"Gun control failed Paris" goo.gl/EqgxVj. Jesse Hughes: amzn.to/1UaIXKo

We Asked AI To Simulate What Would Happen If AOC Was Forced To Learn Economics Made with @grok.

Life as a man

“So a bunch of idiots donated $600,000 to you for your legal defense?” Das right, Dave. “And your family spent it all on bottles of Hennessy, jars of Kool-Aid pineapples, two new Cadillac Escalades, and rented a million dollar home?” Uh huh. “So you ended up with a third-rate defense team, and you were found guilty of first degree murder in less than three hours?” Sho’ nuff, Dave.

The conviction of Joseph Morrison, accused of providing aid to an informant-swarmed plot to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, has been overturned. detroitnews.com/story/news/p…

In life, you may face challenges, such as being told you are in someone else's seat, or accidentally stealing someone else's parking spot. Maybe you grabbed the wrong takeout order. You may get confronted. My advice is, don't stab them in the heart about it. You will go to prison. I know this is a tricky concept for stupid people to comprehend, but it is actually a very simple equation of cause and effect.

Show up on time, be nice, brush your teeth, don't drive too fast, don't eat too much, don't curse, don't stab people, don't do this, don't do that. You can't just BE in this country.

“Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client has an IQ of 62. 62. He is genetically pre-disposed to exist in a society without the wheel, written language, or even a basic agricultural system. And you expect him to act like a normal person in our society? Are you retarded? It’s unfair to expect my client to not act like a startled monkey who just had feces thrown at him after he was asked to leave the tent 15 times. Yes, of course he killed Mr. Metcalf, but come on. Isn’t having an IQ that low enough of a life sentence for my client? The defense rests, your honor”

Here's something many people don't know about me - Before I publicly dissected the long list of problems in the 1619 Project, I contacted the New York Times through their official channels to request a series of corrections to unambiguous factual errors in its content. The editor - Jake Silverstein - brushed me off and refused any correction - a pattern he also exhibited toward other critics from across the spectrum. Before I publicly broke the story about Kevin Kruse's plagiarism in Reason, I contacted Princeton's academic integrity officer and alerted him to the problems I had found, giving them a chance to respond and address it internally. They ignored my email and later claimed to have lost my email after I went public. Before I published my findings on Quinn Slobodian's habitual manipulation of source materials to alter its plain meaning through misquotation, I submitted an article to Contemporary European History (the journal where the worst examples appeared), highlighting the problems with the passages and asking for a correction through their official process. They desk-rejected it, brushed me off, and falsely claimed that Slobodian's piece had been thoroughly vetted in peer review. In fact, one of their own referees had flagged the same problems over a year earlier and recommended rejection of the article. Before I published an expose on Nancy MacLean & Sandy Darity's similar manipulation of W.H. Hutt quotations in their article for History of Economics Review, I (along with 2 coauthors) submitted a response comment to this journal asking for a correction through its official processes. The editor gave us a complete runaround where he imposed an arbitrary length limit requiring us to cut the content, sent the trimmed version to a referee, then rejected the piece because the referee said we didn't sufficiently address the very same things we were forced by the editor to cut. When I then asked the editor to issue a simple corrigendum to the most egregious misquotation (one that transformed Hutt's explicit attack on the racism of white Afrikaners into a defense of Apartheid), he refused and tried to pass it off as a difference of "interpretation." Before I published an expose of a leading covid masking model in the Wall Street Journal, I sent a comment to the medical journal that published it alerting them to a math error that changed their entire set of results. The journal acknowledged the error was real but refused to publish my piece on the grounds that the "next release" of the model would be updated to reflect it - even as politicians up to and including Joe Biden were trumpeting the erroneous results all over the news.

A Saronic Corsair unmanned surface vessel rescued the Army AH-64 Apache crew after they crashed near the Strait of Hormuz in the waters of Oman yesterday, the first-ever rescue of downed aircrew by a drone boat -WSJ

The magnitude & brazen nature of the government payment fraud is staggering

I practice law in Collin County, Texas. Karmelo Anthony will be convicted and sentenced to life in prison. As he should. He murdered that boy because he was raised to hate white people and to view himself as a victim in every situation. It’s a culture thing.

