One Policy That Screwed American Workers: No Nationwide E-Verify Mandate Congress never made E-Verify mandatory for all employers despite decades of promises. This allowed companies to continue hiring illegal workers without fear of meaningful penalties and kept the underground labor market thriving. American workers in construction agriculture and service industries faced direct wage competition from unauthorized labor while employers saved on payroll taxes and benefits. The lack of a simple nationwide check continues to undermine legal workers every day. Bookmark it so you can show the receipts. Quote or repost your observation. Comment below if you have seen this in your town or industry. They Dont Work for You

After 31 years as a pedestrianized plaza, the famous car-free stretch in front of the White House has been converted into a parking lot.

All those China bulls are basically ignorant. The Chinese Government (including LGFVs and SOEs) have 300% debt to GDP. This is actually worse than it looks because China doesn’t write down bad debts, so GDP is significantly inflated. Chinese household debt to income is higher than that of US households. China is a paper tiger when it comes to economic might. In 20 years, with hindsight, people will see how foolish it was to think China would outgrow the US—just like the fools in the 80s with PhDs and Nobels who thought Japan and the Soviet Union would eclipse the US. These people are generally not serious thinkers. They don’t understand how the macroeconomy works and are living in fairy tales.

AUSTIN MAN pulled up to a 7-Eleven at 3 a.m., shot a father of five dead in the parking lot, and drove off. Caleb Jenkins now faces murder charges. But prosecutors had chances to stop him. November 2023: Jenkins, a convicted felon, was caught with a firearm. DA José Garza's office declined to prosecute. No charges filed. That same month: arrested for assault causing bodily injury/family violence. He skipped court. Bond was forfeited. Warrant issued. Re-arrested. Bond increased again. That case is still pending, two-plus years later. August 2024: caught with over four ounces of marijuana. DA declined again. No charges filed. October 2025: Quinton Arnold is dead in a 7-Eleven parking lot. Jenkins' record since 2012: • 3 gun charges — 2 days jail total • Felon caught with firearm — DA passed • 2 family violence assaults — dismissed or deferred • Protective order violation — dismissed • Multiple marijuana charges — dismissed or declined • Skipped court repeatedly across multiple cases A felon with a gun. Prosecutors said pass. Now there's a dead body.

They Don’t Work for You But DeSantis Does… and They Hate Him for It. Florida Fights Back Against Globalism Florida is thriving. Not by joining the globalist system, but by defying it. • #1 economy • #1 in education • Lowest illegal alien burden per capita • Actual border enforcement inside the state Why? Because Governor Ron DeSantis enforced the law. Driving an illegal alien is trafficking under Florida law even for carpool. Vehicle? Seized Employers? Massive fines No licenses for illegals No sanctuary cities Visa abuse? Targeted head-on DeSantis didn’t just talk tough-he built a system where illegal entry has consequences. And when globalist companies tried to flood the job market with cheap visa workers? > “We’ve got college grads who can’t get hired, because corporations want indentured labor from overseas.” – Gov. Ron DeSantis -2025 He called out the H-1B visa scam, and blocked it from becoming Florida law. He banned state contracts for firms abusing foreign labor loopholes. He revmoved H1B hiring by State Colleges. Florida vs the Globalist States • Teachers don’t have to instruct in 150 languages, they teach in English • Classrooms focus on learning, not translation • University of Florida: #1 public school in the U.S. – Why? Just 20% foreign enrollment – No flood of fake foreign master’s degrees – Priority: American students Compare that to other states collapsing under open border policies, foreign crime rings, and wage suppression. DeSantis proved America First governance works. Florida didn’t crumble. It became the model. They call it fascism. Because it’s not for sale. Bookmark. Share. Follow. Because in Florida, the government works for its citizens. But in most states… They Don’t Work for You @GovRonDeSantis @StephenM @ICEgov @USCIS Tag your Governor!

They Dont Work for You We say that all the time so folks ask... who do they work for anyways? The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has done more economic damage to American workers than most groups labeled "terrorist organizations" ever could. Yes - that is a fact and it is not stated lightly. The Chamber of Commerce works directly in concert with our foreign adversaries and hire politicians of both parties when they leave office too. Here is the explanation... Terrorist attacks cause sudden, tragic costs- billions in direct damage, lost lives, market shocks. But the Chamber's sustained lobbying for open trade with China, visa expansions, and offshoring-friendly policies helped fuel the China trade deficit that cost 3.7–3.8 million U.S. jobs from 2001 onward, mostly in manufacturing (2.8–2.9 million lost). Entire communities hollowed out, wages suppressed, factories shuttered-slow-bleed devastation that never makes headlines like a bombing. Ever wonder where those fancy DC houses with high price tags come from? Selling us out is profitable. The Chamber spent 72 million in lobbying in 2025 alone, partnering with WEF on "talent mobility" and advocating China ties through its China Center. They push policies that prioritize corporate profits and global access over domestic workers. Our politicians line up for hand outs from them like pigs for slop. One side gets cheap labor and market access. The other gets replaced. Is this "free enterprise" or institutional betrayal on a massive scale? If you have to think about that for too long then you aren't paying attention. Sources: Economic Policy Institute on China trade job losses; Coalition for a Prosperous America estimates; OpenSecrets Chamber lobbying 2025; U.S. Chamber China Center policy pages.

