investor

Joined September 2011
1,614 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
28 Sep 2025

50
128
732
398,766
metadao will win
18
sacha retweeted
The cat is out of the bag. There’s no reason to step in to buy bitcoin until Saylor has been carried out back and all leverage/debts are cleared. Up to that point no amount of cash raise will save him. STRC is already dead btw, what institutions buy this credit instrument after such mismanagement and depeg?
1
1
10
793
it would be zero
question: if zkfg wasnt a metadao project, what do you think the zkfg token price would be right now? higher or lower?
2
6
173
sacha retweeted
I have also dmed few Time to build where things are actually happening MetaDAO
1
2
60
sacha retweeted
In this particular instance, Saylor probably should go to jail for egregiously marketing this as a no risk instrument. Also throw whichever intern made those AI ads into the slammer with him just for fun
$STRC wow the crazy thing is this was advertised towards families as being a safe, and better than a high yields savings account with low or no volatility. The fine print said otherwise, but i wonder if that type of marketing comes back to haunt saylor later
5
4
73
4,683
sacha retweeted
1929, the collapse of the Investment Trusts: By now it was also evident that the investment trusts, once considered a buttress of the high plateau and a built-in defense against collapse, were really a profound source of weakness. The leverage, of which people only a fortnight before had spoken so knowledgeably and even affectionately, was now fully in reverse. With remarkable celerity it removed all of the value from the common stock of a trust. As the price structure crumbled there was a sudden stampede to get out from under. Where were the big operators who had declared that they were still bullish? Where were the powerful bankers who were supposed to be able at any moment to support prices? There seemed to be no support whatever. Down, down, down. The roar of voices which rose from the floor of the Exchange had become a roar of panic. Operating companies at the end of the holding-company chain were forced by the crash to retrench. The subsequent collapse of these systems and also of the investment trusts effectively destroyed both the ability to borrow and the willingness to lend for investment. What have long looked like purely fiduciary effects were, in fact, quickly translated into declining orders and increasing unemployment. The stabilizing effects of the huge cash resources of the investment trusts had also proved a mirage. In the early autumn the cash and liquid resources of the investment trusts were large...But now, as reverse leverage did its work, investment trust managements were much more concerned over the collapse in the value of their own stock than in the adverse movements in the stock list as a whole… Under these circumstances, many of the trusts used their available cash in a desperate effort to support their own stock. However, there was a vast difference between buying one's stock now when the public wanted to sell and buying during the previous spring—as Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation had done—when the public wanted to buy and the resulting competition had sent prices higher and higher. Now the cash went out and the stock came in, and prices were either not perceptibly affected or not for long. What six months before had been a brilliant financial maneuver was now a form of fiscal self-immolation. In the last analysis, the purchase by a firm of its own stock is the exact opposite of the sale of stocks. It is by the sale of stock that firms ordinarily grow. However, none of this was immediately apparent. If one has been a financial genius, faith in one's genius does not dissolve at once. To the battered but unbowed genius, support of the stock of one's own company still seemed a bold, imaginative, and effective course. Indeed, it seemed the only alternative to slow but certain death. So to the extent that their cash resources allowed, the managements of the trusts chose faster, though equally certain death. They bought their own worthless stock. Men have been swindled by other men on many occasions. The autumn of 1929 was, perhaps, the first occasion when men succeeded on a large scale in swindling themselves.
5
5
35
2,972
metadao is internet capitalism. and on the internet you cannot ignore the importance of cults
The smartest discussions and the most important discussions of crypto community are happening on MetaDAO twitter. Ownership is going to be redefined from scratch; moving away from a capitalistic model to a community model; this is what crypto was supposed to be. MetaDAO community is prolly the smartest place to be right now; shape ownership forever.
1
9
445
CT still has a v poor understanding of what it takes to create a successful startup
4
24
1,276
sacha retweeted
The man has spoken
“You’re too early for us” Says the investor who’s job it is to invest in early stage companies
4
7
493
33,084
metadao
“Progress comes from action, not perfection.” — Reid Hoffman
2
9
539
metadao
Look for painters:
2
4
437
Si à 40 ans, une Italienne t’a jamais parlé comme ça, t’as raté ta vie.

