I (embarrassingly) majored in "women's studies" in college and I can tell you firsthand, this is exactly the epistemic emptiness they teach you from day 1
Everything is "rooted in" something "systemic"
Systemic racism. Systemic oppression. Systemic harm
What’s missing (and what you see exposed when Peter starts asking basic questions) is that students are never even taught how to reason about systems. They’re not taught to define what a system is, what its components are, how those components interact, or how causality flows through it
In an actual systems framework, you would be expected to specify mechanisms: inputs, incentives, feedback loops, constraints, failure modes. You’d have to explain how a policy, law, or institution produces a measurable outcome, and why. You’d have to show at least some kind of work!
Instead, students are taught a style of communication that substitutes vocabulary for explanation. “Systemic” becomes a conversation stopper rather than a starting point. It signals moral seriousness while insulating the claim from scrutiny. If someone asks for clarification, that’s treated as hostility rather than curiosity
So when this kid confidently says “America is systemically racist” but cannot answer the simplest follow-up — what is the system, exactly? — it's not even really his fault
It’s the predictable result of a pedagogy that rewards moral fluency over analytical thought
They're really, really good at invoking the word “system” to explain everything, while explaining absolutely nothing
(For what it's worth: teaching myself about systems is how I thought my way out of feminism... and then eventually left the left. I cannot believe "women's studies" is a real academic program. It's bananas)
@peterboghossian encountered one of the most brainwashed students ever captured on camera. This perfectly illustrates the problem at the center of all of this