Joined March 2011
- Tweets 22,294
- Following 763
- Followers 301
- Likes 11,748
1,776 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Apr 29
Parents
if you don't want your kid to be on social media before the age of 16...
what was stopping you from enforcing this in your own household? Are you not the absolute authority in your home?
Why do you need the government to parent in your stead?
Genuine question.
1
1
6
920
The Professor retweeted
Jun 13
Err, thanks for telling everyone you didn't watch Bond films...
Did you not see Moonraker? Hugo Drax literally presents himself as a forward-thinking benefactor advancing humanity's future.
Die Another Day? Gustav Graves is a generous, high profile business man donating to good causes and living large.
Tomorrow Never Dies? Elliot Carver is an influential media mogul.
Fking retard.
1
6
315
Jun 13
"eLoN mUsK bECaMe ThE fIrST trILlIoNaIrE g3t w0Ke my peeps"
This was always going to happen at some point, stupid bint. Someone was going to be the first to hit a trillion. Just like someone at some point became the first billionaire.
They won't be the last.
Jun 12
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. This needs to be a wake up call.
39
The Professor retweeted
Jun 11
2
55
1,260
The Professor retweeted
Jun 10
its a shame we cant have adult conversations about the state of society when libs are in the room playing “ur a meanie poopoohead” toddler politics
330
1,790
41,849
321,459
The Professor retweeted
“I never thought I’d live to see the day when the right wing would become the cool ones giving the middle finger to the establishment, and the left wing becoming the snivelling self-righteous twats, going around shaming everyone.”
- John Lydon, The Sex Pistols
922
19,642
95,159
1,303,533
Jun 11
If anyone needs supporting evidence:
Article 10 paragraph 2 of the UK human rights act literally states that freedom of speech can be restricted for random reasons.
No new laws need to be voted and codified to make certain currently legal speech, illegal.
Jun 11
The UK government spyware demand means that the government decides exactly what should be censored on every mobile device. They say they will start with nude pictures (if you don’t identify yourself as an adult). But it could at any time be expanded to anything the government disapproves of. Today, 30 people are arrested every day in the United Kingdom for writing something online that the government classifies as "grossly offensive". It is obvious that they will use this tool to restrict free speech.
Currently, there appears to be no requirement to report findings outside the device. However, with both legal and technological decision-making power taken away from individuals and transferred to the government, that is only a pen stroke away.
This means that the government could also use this system for total mass surveillance.
And they can do so in secret.
The government recently, in secret, tried to pressure Apple (which is now agreeing to client-side scanning) to build backdoors into its end-to-end encrypted cloud service. They can do this under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, also known as the "Snoopers' Charter" – a law that makes it illegal for tech companies to disclose secret demands from the government.
88
Jun 11
The UK doesn't have a 'Brandenburg test' like the US does which helps determine whether certain speech was directed to inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce it.
In the UK, you're inciting violence and hatred if the prosecutor says you are.
There is no legal standard or test to protect speech that didn't incite lawless action.
Put this in context of UK HRA 1998 art 10 paragraph 2, freedom of speech does not exist in the UK
Jun 10
Those who use social media to incite violence and disorder are breaking the law.
Next week we will lay in Parliament an update to the Online Safety Act requiring services to take quicker action to remove illegal content circulating during times of crisis.
29
The Professor retweeted
Jun 10
As a Japanese watching the UK right now, I have one simple question.
A Sudanese asylum seeker just tried to behead a local man in Belfast. The victim lost an eye.
This comes after years of grooming gangs raping thousands of British girls — gangs that police and councils deliberately ignored because they were afraid of being called racist.
In Japan, even one case like this would have triggered national outrage and immediate policy reversal.
But in Britain, the conversation is still about “not being far-right.”
British people, at what point does protecting your own children become more important than protecting your reputation?
We genuinely do not understand this.
3,543
18,746
96,465
1,478,443
Jun 11
liamhalligan.substack.com/p/…
"Leading economists" are finally facing the reality of the UK's fiscal situation – but is it too late?"
Yikes.
16
Jun 10
People when near-trillionaire takes a holiday: "Why don't these people spend their time on fixing stuff the price of his one holiday could've fed 3 billion people!"
People when near-trillionaire tries to fix stuff: "why doesn't he just take a holiday and stop interfering?"
Jun 9
On me demande pourquoi l'homme le plus riche du monde Elon Musk, passe ses journées dans une guerre culturelle au lieu de profiter de ses milliards sur une plage.
La réponse est dans le post ci-dessous.
71
The Professor retweeted
May 23
Forza Horizon 6 is a participation trophy simulator.
God forbid you put in a bit of time and effort in order to get an achievement/trophy/car/other reward.
Nah everything for the cheap dopamine rushes.
Neither is being an adult burning hours every day grinding a video game
9
1
20
3,240
The Professor retweeted
Jun 10
sure the beheading in the street stuff is bad but you know whats worse? being called racist online. so be quiet
393
3,196
59,922
697,953
The Professor retweeted
Jun 10
This is Corporate Socialist control
Can you see it now?
Jun 9
This is what the UK spyware proposal means.
There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.
When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).
The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.
Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.
Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.
The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.
The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.
@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2053…
Statement from @signalapp
x.com/signalapp/status/20640…
@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
reclaimthenet.org/starmer-ca…
The government announcement:
gov.uk/government/news/new-p…
17
91
294
6,107
The Professor retweeted
Jun 10
"Eat the rich"
"And we hate the rich"
Yet this clown shows off how better she is been the rich.
43
96
1,858
27,321
The Professor retweeted
According to the UK government, you’re considered a terrorist if you believe that Western culture is under threat from mass migration.
Yes, this is really on their website.
644
6,141
27,036
541,260
The Professor retweeted
Jun 9
This is what the UK spyware proposal means.
There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.
When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).
The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.
Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.
Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.
The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.
The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.
@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
x.com/GrapheneOS/status/2053…
Statement from @signalapp
x.com/signalapp/status/20640…
@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
reclaimthenet.org/starmer-ca…
The government announcement:
gov.uk/government/news/new-p…
Jun 8
Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.
signal.org/blog/pdfs/2026-06…
241
3,405
14,182
1,515,980
Jun 9
x.com/scaleyback246/status/2…
You're still out here putting on display your terribly poor reading comprehension and apparently being ignorant to the fact IPs can be 'residential' or 'datacentre'.
VPNs to residential IPs are extremely hard to detect and block.
17
The Professor retweeted
Jun 8
Jun 8
Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.
signal.org/blog/pdfs/2026-06…
19
670
3,112
47,609