Cry cry cry....

We don't want any toxic comments. Repeating mainstream narratives and media is a form of ignorance. We invite you to save your comments on our page, and it would be more appropriate to comment on pages that support the terrorist state of Israel. Note: Many people have said that disabling the archive site will erase the scandals of the Israeli occupation. We clarified in our responses to the first, second and third questions who is responsible, and all the information and the truth have become loud and clear. However, at the same time, there are always backups and copies, and there are hundreds of sites, cameras and journalists who have recorded the crimes and atrocities of the occupation. Believe me, the Israeli occupation does not need evidence to be considered a criminal. In fact, the horrible truth has surfaced after the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, and due to the ongoing crimes since 1948, following the massacre in Lydd. We will provide more information, just stay tuned and watch this space.

The Internet Archive vs. The Internet Archive This is not a theory or a hypothesis; it’s the bare truth. There is no organization or group to which the responsibility for the data breach has been attributed, but mark our words, in the days to come, an organization will emerge from thin air claiming responsibility to cover up the crimes against its people. We will not be the coverup that terrorist organizations or the IA rely on to mask their filth. Since its inception, the archive has faced numerous international and governmental issues. If you benefit from the archive, that’s your business but we’re here to clarify the real picture. Whenever the archive confronts a case related to copyright and production restrictions, it creates drama to obscure its actions. For example, in 2013, a fire broke out in San Francisco while the archive was dealing with financial issues related to copyright and data, and the surveillance cameras were turned off, leaving the perpetrator unknown. After the COVID crisis, the archive seized books, films, songs, and games without regard for the owner's rights, violating Section 17 of U.S. law and Section 108 regarding the restrictions imposed on the exclusive reproduction rights. On June 1st, 2020, four major publishing houses— Hachette Book Group, Penguin Random House, HarperCollins, and John Wiley— filed a lawsuit against the Internet Archive in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claiming that the Internet Archive’s regulated digital lending practices constitute copyright infringement. On March 25th, 2023, the court ruled in favor of the publishers. The negotiated ruling issued on August 11, 2023, prohibited the Internet Archive from lending books for which electronic copies are sold digitally. On August 11th, 2023, the major music companies Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Concord (along with their subsidiaries Capitol Records, Arista Records, and CMGI Recorded Music Assets) also filed a lawsuit against the Internet Archive in the same federal court in New York regarding the archive's Great 78 project, demanding $621 million in damages for alleged copyright infringement. The archive was supposed to be a reference for information, but the site has started to resemble piracy sites. Frankly, we are astonished, as the picture has become clear: The archive is officially responsible for this circus they created to escape from lawsuits and financial crimes. Do you want a job with us, Brewster Kahle? All the information mentioned above can be verified through Wikipedia and Twitter, and all events are recorded on Google. You yourself can do the research and confirm everything. theregister.com/2024/09/05/a… jurist.org/news/2024/09/us-f… theregister.com/2024/09/05/a… ...

@Cyberknow20 @DarkWebInformer