Stephen Miller rocks He’s one of the best staffers in White House history Repost if you agree that @StephenM deserves admiration and respect

Quick teaser before I drop the full bomb with receipts: Y'all know my series on why India's visa labor is the LAST place you'd want it from - fake creds, nepotism hiring, connections over competence, used as a corruption funnel... ? Well what about ... Offshoring whole ops there? Even worse nightmare. Big companies keep trying, keep failing HARDER over time. Projects? ~14% chance they actually succeed (bigger = bigger disaster). Manufacturing? 7-9% tops, good luck. Pharma giants flop repeatedly. Car lines, semi fabs? Total mess. Philips shifting more over there right now, watch the same story play out: culture clashes, insane turnover, fraud in processes, zero real credentials sticking. They 'make' stuff, sure, but it sucks, no top-tier wins anywhere. IBM barely scrapes by and even they're struggling. It's so bad that they will claim stuff made in India that they just turned around from China or Korea by slapping a sticker on it. Oh. And they can't sustain jack once they ship it. MBAs, CFOs, greedy boards chase cheap labor savings... ignore the mountains of evidence it's a money pit getting deeper. I'm going to step out on a Ledge and guarantee that there is no way you can be successful in a culture where they don't even have the ability to build Bridges that stand, water towers that stay up, or much less pick up the trash. Look most Indians won't even put their money in their own financial institutions because they don't trust them- not making this up. Full post coming soon with the why/how they fail every time. Buckle up, it's brutal. Drop your horror stories below if you've lived it. BTW- Grok checked all of this. Probably why this account is search banned right now because I keep bringing the facts. Here's the deal... The culture in India is- why pay to go to school when I could just pay for a degree? Why learn the material when I can just have AI do it?? Why apply directly to jobs when I can just kick back my pay and get any job I want through connections??

SCOTUS and the Trump Doctrine. Supreme Court is not merely tidying up a tariff statute; it is, in effect, ruling on the Trump Doctrine itself. The IEEPA tariffs case has become the vehicle through which the justices will decide whether a vision of economic sovereignty as national security is an acceptable constitutional operating system for the United States. From statutory skirmish to Trump doctrine test. What began as a dispute over the reach of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act now doubles as a referendum on whether control over trade flows, supply chains and capital should be treated as core elements of U.S. security, on par with tanks and treaties. The live question is no longer just whether IEEPA supports “reciprocal” tariffs; it is whether a permanent, crisis‑framed economic nationalism can sit comfortably inside the constitutional architecture. Why the delay. The delay is itself a form of judgment. By stretching out deliberations while leaving the tariff regime in place, the Court avoids being the proximate cause of market turmoil or diplomatic rupture, yet quietly preserves the very leverage the executive has built. The more time the justices spend hunting for a narrow, carefully hedged opinion, the clearer it becomes that they see this case not as a routine statutory correction but as a structural decision about how much economic firepower a president may wield in the name of security. Economic sovereignty as a constitutional value. The Trump Doctrine treats tariffs, export controls and investment restrictions as routine instruments of national defense rather than exceptional tools reserved for rare emergencies. A decision that preserves the core of IEEPA‑based tariffs, even while pruning procedures or tightening definitions, effectively elevates that logic from political program to constitutionally tolerated practice. If the Court accepts that Congress may delegate sweeping economic war‑powers to the president in the name of national security, it is blessing the underlying premise that economic sovereignty is itself a constitutional interest worthy of deference. Judicial caution as quiet endorsement? The Court’s caution, its reluctance to abruptly dismantle the tariff edifice or deliver a clean, hostile break—already functions as a form of quiet validation. By allowing the regime to persist while it searches for a narrow path, the Court signals that destabilising the executive’s economic leverage is a step it is unwilling to take lightly. That caution is not neutral; it tilts the field toward a world in which the fusion of trade and security is treated as a legitimate baseline rather than an aberration to be swiftly corrected. Likely outcome: trim, don’t topple? The most plausible outcome is a ruling that trims the edges without toppling the structure: tightening how emergencies are declared, policing some excesses, perhaps clipping the most aggressive readings of IEEPA, but ultimately leaving intact the president’s ability to weaponise access to the U.S. market. That kind of decision allows the Court to speak the language of restraint and separation of powers while, in practice, ratifying the central feature of the Trump Doctrine: that a president may run foreign policy through tariffs and financial coercion with broad legal shelter. The Trump Doctrine, judicially normalized. Once that line is drawn, the post‑war, rules‑based trading order is no longer merely eroded by executive practice; it is eclipsed by constitutional precedent. The old assumption, that multilateral tariff disciplines constrain Washington except in narrow, time‑bound emergencies, gives way to a hierarchy in which U.S. security claims and economic sovereignty sit at the top. In that hierarchy, the Trump Doctrine is no longer just a presidential preference disputed in think‑tank papers. It becomes a doctrine the Supreme Court has heard, weighed and, in crucial respects, allowed to stand.