Well since you ask^^
1) Popular science coverage of climate change is extremely weak on communicating the basics. How does the climate system even work, how do we know climate change is man-made, what are the observations, how do we make them, how do we analyse them etc.
Yeah, sounds boring. But I believe (and you may call me naive, but I believe it anyway) that many people who end up denying that climate change is man-made just don't understand the science. And as someone who has tried to understand it from what I've found online, I can't blame them.
It took several textbooks and a handful of patient climate scientists for me to wrap my head around the basics, and I have a PhD in physics to build on, so at least I know what a black body spectrum is and stuff.
In comparison to climate science, quantum mechanics is child's play.
2) Not entirely unrelated to the first, popular science coverage of climate science is often downplaying the uncertainties. Problem is, the uncertainties are often substantial. You'll find this acknowledged in the scientific literature. Not so much in the press.
It's possible that some of us will be lucky and things don't get as bad as expected. It's also very possible that the situation will get worse considerably faster than the IPCC projections make you suspect. (And indeed if you look at recent trends, well, have a look yourself.)
A good example of this are extreme weather attributions that will give you a probability for how much more likely this or that event was made by climate change. If you look at the papers, you'll find that these are almost always lower estimates for the increase. Ie, if they say an event was made 5 times more likely, it could be that it's become 5000 times more likely. You'd think that this could be communicated a bit more clearly, no?
3) Both of those taken together raise the unfortunate impression that the media is trying to hide something, which is fuel to the fire of those who are sceptical about the information they're being presented already.
Conclusion: Personally I think we need more apolitical coverage of climate science.
twitter.com/SackTheHack/stat…
Please elaborate why you think it’s communicated badly 🙏