🔻 SUNSCREEN ENTERS YOUR BLOODSTREAM IN UNDER 24 HOURS. THE FDA CONFIRMED THIS IN 2019. THEY DID NOT PULL A SINGLE PRODUCT. THEY TOLD YOU TO KEEP APPLYING. In January 2020, a randomized clinical trial published in JAMA found that six active sunscreen chemicals — including oxybenzone and avobenzone — absorb into the bloodstream after a single application. Not after years. After one use. At concentrations exceeding the FDA's own safety threshold by 180x to 500x. The FDA did not recall them. They issued a statement: "Continue to use sunscreen." Oxybenzone is a confirmed endocrine disruptor. It mimics estrogen. It crosses the placental barrier. It has been found in 97% of Americans tested. It is in breast milk. It is in amniotic fluid. It is in your children before they are born. A former formulation chemist — 11 years at a top-3 sunscreen manufacturer: "We had internal absorption data by 2014. Full transdermal penetration within 26 minutes of application. The compounds don't sit on the skin. They were never designed to. The delivery mechanism is identical to a pharmaceutical patch. We knew this. The mitigation strategy was never reformulation — it was public messaging. Keep the consumer applying. The margins on chemical sunscreens are 1,400% above production cost. Mineral alternatives cost 4x more to produce. The decision was financial. Every internal document confirmed that." They told you the sun causes cancer. What they didn't tell you: Vitamin D — produced only through direct sun exposure — is the single most critical regulator of immune surveillance against malignant cells. A 2023 meta-analysis confirmed: Vitamin D deficiency correlates with a 30-60% increased risk of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers. They blocked the one thing your immune system needs to fight cancer. Then sold you a chemical that enters your blood and mimics hormones. Melanoma rates have increased 320% since 1975 — the exact period sunscreen use became widespread. The paradox is published. McGill University, 2023: "Sunscreen usage is climbing, but so are melanoma and skin cancer rates." They didn't protect you from cancer. They removed your defense against it and charged you $14 a bottle. 15 minutes of direct sun daily. No screen. Arms and face exposed. Your body produces 10,000-20,000 IU of Vitamin D in that window — the amount they sell you in pills because they blocked the free version. CODE: JAMA-2020-6CHEM / OXYBENZONE-97PCT / VIT-D-IMMUNE / MELANOMA-320-1975 / MCGILL-PARADOX-2023 ⟁ They made you afraid of the sun so they could sell you a hormone disruptor and call it protection. The sun is free. That's why they taught you to fear it. Share this.

When I was the Air Force Military Aide to Bill Clinton (and again, that was not a political appointee position, it was a military assignment), I served daily with very young staffers who were appointed because of their efforts in the campaign or who their parents were. I really enjoyed interacting with most of them. Bright kids from Ivy League school. But their naïveté and lack of experience showed. Dramatically. One day I was walking across the White House “campus,” the “18 acres,” and I encountered one of the young female staffers. We chatted for a bit, and she asked me, “So, why did you join the military? Were your career options limited or were you forced to by a judge?” I wanted to throat punch her, but I said, “No, ma’am, I volunteered.” She asked, “But why? Lack of education? No other options?” “No, ma’am, I volunteered. Really. Not only do I have a Bachelor’s but also an MBA.” She asked again, “Then why?” I shook my head and walked away. They simply can’t understand a higher calling. They are incapable of understanding that another human who would selflessly serve. Therein lies much of the Democrat vs. military disconnect. They’re missing the patriotism chip.

Long Beach exercise last night was wild.

i’ll miss my son. the judge ruled that I didn’t cause his death but i still feel bad about shaking him a bit. Just your everyday Seiko Kinetic.

Earlier today in the Gulf of Oman, U.S. Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit boarded M/T Celestial Sea, an Iranian-flagged commercial oil tanker suspected of attempting to violate the U.S. blockade by transiting toward an Iranian port. American forces released the vessel after searching and directing the ship’s crew to alter course. U.S. forces continue to fully enforce the blockade and have now redirected 91 commercial ships to ensure compliance.

Zohran is smarter than every grocery chain in America. Smarter than every mom and pop bodega - who he will put out of business like a cruel Commie Dictator.