This Reform UK stunt is tasteless, counterproductive, and morally repugnant.
Jimmy Savile wasn't just a "bad guy" or a political opponent. He was a prolific, sadistic serial sex abuser who preyed on hundreds of vulnerable children and adults over decades, enabled by institutions and politicians that looked the other way.
Using him as a punchline reduces one of Britain's worst scandals to a cheap gotcha. That's not edgy; it's grotesque and desensitising.
Victims' advocates have rightly called out similar weaponisations of his name in politics as disturbing.
It also undermines legitimate criticism. Labour has real failures that deserve sharp attack from across the political spectrum, as does Reform.
Comparing the party to Savile doesn't illuminate those issues; it poisons the well and gives Labour’s defenders an easy out to dismiss critics as cranks. Effective opposition highlights specifics (policy records, hypocrisy, outcomes), not cartoonish hyperbole.
In the tight Makerfield by-election where Reform is positioning as the serious alternative to Labour in the Red Wall, this hands opponents perfect ammo to paint the whole campaign as unhinged.
Robert Kenyon already faces scrutiny over past sexist/abortion/Russia posts. Shock value rallies the already-convinced but repels swing voters who just want competence.
It fits a pattern of an escalating rhetorical arms races. We've seen previous equivalents (e.g., false Savile smears against Starmer in 2022).
When everyone treats politics like a troll war, trust collapses further. Public discourse suffers. Democracy suffers. Britain suffers.
This should not be normalised. Free speech protects the right to hold up dumb signs, even vile ones. No one should face arrest or cancellation for this (barring direct incitement).
Campaigners can criticise Labour - I have, often. But we shouldn't just shrug and treat invoking child rapists as standard banter. That's a race to the bottom that makes society coarser, not freer or truer.
Healthy politics has guardrails of basic decency, not enforced by law, but by social norms, judgment, and electoral consequences.
Hyperbole has limits; some historical monsters (Hitler, Savile, etc.) aren't reusable props without cost. The goal should be sharper arguments, better candidates, and accountability, not who can be more shocking.
Reform supporters smirking and leaning into this kind of thing risks confirming critics' caricature of them as grotesque insensitive protest clowns who thrive on fearmongering, scapegoating, and unhinged rhetoric.
Reform UK’s Councillor Gemma Painter here endorsing the “I would rather vote for Jimmy Savile” message in
#Makerfield as she campaigns for
@RobKenyonReform.
Gemma is Kenyon’s fellow councillor on
@WiganCouncil.
She also works for an estate agent that lets HMOs, despite campaigning against them.