O političnih huliganih, pravniških akrobacijah na obzorju ter bitkah, ki jih je vredno biti (in tistih, ki jih ni).👇

And then he doesn't even show up to work! 😤

Because this is happening to Anthropic, the temptation for many will be to say: Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They have relentlessly raised the regulatory temperature in Washington by inviting far-reaching controls of frontier models. They made this bed and now they have to lay in it. But this decision by the Trump administration should not be judged on a desire for payback politics, but on the merits, and specifically what it means for America's broader AI objectives. In that regard, this action is truly outrageous. How exactly is the government planning on even going about verifying everyone who uses this specific model to ensure compliance? That alone raises huge flags. Between the latest Executive Order shifting more control to NSA, and the recent chatter about quasi-nationalization / equity stakes, and now this action, we are talking about a significant escalation in the politicization of AI and centralization of control over advanced computation in this country. And this is all being done by an administration that had previously made acceleration and winning the great AI race a priority. We're moving backwards now.

I cancelled my $10/mo Calendly subscription and vibe coded my own with Fable for $12,000

U.S. Gov running marketing for Anthropic

This says little about the risk posed by the capabilities of AI models and everything about the risk posed by centralized control over the access to AI models.

happens to the best of us

Trade Republic je poslal prijetno sporočilce, da bodo tudi obresti na tekočem računu 2,25%!

Recently, we purchased one of each Anthropic/OpenAI subscription plan and randomly ran long horizon coding tasks until we exhausted the weekly limit. It's widely believed that a $200/month plan maxes out at ~$2000/month worth of tokens (assuming API pricing). However, we found that the subscriptions are actually far more generous. (2/4)

Yes, it's kind of amazing how the socialist pitch shifted from "socialism will make you richer" to "socialism will make you poor, which is good because you deserve to be poor"

"We economists have done the math"

A reminder. We had a brief experience with degrowth in practice during the pandemic. The World was indeed greener, CO2 emissions went down for a while, wildlife flurished many-a-place etc. All it took was a radical reduction in standards of living and basic human liberties.

Here take a taste of the good stuff, on the house.

Meni se je tudi zdelo, da smo cel Golobov mandat gledali realizacijo ravno takšnih avtoritarnih praks, s katerimi se je vedno strašilo, da nas čakajo v JJ vladah, ja.

Uf tole bi bil lahko zelo velik seksizem in šovinizem. Ampak ne gre za poslanko Svobode, zato seveda ni.

I pick on Slobodian in the thread below as an egregious and recurring offender. But this sort of quote-editing by leftist scholars is *extremely* common in academia. Here's another by Nancy MacLean & Sandy Darity where they transform an attack on Apartheid into a defense of it.