A climate science degree is a physics and math degree before it's anything else. The models you're mocking are built on the same fluid-dynamics and energy-balance equations that forecast your weekend. Graduates agree on the basics because the math keeps landing in the same place no matter who runs it. Calling quantitative training you can't follow "brainwashing" is a confession, not a critique.
Terms like “settled science”, “computer model projections”, and “conference negotiations” make up the
majority of curriculum for future climate science graduates. Smells like brainwashing to me!!!!