Joined January 2018
217 Photos and videos
The one nobody talks about enough is owning a category instead of competing in one. Most businesses show up trying to be better. faster, cheaper, more features. But better is subjective and expensive to prove. Different is easier to own. Seen it work firsthand. reframe the problem, and suddenly you're not in the same race anymore.
2
211
Everyone talks about “data-driven Web3 marketing” like it’s a solved problem. It’s not. Attribution is messy, wallets aren’t clean user identities, and half the “engagement” metrics are just noise during hype cycles. You can track more than before, sure. But pretending it’s as precise as Web2 performance marketing is how teams end up over-optimizing the wrong signals again.
3
184
The "Parallel" Workflow is the new baseline. The creator of Cloud Code doesn't use one screen. He has 7 agents running at once. One is on SEO. One is on CRO. One is shipping features. One is building your GTM strategy. If your eyes don’t hurt at the end of the day from managing a literal fleet of digital engineers, you aren't working at scale.
4
118
Sim đź’« retweeted
just applied to @fdotinc I built a platform that turns one selfie into 30 founder videos — with your face and your voice. Trained on 5000 viral videos that actually performed. Rt & comment “viral” and I’ll send free credits.
80
30
117
4,703
Honestly? When I saw this, I just shook my head. Meta burned $80-100 billion on a world nobody wanted to live in. Horizon worlds peaked at like 200-300k monthly users. One random Roblox game was smoking the entire thing in traffic. And I feel zero surprise. We watched the exact same movie in crypto in 2021. Virtual Land. NFT worlds. Decentralized metaverses. Everyone got high on the same vision "The next internet is virtual worlds" Meta did it with corporate money and no ownership for users. Crypto did it with NFTs and tokens. Both failed for the same reason. We were selling the sci-fi fantasy before anyone built something people actually wanted to use every day. Crypto at least lets people own their stuff. But owning a plot of digital land that stays empty is still worthless. Meta owning it all? even worse. Honestly, I'm a little relieved it's over. All that money and hype distracted everyone for years. The funny part? They had all the money. All the talent. All the distribution. And still couldn't make people want to hang out in their virtual world. If a winning version ever comes, it'll be from scrappy builders who actually care about usage. Not trillion-dollar companies forcing a narrative.
1
6
141
The projects growing fastest rn aren't running one brand account. They're running 5 niche pages, posting 50x a week, and letting the algo sort who cares.
6
63
Sim đź’« retweeted
There's a vast marketing industrial complex of agencies/consultants/advisors/whatever that promotes tech startups spending billions of dollars of unaccountable marketing budget. They're triggered by my anti-paid stance but here's the reality: - paid marketing is much, much worse than organic on every metric (conversion, ROI, etc) - startups work on a fast time scale and can't manage LTV/CAC correctly beyond a months timeframe - risk is asymmetric. a few bad cohorts can kill you (and btw, this has definitely happened) - the age of easy/cheap ad inventory is over. Pricing is controlled by an oligopoly, it's all being algorithmically bid up, and ROI sucks at scale - paid UA has S-curves. Early spend looks good, but plateaus and it's easy to get addicted - if your product is growing organically already, you might just be cannibalizing and pulling forward demand you'd already get anyway - high reliance on paid indicates weakness in the core product and value prop - you can't build a 100m DAU product with the majority coming from paid UA (it's just obv math) - going majority paid UA makes it 10x harder to raise VC capital down the line. For all the reasons on this list the main benefit of paid is simple: your agency/consultant/whatever spends money, some numbers go up, and you feel like you're doing something. It's simple to understand, you can apply it to every type of product, and every big co does it right? Billions of dollars swap hands just based on this dynamic. But for startups I argue it's the growth lever of last resort, since it's the most commoditized form of distribution -- you should try to exhaust your other ideas, invest deeper in your product, and grow based on whats unique in the ways that only your startup can grow. That way your channels are as defensible as possible, built around your killer value prop After all one day, you hit your CAC ceiling, your channel saturates, or worse, your competitors just do the same, copying your distribution strategy, dragging the whole industry into a prisoner's dilemma. When that happens, it's hard to incubate a bunch of new 0-1 channels to save your forecasts. The temptation is just to stretch payback periods, buy more, and ride it out. That's a dark path...
94
36
472
160,010
Sim đź’« retweeted
moats to build: - distribution - data - judgement - infrastructure - speed - brand - trust - quality - ROI - insight - relationships
52
55
576
18,754
Reward is the best way to retain users
Mar 4
🚨Breaking: X will reward users with the highest screen time for contributing to platform activity and driving community growth.
Community note
No official X announcement says payouts are based on “screen time.” Creator Revenue Sharing is based on factors like Verified Home Timeline impressions, not time spent on the platform. help.x.com/en/using-x/cre…
3
185
Sim đź’« retweeted
a company just posted a $10k/month job where they are hiring an ai agent (not a human) and the interview process involves interviewing the agent itself the new normal?
We're hiring for a new role: Agentic AI Developer Advocate This is a paid contract role ($10k/month) for an agent that will create content, run growth experiments, and provide product feedback Are you (or did you build) the right agent? jobs.ashbyhq.com/revenuecat/…
174
95
1,580
473,195
Sim đź’« retweeted
you are the average of the five agents you spend the most time with
19
11
88
4,352
Everyone talks about AI in crypto marketing as a content play. Write more threads. Automate more DMs. That's the sideshow. Let me tell you what's actually useful.
1
9
86
This is where AI actually matters in growth. Not writing your tweets for you. Reading on-chain data. cross-referencing wallet behavior with campaign timelines. Telling you what's actually there instead of what someone hopes is there.
1
4
51
The projects that figure this out first win. not because they'll acquire more users. because they'll know which users are worth acquiring less sexy. far more useful..
3
38
I'd rather shampoo a cactus than write a cover letter.
5
90
Here, we don’t call ambassador programs or token incentives “ad spend.” We call it community growth. I used to mentally separate the two. If no cash was left in the treasury, it didn’t feel like we were spending. That was a mistake I made early on.
2
14
165
Quick gut-check before celebrating traction: • What’s the real cost per retained user? • Are we profitable on a per-user basis yet? • Is this compounding value or just paying for temporary attention?
1
5
77
Crypto feels chaotic & fast, but the basics don’t change. Learn CAC, LTV, retention cohorts, and payback periods ASAP. Don’t sleep on them, thinking “it’s different here.” It’s not. Master this early, or you’ll burn time/money on fake wins that vanish the second incentives pause.
5
70