PGY-3 IM Resident @ Zucker Hofstra/Northwell | Studying how cancer develops & how we intervene earlier | Views are my own.

Joined January 2026
Photos and videos
Promising signals across observational studies. Looking forward to seeing how the prospective data evolves.
I count 12 abstracts on GLP1s for cancer prevention at ASCO All of them are observational, and it's clear a proper randomized trial is needed here – two things on that 1. Lilly and Novo are not currently interested in doing it (thanks to @theglpman for helping to figure this out) 2. The first randomized trial is planned (called INSPIRE, from the ECOG-ACRIN research group) – for primary and secondary prevention of breast cancer in 11,000 overweight (non-obese) women, with a 5 year follow-up
1
26
Ashish Samaddar, MD retweeted
So proud of @SamaddarMD for spearheading this interesting project- compiling data from various sources and making complex comprehensive analyses to identify environmental risk factors for lung cancer coupled with an outstanding poster presentation (the prettiest in my opinion)
1
1
14
557
Ashish Samaddar, MD retweeted
⭐️ABSTRACT 8010: Air Pollution and Risk of Lung Cancer 📔The seminal 2023 @Nature paper showed a significant association in environmental particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and risk for #EGFR #NSCLC. 1⃣This large NCDB analysis (>1 million pts) suggests chronic PM₂.₅ exposure is associated with more advanced lung cancer findings 2⃣Key findings: - Each standard deviation increase in PM₂.₅ → ~5% higher odds of stage III/IV disease -In multipollutant models, PM₂.₅ remained significant (OR = 1.062, 95% CI: 1.047–1.076; p , 0.001), with combined pollution burden linked to a 3.1% increase in odds (95% CI: 1.5–4.7%; p , 0.001). 3⃣Caveats: -The study cannot distinguish if air pollution accelerates tumor progression (plausible) OR if air pollution here is linked with other determinants of care (smoking prevalence, occupational exposure, health care access) -No smoking pack year data? I understand the problems and recall biases associated with getting smoking level data, but seems like it would be important. -Ecologic exposure fallacy (county-level pollution ≠ individual exposure or risk) 📋KEY POINT: Emerging and ongoing population level data suggests link between air pollution and lung cancer risk. 😡RANT: We need more investment into these type of studies, to truly parse out these signals. This can only happen with funding. Sadly we are lacking vision, competence, and expertise from our elected officials and from our health care administration. (12/13) @lcsmchat @OncoAlert @OncLive @Lung_Cancers @Onco_Nexus @LungCancerRx @LungCancerEu @MedwatchKate @YoungLungCancer @DrCatharineY
1
14
30
4,165
Fascinating oral ASCO abstract asking a key question: how do environmental and lifestyle factors contribute to carcinogenesis? Interesting work exploring whether physiologic burden may be one pathway to early-onset cancers. asco.org/abstracts-presentat… #ASCO2026 @ravi_b_parikh

2
85
What environmental factors may contribute to lung cancer risk beyond smoking? Looking forward to presenting our #ASCO26 poster on ambient carbon tetrachloride exposure and lung cancer incidence in the U.S. Abstract: asco.org/abstracts-presentat… @NagashreeSeeth1 @NorthwellHealth

1
2
4
229
Ashish Samaddar, MD retweeted
The Gut Onc Lab happy hour at #GI26! Cheers to a great year of great science and collaborations. To many more 🥂 @deevyaparekh @GIMedOnc @TimothyJBrownMD @Deebacca @BRoseMDMPH @pjdisano
6
17
3,601