The recent Moonshots podcast was aggressively advocating government's involvement in the redistribution of capital to citizens.
Assuming that government involvement in the allocation of capital (proxy for goods and services) is net beneficial for the population of a country would be contrary to every lesson throughout history.
UBE/ UBI will not be a solution for abundance.
You could argue we have had abundance in the USA for decades and monetary debasement has completely destroyed the ability to save, which is ultimately the only way that an individual would benefit from continued productivity increase from capital.
Bitcoin (money) is a global index for productivity as reflected in decreased price and increased purchasing power.
Printing and redistributing shares in revenue generating companies does not solve the problem of 7% annualized M2 growth.
Cash needs a yield >7% ($STRC)
Capital needs to be fixed, in order to own a portion of the future productivity of the world (Bitcoin, i.e. 21M).
Energy-secured monetary policy is the only "fair system" to store and preserve the economic energy for individual entities, with artificial or human.
@Saylor is right on this one.
@MasonFoard and I presented on this exact topic at
@Strategy world in 2026. We will do a video recorded version of this presentation.