If you are eating with politicians, just shut up don't tell us how we should conduct ourselves bwana. I have realized iko majamaa wanakula na gava but wanajifanya wako side yetu. Nyinyi ndio mnakula pesa ya kununua gloves.

You can do without nyanya, ni dopamine inatutawala. Buy that nyanya then eka kwa nyumba, after one week see how it looks like. Give it to the birds uone kama watakula. Farmers outside here spray nyanya inaiva overnight, asubuhi iko soko. No one will take care of your health, it's you alone.

Campos and Edwards both started talks with his camp after a few appearances of him cooking at Leipzig to be ahead of the rest. High conviction on small sample size. You must have a very robust belief system to act on small sample size.

Liverpool have to be very careful. Ngumoha pathway can’t be blocked or he’ll be gone. Personally would go for a cheaper runner type LW like Abde to rotate with Nguomha. And go huge on the RW (Diomande). Ekitike is another consideration as he can defo play LW well, with Isak 9.

Rūciü ni Thika. Kujeni na mbogi!

Tax experts have now warned that Kenya’s Finance Bill 2026 proposal that seeks to allow KRA to continue tax collection even during disputes could hurt businesses. They say it may strain cashflows and weaken taxpayer protections during appeals.

Let me explain to the public 1. On 18.5.26 the 3 Judge Bench issues Conservatory Orders✅ 2. On 4.6.26 the AG files a Rule 5(2)(b) at the CoA against the orders. ✅ 3. The Highlighting of Submissions on main Petition is set for 29.6.26 by the 3 Judge Bench at the HC✅ 4.Immediately the HC gave the date, the CoA serves a Notice of Hearing of the Rule 5(2)(b) application on the same 29.6.26✅ 5. On the Mn. of 9.6.26, the HC was asked to slot the Highlighting of 29.6.26 at 2:30pm, to avoid the clash since the CoA is in the morning.✅ 6. The Court of Appeal then shortly shares another Notice indicating the Hearing is 18.6.26 & not 29.6.26✅ @Kenyajudiciary @jsckenya Why is the Court of Appeal an Executive Court that is being orders ? How can a Judiciary expected of Stable Independence behave this way post 2010?

🚨 MISSING CHILD ALERT 🚨 Name: Mary Njeri Missing Since: This evening, June 11, 2026 Last Seen: Nyoro's Quarry, Imperial- Mzee Wanyama If you have any information or have seen her, please contact her father immediately: 0707 352 286 Please share widely bring Mary home safely!

Here is everything you need to know about the budget in simple terms. @Fortuneochako1 has shared details from the FY 2026/27 budget. Save the thread below:

This is not spending. This is looting.

State House spent unauthorised Ksh 2.5B within 6 weeks Spend per week Kes 416,666,666.67 Spend per Day Kes 59,523,809.52 Spend per hour Kes 2,480,158.73

If she is titrating sex, you have no choice. Just leave the relationship. Women really love sex, A LOT! Sex titration means she has lost desirability & views you as a burden. Bro, you will never flog a dead horse. Get out. Go pursue your purpose. #MasculinitySaturday

A court dealing with a Constitutional Question should never be occupied with the kind of Petitioner before it at the moment but rather the REM VALUE of its decision on parties yet to seek remedies in a similar manner beyond the decision. Such important factor is what the 3 Judge Bench did not have. They were more concerned about Rigathi Gachagua than the effect of their decision to the Future.✅💯

Bitok must be held responsible for all the schools that burned since the day he made this announcement! But, first of all, president @WilliamsRuto should remove him from government. As Moi once said (of Saitoti), "Urafiki ni tofauti na uongozi"!

A senior African government official who is known for corruption & finer things in life has acquired two sleek jets. These are T7-BBJ2 and T7-JET.

Bitok is one of the most incompetent PSs. From Immigration to Education and now transferring incompetence to Tourism. Nenyo emet.

Bitok seems to be incompetent. There were massive passports complaits when he was at Immigration. The Less said on his stint in education the better.

🇰🇪🇺🇸 Kenyan police are still clashing with protesters after firing tear gas and making arrests this morning over a U.S.-backed Ebola quarantine facility on a local air force base. 2 people were killed in demonstrations last week. The U.S. wants the site to house Americans exposed to Ebola in Congo and Uganda, keeping them off U.S. soil. Kenya's courts have twice ordered work to stop, but the U.S. kept building anyway. Source: Reuters / Writer: Julie

Yesterday's High Court judgment on the impeachment of H.E. Rigathi Gachagua raises serious and legitimate questions that our constitutional jurisprudence must grapple with honestly. The three-judge bench found that the Senate violated the former Deputy President's right to a fair hearing under Article 50 of the Constitution specifically by declining to grant an adjournment when he was unable to attend the proceedings. The court acknowledged that violation, issued a declaratory order and awarded Ksh.50 million in constitutional damages. Yet the bench ultimately upheld the impeachment itself. I respect the court and the constitutional role it plays. But I believe this outcome calls for serious reflection on the coherence of our remedial framework. The tension in the judgment lies in this, if the Senate's refusal to adjourn was a constitutional infirmity serious enough to warrant a finding of violation and a Ksh.50 million award, then the question that naturally follows is whether that infirmity was capable of tainting the entire removal process. The right to a fair hearing is not procedural decoration. It is a substantive constitutional guarantee, particularly in proceedings that result in the removal of a person from high public office. Courts must therefore grapple carefully with what it means to vindicate a right while simultaneously affirming the outcome that flowed from its violation. It is a difficult balance and I appreciate that the bench was navigating complicated constitutional terrain. It is instructive to recall the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the landmark 2017 presidential election petition delivered by the then Chief Justice David Maraga. The court, in a 4-2 majority, nullified the presidential election not on the basis that the outcome was necessarily wrong but on the basis that the process through which it was arrived at did not conform to the Constitution and the law. The court found that irregularities and illegalities in the transmission of results had compromised the integrity of the election and that the constitutional standard required more than a plausible result, it required a process that was itself constitutionally compliant. That principle that a flawed process cannot produce a constitutionally valid outcome remains a pillar of our public law. When we place that 2017 reasoning alongside yesterday's judgment, a legitimate concern emerges. Both cases involved constitutional violations in the course of a high-stakes removal or electoral process. In 2017, the violation of constitutional standards was sufficient to nullify the result entirely. Yesterday, a violation of the right to a fair hearing was found, remedied in damages but the result was preserved. These are not necessarily irreconcilable positions, courts do have discretion in fashioning remedies but the distinction must be clearly reasoned and transparently justified because the precedent being set will govern how future impeachments are conducted and how future courts respond to violations within those processes. My concern is about the precedent this decision may establish. If a constitutional violation during impeachment proceedings can be remedied by damages without disturbing the outcome, future Parliaments and Senates may not feel the full weight of their constitutional obligations when handling removal proceedings. The court itself noted the urgent need for Parliament to enact a dedicated statutory framework under Article 150 governing the removal of a Deputy President which is a legislative gap that should never have existed this long. That recommendation must not be ignored. A constitutional democracy is built on the integrity of its processes not merely its outcomes. We must ensure that the right to a fair hearing in Kenya remains substantive and not merely symbolic.

The Senegalese 🇸🇳 delegation gets this treatment on arrival in the USA. Full tarmac searches, shoes off, bags turned inside out like criminals. This is straight up humiliation and a disgrace. They’d never put white boys through the same.