447
1,135
16,799
1,803,527
sacha retweeted
theyll never be able to afford a nest
Comiendo aguacate en Iradzio, Michoacán 🇲🇽
77
6,949
93,613
1,170,907
“The government is too big. It’s too intrusive. It restricts what we can do. It’s becoming our master instead of our servant.” — Milton Friedman
25
462
1,520
62,213
sacha retweeted
This entire article glosses over the fact that no, in fact, this is not how any of this works, and it's like arguing that "if we strap a rocket booster to a school bus, the kids would have gotten to school faster instead of dying horribly if we could have just driven better".
Sam Bankman-Fried’s Venture Bets Would Have Made Him $100 Billion Richer Had He Stayed Out Of Prison forbes.com/sites/ninabambysh… (Photo: Michael M. Santiago via Getty Images)
7
4
52
6,530
sacha retweeted
I think you still need both, but the main lede is: technical founders now have access to business thinking Business founders now have access to technical thinking Net net: more startups that actually work, period
No one wants to admit this, but the Steve Wozniak / Steve Jobs era of "technical founder business founder" is over. For 40 years the model was the same. One founder builds. One founder sells. That split made sense when writing code took a CS degree and distribution took a budget. It doesn't anymore. AI killed the distance between technical and non-technical. Now only one role really matters: The fullstack founder. The person who can do all of it, with AI carrying the weight. Here's what that actually means in 2026: 1. You can build, even if you've never written code. Agentic coding tools turn plain English into real, shippable products. You describe what you want, it writes it, you keep iterating. "I'm not technical" stopped being a reason to go find a cofounder. 2. You can fill your pipeline without a sales team. AI GTM agents like GojiberryAI watch for buying signals, run the outreach, and book demos while you sleep. No scraping lists, no firing off 200 cold DMs by hand. You just show up to the calls that are already warm. 3. You can create demand, not just chase it. One good post on X, LinkedIn or TikTok can put your product in front of millions, for free. Distribution used to be a budget line you needed money to unlock. Now it's a skill you learn and run yourself. 4. You can actually sell. None of the above matters if you can't get a real person to say yes. Selling is still the one thing no tool does for you, and the founder who can build, market AND close has an edge nobody can compete with. We started as 3 founders. With AI covering the work that used to need whole departments, we hit $3M ARR and 2,000 customers in under 1 year. Each of us runs across product, outbound, content and sales. The founders winning today aren't the most technical. They're not the best marketers either. They're the ones who refused to pick a lane. You don't need a cofounder who completes you anymore. You need to become the whole stack.
46
36
405
37,846
"In frontier engineering, morale does not only come from mission. It comes from believing the company will survive long enough for impossible work to compound." "Put together marginally enough resources > buy engineering time > ship impossible progress > earn more credibility > unlock more resources > make the next impossible bet fundable"
Had a 4hr dinner with a SpaceX tech lead fren who joined in 2015. Gotta write down the hot take because it is very different from the usual “ @elonmusk is a tech visionary” story The less glorified employee perspective is actually more interesting: many core engineers did not stay locked in for 10 yrs purely because of “the vision.” As frontline operators, they often did not even know what concrete vision to believe in. Going to Mars 10 yrs ago sounded too delusional to be a real operating plan. My fren joked that it was more like “believing in the power of believing” lol What they did believe in was Elon’s ability to keep winning the next war chest: capital, debt, federal contracts, customer deposits, attention, narrative, most importantly market patience. That matters a lot more than outsiders realize, and ofc thanks to the big mom who keep all the shits together @Gwynne_Shotwell In frontier engineering, morale does not only come from mission. It comes from believing the company will survive long enough for impossible work to compound. Elon’s real genius may be that he turns capital formation into an engineering input. Put together marginally enough resources > buy engineering time > ship impossible progress > earn more credibility > unlock more resources > make the next impossible bet fundable This is why his companies keep forming silo network effects then Elon threaded them into a massive macro network effect - x com first - Tesla on earth physical traffic charging grid solar grid - Tesla FSD data network & edge compute network, which was a very underrated E2E track for AV (and most wouldnt bet on that track, ie Waymo spent massive money relying on lidar and HD map) - Starlink for connectivity first and now compute - Twitter/X for on earth digital traffic - xAi and Colossus compute network ... He also mentioned how X Money fills in the puzzle, which is not random, as the macro network now is looking for its own banking layer, all of which are high-stakes financial gambits that constantly need capital, debt capacity, payment rails, and balance-sheet engineering load. He has apparently hinted more than once that maybe spacex should just build a bank. The X Money card is still beta, but the perks are already wild: 6% APY and 3% cashback. Employees are extremely doped about it, not just for the perks, but because it makes them feel like first-class citizens of “Elon Nation.” and this might ignite another network effect that will connect them all and eventually evolve into a full bank. Tesla built the energy/data network. Starlink built the connectivity/orbital compute network. X built the attention/distribution network. xAI built the reasoning and inference network. X Money tries to close the financial network. Ya ofc Elon is one of the biggest "technology visionary" in our life time, but I increasingly think the he's the best network effect engineer on earth, which will get us to brute force out of earth itself. And the biggest network of all like @balajis has shared, is the network state. Welcome to Elon Nation
1
5
509
sacha retweeted
if @elonmusk paid 100% of his net worth ($1.4 trillion) as a tax it would only cover federal government spending for 77 days. this isn’t a tax problem…
If Elon Musk paid my ultra-millionaire wealth tax, we could pay for child care for all three and four year olds in America.
370
1,600
17,916
600,335
sacha retweeted
Meta HQ right now.
JUST IN: Meta’s CTO says morale is near “the worst it’s ever been” — leadership will offer increased snack budgets to lift spirits.
125
4,208
57,145
2,058,669
sacha retweeted
To be fair to Ackman this is actually the classic @matt_levine trade. @SpaceX is now a @elonmusk AI Treasury Company a la BTC. If Elon is a multiplier on the true value of AI assets, then what do you do? You keep selling stock and using it to buy AI assets. It's a great trade!
One of the things that makes @SpaceX so valuable is how valuable it is. The Cursor acquisition costs materially less in dilution because of SpaceX’s high valuation. SpaceX’s ability to do economically, strategically, and technologically accretive acquisitions is an important component of its value. There is enormous value inherent to a company with a high value particularly when it is controlled by an entrepreneur that the most talented people want to work for and partner with. Value begets value. Talent begets talent.
3
4
86
10,740