Contrary to what these six have claimed as their justification, there have been no “illegal orders” issued by President Trump. People saying it’s “unconstitutional” to stop narco-boats in international waters simply don’t know the law.
Under both U.S. law and international maritime law, the Coast Guard and Navy absolutely have the authority to interdict drug-smuggling vessels on the high seas. The Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act gives the United States jurisdiction over drug-running ships even when they aren’t American. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea allows any nation to stop stateless vessels engaged in piracy, slavery, or drug trafficking — and most narco-subs are stateless by design. U.S. courts, including the Supreme Court, have consistently upheld these authorities.
Bottom line: stopping narco-boats is completely legal, completely constitutional, and backed by decades of precedent.
They openly and publicly encouraged what amounts to a seditious insurrection in the military against the President of these United States — and President Trump simply reminded them of what the law actually says and what the legal consequences would be for violating it. He has done nothing wrong. They are the ones who crossed the line. He stated facts; they reacted because they know their own words cannot be defended. If they truly believed they had done nothing wrong, they wouldn’t be panicking now — and that alone speaks volumes.
And now they’re pretending their statements were merely an “innocent reminder” of duty. But they knew exactly what they were doing. They weren’t confused, and they weren’t naïve. They were laying rhetorical groundwork to justify mutiny or refusal of lawful orders if those orders came from a president they opposed.
They must be charged and tried for THIS:
x.com/Simo7809957085/status/…
So... can the U.S. legally “blow narco-subs out of the water”? Yes — and here’s why.
• Interdiction normally means stopping, boarding, and arresting — but lethal force is already lawful when a vessel refuses to stop or endangers life.
(14 U.S.C. § 522 — Coast Guard authority to use force)
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/…
• Stateless narco-subs have ZERO legal protections.
Under MDLEA (46 U.S.C. § 70502) and UNCLOS Article 110, stateless vessels involved in drug trafficking may be stopped, boarded, seized — and force may be escalated if they resist.
un.org/depts/los/convention_…
• If they flee, ram, resist, or pose a threat, the Coast Guard and Navy may lawfully use disabling fire — including sinking the vessel.
This is long-standing U.S. policy under Rules of Engagement, predating Trump by decades.
• President Trump argues that these vessels already endanger human life — not only by resisting interdiction, but by transporting drugs (like fentanyl) that kill thousands.
Under U.S. and international law, a vessel actively participating in lethal criminal activity is a threat, and officers may respond with proportional force.
• No court has ever ruled that sinking a hostile, stateless narco-sub resisting lawful boarding is illegal.
Courts consistently uphold U.S. jurisdiction and interdiction authority over stateless drug-smuggling vessels:
state.gov/wp-content/uploads…
• Bottom line:
If a stateless narco-sub refuses to stop, threatens U.S. personnel, or is carrying lethal drugs that endanger human life, the United States already has the legal authority to use lethal force — including sinking it.
This is not new, not controversial under the law, and predates President Trump.
---
If you like my posts, you're welcome to check out my writing as well as the MAGA music I create at:
#MAGA Music:
rumble.com/c/c-7799348
The Red Pill:
tatobin4.wixsite.com/theredp…
.