automated systems are selecting peer reviewers without adequate checks for expertise or conflicts of interest, while also limiting meaningful editorial control over those decisions.
⚠️ These claims point to a structural conflict of interest embedded in the publisher’s workflow—where automation and platform design may override independent editorial judgment, including safeguards for expertise and COI screening.
📌🔱 We at @SciGuardians raised concerns about Frontiers’ predatory practices in May 2025: x.com/SciGuardians/status/19…
⚠️ Predatory publishers—such as @FrontiersIn, @MDPIOpenAccess, and @BenthamScienceP—are among the six plagues we have identified as corrupting academia, consistently contributing to the exploitation of members of the academic community and their disempowerment.
1
43
65
10,775
This.
Jun 11
Infanrix is the same. There were 42 sudden infant deaths reported in the TGA database.
blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/tg…
1
8
288
RT @aravindmohanoor: Third rate pharmacovigilance is definitely a "harm to the general interest" of the entire planet, which means everyone…
3
well, fuck me sideways!
Jun 11
Another vaccine failure!
This time it’s Merck hit with a $50M settlement they’ve agreed to pay out as a result of their Gardasil HPV vaccine causing premature menopause, seizures, POTS, POI and other autoimmune disorders.
I’m glad they were held accountable!
1
5
97
This.
Jun 9
🧵I asked Alter Statems AI to explain the connections between the gut, the immune system, and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Remember to always double check an AI for accuracy.
7
164
Yup, pretty much
Leaked files from around the world just proved that regulators lied to the public to push the vaccines and erased incriminating data.
This article covers it all, especially the leaked FDA conversation. It's time for justice.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/new-d…
4
91
This.
Jun 6
They needed you to believe that Lombardy was a disaster zone from a novel virus.
It was not.
@francescagino knew and refused to play ball with the narrative, so they took her out.
That's how the Boston pharma experts control over Harvard.
RICO.
@SenRonJohnson
@RetsefL
3
137
Matt 🐭 retweeted
My US Senate testimony:
El-Deiry's opening testimony at US Senate Hearing: COVID vaccines, cancer & Attacks on Pubs 6-3-2026
youtu.be/P6gRik_l6XU
US Senate Hearing with Dr. El-Deiry on Covid vaccines, cancer, & attacks 6-4-2026: Risks & attacks
youtu.be/Ca30TWb54Ms
US Senate Hearing on Covid vaccines, cancer, and attacks on 6-4-2026: ivermectin/mebendazole
youtu.be/2ZuHzxDCxdU
US Senate Hearing with Dr. El-Deiry on Covid vaccines, cancer, & attacks 6-4-2026; Spike in tumors
youtu.be/QE3_N_WDgsE
US Senate Hearing with Dr. El-Deiry on Covid vaccines, cancer, & attacks 6-4-2026: PubPeer Attacks
youtu.be/pdx2MsY_v7U
US Senate Hearing on Covid vaccines, cancer, and attacks on 6-4-2026 with Dr. El-Deiry
youtu.be/Oclw9ncFtpc
US Senate Hearing on Covid vaccines, cancer, & attacks 6-4-2026; consent, discourse, open-mindedness
youtu.be/WhxsKVzkcV8
4
79
142
8,504
Well damn
Jun 5
Horrible, yet nothing is being done. 😔Instead GAVI and the WHO are starting to push it harder in other countries. Budi in Indonesia and Modi in India have both made deals to push it
3
53
SkyNet, is that you? 😳
Jun 5
JUST IN: Anthropic has called for a global pause in AI development, warning that current models are approaching the ability to improve themselves without human oversight, according to the WSJ.
2
9
154
This.
Jun 5
The person giving testimony to @senronjohnson - @jrgralow - represents every #muttoncrew propagandist for pharma.
No idea what the COVID genetic vaccines did or how they worked, yet they forced you to take them.
You didn't care what side effects they had did you Julie?
openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/phy…
2
50
Yup, that is correct.
