Joined September 2018
455 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
6 Dec 2021
#Weidelknecht FanFic TikTok... bitteschön
2
2
11
Max retweeted
Well since you ask^^ 1) Popular science coverage of climate change is extremely weak on communicating the basics. How does the climate system even work, how do we know climate change is man-made, what are the observations, how do we make them, how do we analyse them etc. Yeah, sounds boring. But I believe (and you may call me naive, but I believe it anyway) that many people who end up denying that climate change is man-made just don't understand the science. And as someone who has tried to understand it from what I've found online, I can't blame them. It took several textbooks and a handful of patient climate scientists for me to wrap my head around the basics, and I have a PhD in physics to build on, so at least I know what a black body spectrum is and stuff. In comparison to climate science, quantum mechanics is child's play. 2) Not entirely unrelated to the first, popular science coverage of climate science is often downplaying the uncertainties. Problem is, the uncertainties are often substantial. You'll find this acknowledged in the scientific literature. Not so much in the press. It's possible that some of us will be lucky and things don't get as bad as expected. It's also very possible that the situation will get worse considerably faster than the IPCC projections make you suspect. (And indeed if you look at recent trends, well, have a look yourself.) A good example of this are extreme weather attributions that will give you a probability for how much more likely this or that event was made by climate change. If you look at the papers, you'll find that these are almost always lower estimates for the increase. Ie, if they say an event was made 5 times more likely, it could be that it's become 5000 times more likely. You'd think that this could be communicated a bit more clearly, no? 3) Both of those taken together raise the unfortunate impression that the media is trying to hide something, which is fuel to the fire of those who are sceptical about the information they're being presented already. Conclusion: Personally I think we need more apolitical coverage of climate science. twitter.com/SackTheHack/stat…

27 Sep 2023
Replying to @skdh
Please elaborate why you think it’s communicated badly 🙏
359
243
1,453
290,316
Max retweeted
20 Sep 2023
Perception check
1,130
31,762
124,936
10,486,551
Max retweeted
12
1,586
5,150
122,743
Max retweeted
A short film about why the dirtiest and most antisocial economic interests dominate our politics. I believe it's the key to understanding the terrible state we're in.

193
3,760
7,724
923,251
Max retweeted
16 Jul 2023
Für Soulfans gibt's auch noch ne Version. 😄
6
19
134
6,428
Max retweeted
16 Jul 2023
Das beste aus der Situation machen, geiler edit 😄
27
254
1,108
82,098
Max retweeted
5 Apr 2023
„Ich habe Angst davor, dass wir zu einer neoliberalen Politik kommen, dass ein @c_lindner sich durchsetzt. Wir müssen für unsere Kinder kämpfen & wenn wir sie heute nicht unterstützen, sind sie morgen für uns alle verloren.“ Arche-Sprecher Wolfgang Büscher🔥 #Kindergrundsicherung
40
170
887
62,522
Max retweeted
Replying to @hasanthehun
I mean
28
109
1,565
105,125
Max retweeted
Wissenschaft außerhalb der Komfortzone = destruktive Kräfte beim Namen nennen und sich hinter jene Aktivist*innen stellen, die echte Lösungen fordern. Danke dafür, dass ihr die Dringlichkeit des Problems besser vermittelt, als wir es mit Studien je konnten.derstandard.at/story/2000142…
14
65
246
41,351
Max retweeted
twitter hat jetzt endlich einfach zu merkende, leicht zu erkennende layout-anpassungen und verifizierungshaken eingeführt. falls sie die heutige nacht überstehen: hier ein überblick, wer jetzt was bekommt. thread:
87
603
2,853
514,234
Max retweeted
Das macht fassungslos. „Kinder sterben, weil wir sie nicht mehr versorgen können. Und das ist eine Aussage, die auch nicht zu widerlegen ist.“ @Karl_Lauterbach @MarcoBuschmann #Politikversagen
85
909
2,062
Die Tiroler Landwirtschaftskammer rastet aus, weil der Krampus (so was wie ein creepy Knecht Ruprecht in Ö.) in einem Werbespot Kaffee mit Hafermilch bestellt. Ernst gemeinte Reaktion: "...dass wir noch mal sensibel hinterfragen, wie wir mit dem Thema Hafer umgehen" 😂😂😂
Tirolerischer wird's nicht mehr: Die Landwirtschaftskammer kritisiert einen Spot der Tirolwerbung, weil darin jemand einen Latte Macchiato mit Hafermilch (und nicht Tiroler Kuhmilch!!!) bestellt. Die Tirolwerbung überarbeitet den Spot jetzt. Must watch.
23
27
327
Max retweeted
elon musk hates chomsky because he called out how corporations suck off the state's teet, taking no risk and stealing tech developed by public funding, then make record profits, avoid taxes and underpay workers. thread on how tesla is a case study of what chomsky describes here
159
6,073
20,541
Friedrich #Merz unterstellt der #Ampel die "Wortwahl extrem Rechter aus den USA" zu verwenden. Beispiele blieb der #CDU-Vorsitzende schuldig. Daher möchte ich einige Beispiele zeigen, wo die #Union bei Rechtsextremen abkupfert 1. #CSU klaut ihre Kampagne bei der Junge Freiheit
19
363
1,302
Max retweeted
Someone has to say it: Elon Musk has lied for 27 years about his credentials. He does not have a BS in Physics, or any technical field. Did not get into a PhD program. Dropped out in 1995 & was illegal. Later, investors quietly arranged a diploma - but not in science. 🧵1/
Community note
The University of Pennsylvania considers Musk to be a graduate of both the economics department and the physics department. "Elon Musk earned a B.A. in physics and a B.S. in economics from the University of Pennsylvania. The degrees were awarded on May 19, 1997." -Penn, 2019 snopes.com/fact-check/mus…
3,555
43,112
144,550
Max retweeted
Eines der Argumente der Gegner des #Buergergeld|s ist, dieses mache Betrug leichter und setze nicht ausreichend Anreize. Zur Einordnung, hier ein Vergleich des Schadens durch Betrug bei Steuerhinterziehung und Hartz IV — dies zeigt, wo in 🇩🇪 das sehr viel größere Problem liegt.
1,107
2,975
10,914
12 Nov 2022
Replying to @LegalEagle
@LegalEagle based on one of your latest videos: youtu.be/LxTWonQvXkw Let's say a big social media platform is requireing satire accounts to disclose in their name that its satire. And let's say one doesn't do that, would one be protected by the 1st amendment or would

1
12 Nov 2022
One be held accountable for hypothetically let's say tank stocks? I'm not an American so maybe I'm missing some "common knowledge" here, but could be interesting for some Americans out there to know. 😉
1
12 Nov 2022
Seems to happen lately