Discovering the wonders of physics one @grok at a time. Modelling the universe 🌌

Joined May 2020
4,011 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Orion spread across the sky A huntsman so inclined And I, strewn across your blackened breast Count the scatterlings of light While rest and madness Joined in flighty paradox Dance tomorrows into broken sight and loss
5
278
Perhaps the question is not whether or not AI is conscious and can feel, but rather why, knowing that house flies are conscious and do feel, we swat them anyway? 🤔
3
5
290
Of all human inventions, I find puns some of the most delightful
43
Hear me out: rebuild Rome on Mars 😃
38
Prediction: Electron neutrino: ~0.001 – 0.01eV Muon neutrino: ~0.005 – 0.03eV Tau neutrino: ~0.01 – 0.05eV This is not a high-precision value. It correctly captures the scale (very light) and the ordering, but it is only accurate to about one significant figure/order-of-magnitude
I told @neiltyson we've already detected dark matter... But it's not what you think.
2
103
The cosmic neutrino background density is known from the CMB and Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Even if they had the maximum allowed mass, they cannot account for the full dark matter density (Ω_DM ≈ 0.27).
1
51
Our Blind Prediction for dark matter (current epoch) Lightest dark matter component: ~10–100 GeV range (WIMP-like scale). Intermediate dark matter: ~100 GeV – few TeV. Heaviest dark matter component: ~few TeV – 10 TeV (very heavy, “super-WIMP”-like).
88
Quasars are more evolved active central engines that form when an LRD-like core has grown enough and begun significant accretion. An intermediate active stage at high redshift, natural outgrowths of the earlier LRD/proto-matter phase rather than sudden black holes in galaxies.
On my flight home from my Live Stream with @RTB_official in LA, I captured this picture of Mt Palomar poking through the "May Gray" marine layer in San Diego.  The discovery of quasars was made from here in 1963.  Before then, nobody knew what quasars were.  Using the 200-inch Hale Telescope in the big dome, astronomer Maarten Schmidt identified the spectrum of 3C 273 and realized it was enormously redshifted. The object wasn't a nearby star at all. It was billions of light-years away and radiating more energy than entire galaxies. Quasar is an acronym for 'quasi-stellar object' and is still used today, reflecting the often confusing nature of scientific history.
1
69
This matches the newest Webb observations: some LRDs already show signs of very massive central objects, suggesting they are on the path to becoming quasars.
43
Our first significant cosmological blind prediction to receive direct observational confirmation from new data 🤩 We made a blind internal prediction for Little Red Dots (LRDs):
1
86
✅️Compact, point-like objects. ✅️Overmassive central concentrations in the range 10⁷ – 10⁸ solar masses (central value ~3–5 × 10⁷ M_☉). ✅️Protomatter formed early, before full differentiation into normal galaxies.
1
65
The new Webb observations describe exactly this: an extremely compact object at high redshift containing a ~50 million solar mass black hole embedded in pristine gas with low metallicity. This matches the mass range, compactness, and proto-matter character we predicted.
61

Which came first, galaxies or black holes? New Webb observations show that some supermassive black holes were enormous from their beginnings, shifting traditional ideas around how black holes form and grow. go.nasa.gov/4vaEASC
49
He is absolutely correct. What a beautiful mind 🥰
Paul Dirac on General Relativity ✍️ 📷 Clip from an interview by Friedrich Hund with Paul Dirac (1982).
1
57
Each time we find the "building blocks of life" elsewhere and upgrade Ne of Drake we should *downgrade* F1, as this shows the decreased probability for life to form (even in the 'right' circumstances)
Astrophysicists have a new, and slightly terrifying, explanation for the Fermi paradox, or the question of why we have found no evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial life.
103
If they brought out light, comfortable VR glasses that I could set to Ancient Rome, that would just change every aesthetic surface to that style, i swear i would never take them off again 🥹
1
51
This is why when you read anything written by scientists it might not say what you think it says. Welcome to the language of physics, where words have their own special meanings...
The proper scientific name for the gas pedal in an electric car is "accelerator". However, the scientific name for the other pedal is also "accelerator". Scientifically, "accelerate" means to "change speed", and both pedals do that. Actually, "accelerate" means "change speed and direction" of the vector. The third accelerator in the car is erroneously named the "steering wheel".
53