Nowak had a blood pressure of at least 90/60 to maintain speaking whilst sitting. Probably dropping to 80/50 when slurred.
Thats a sound blood pressure to start a resuscitation. @grok will confirm that in the ED you would expect, on balance, good results.
5
55
Matt 🐭 retweeted
The Cell paper from May, 2026 has a critical omission.
cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092…
Can you believe that in the human cohort they did not provide the COVID vaccination status of the people who developed or did not develop lung cancer??
Imagine that.
This is important because the cohort developed severe COVID related respiratory illness at a time when most people were vaccinated.
If the vast majority of those who became severely ill were vaccinated, you have to ask the question why they became so sick and are they representative of the general population.
I would say we do not understand why the vaccine didn’t prevent severe respiratory illness in those people.
I would say they do not represent the vast majority of individuals in the general population.
Instead of being dismissive, it is important to be honest and open about what we know and what we do not know.
Please tell me how the journal Cell published that paper with no mention of the COVID mRNA vaccination status of the human cohort.
I would add, and I have said this before, that the COVID mRNA vaccines increase PD-L1 expression in tumor cells.
Of course this makes the tumors more sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade.
But why not address PD-L1 some other way like epigenetic drugs, chemo or radiation, agents that actually have an anti-tumor effect.
Increasing PD-L1 by using agents that do not have an anti-tumor effect is by itself an immune evasion tumor promoting effect.
BTW, this is shown in the October, 2025 Nature paper whose discussion reads like marketing.
nature.com/articles/s41586-0…
Both NSCLC and melanoma respond to immune checkpoint therapy much better than other tumors with possible exception of MSI-high tumors.
Melanoma already has approved use of interferon therapy that is part of the COVID mRNA vaccine mechanism in that Nature paper.
Why not use IFN. Oh it’s because it’s pretty toxic.
The strategy suggested in the Nature paper has issues.
But, I did say it is OK to conduct clinical research with informed consent within a population that has very different risk:benefit considerations from the general population.
Oh, but we don’t have informed consent for the COVID mRNA vaccines as I said under oath a couple of days ago I don’t believe we have informed consent. x.com/humanspective/status/2…
Jun 5
World Renowned Oncologist says there’s no informed consent with mRNA tech, as the Nobel Prize winning Pseudouridine takes the stage.
The order looks backwards:
1. Inject billions.
2. Give them a Nobel Prize.
3. Publish a peer reviewed paper finding something unexpected.
@weldeiry - “It should be clear to everyone. Pseudouridine modified mRNA were used for the first time in the population... NEVER BEFORE.”
Months after Pseudouridine won the Nobel Prize, a peer reviewed paper was published saying this “upgraded” technology is leading to the production of “strange proteins in the body”.
Professor Clancy says: “No one knows what those proteins are doing”.
“The Nobel Prize in 2023 was given to two people for putting pseudouridine in a messenger RNA, to make it work better... within three months, a group in Cambridge found that 20% of readouts, and about 10% of people, had strange proteins circulating in their bodies, some of which have the capacity to form amyloid”
29
94
240
18,624
Matt 🐭 retweeted
Turbo Cancer & Suppression of Science x.com/i/broadcasts/1wxWjjyjd…
26
76
158
47,656
Matt 🐭 retweeted
Here is my opening testimony at the US Senate Hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson “Plausible Mechanisms of COVID-19 Injections Causing Cancer and Attacks on Scientific Publications and Research,” on June 3, 2026.
youtu.be/P6gRik_l6XU
45
429
889
141,048
Gaslighting again. Too bad you can cry wolf only once.
This is from BMJ.
It looks like Ebola deaths are a little worse than the last bad Ebola outbreak.
But if you check the linked sources the numbers are far lower.
6
53
Well it looks like an epidemic in progress
BREAKING: NIH ebola expert ARRESTED by the FBI for smuggling deadly pathogens into America from the Congo
Vincent Munster was BUSTED at an airport with 113 vials containing monkeypox, chickenpox, and human DNA.
93 of the vials haven't even been tested yet......
1
6
98