The Judge set a pretty interesting precedent in the Sorsby case. Part of Sorsby's argument was that the NCAA's hard and fast no-gambling rules are BS because of the close ties between college sports and Gambling companies.
The judge bought that, at least in part. That softens the argument for strict penalties for gambling on games, even games your team is playing in, as long as the NCAA maintains any type of relationship, even through broadcast partners, with gambling.
Essentially, this judge has said the NCAA can't really tell you not to gamble anymore, because they are making too much money off of it.
Now, that's not the entirety of the judge's reasoning, and this is just an injunction, but that certainly is an interesting development.