> be 24yo Cornell kid > some guy hounds you for 3 interviews you finally say nah I’m good > later find out the guy, @EinhornGabe, is Jewish > tell him your experiences with jews haven’t been great > guy immediately doxxes you, leaks your full name and email has your personal life investigated all over one comment > tags Bill Ackman drags in Palantir co-founder hands the whole thing to the media > jew York Post runs a full article “antisemitic college kid refuses to work for jews” > pure victimhood porn > proven right in minutes > all this because a goy said no thanks to working for jews > the pattern recognizes itself > the goyim know

🚨 Dr. Stacey Patton, a professor at Howard University, wrote an article in which she blamed Austin Metcalf – and his family – for Karmelo Anthony's decision to murder him. Titled "Dear Jeff Metcalf: Your Son is Dead Because You Failed to Teach Him That Black Boys Have Boundaries," the article argues that Jeff Metcalf failed to teach Austin that "black children have boundaries." In other words, Jeff should have taught Austin that black people will try to kill you if you ask them to stop violating social norms. While Patton falls short of outright defending Karmelo's decision, the entire purpose of the piece is to rationalize his behavior. Kind of like "Sure Karmelo shouldn't have stabbed him, but it was Austin's fault at the end of the day." She writes, "We have to talk about Austin's decision to approach and confront." As if Austin didn't have the right to tell someone from another school to leave his school's tent. As if somehow that minor confrontation justifies stabbing him in the heart. It is complete insanity. Patton ties Austin's behavior to "a long cultural tradition of policing black bodies and space." Right. Patton's Substack has nearly 50k followers. He has 300k followers on Facebook. She is an accomplished professor and journalist. The article received thousands of likes. We've all seen the low-class black people causing a scene outside of the courthouse. But it appears that even many educated blacks believe that people of their race have the right to murder anyone who asks them to stop playing music in public, respect physical boundaries, and so on. "Let us do what we want or we'll kill you" appears to be the message being broadcast by a sizable share of the black community. You don't have to be a far-right radical to recognize the many unsettling implications this holds for the future of American race relations.

The new Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh is jewish and the son-in-law of the chair of the world jewish Congress. Ronald didn't start Este Lauder of course, he's just another nepo baby. In 1998, he was asked by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to begin Track II negotiations with Syrian leader Hafez al-Assad; these negotiations continued after the election of Ehud Barak to the post. Ehud Barak met Jeffrey Epstein 20 to 30 times.

It's really hard to overstate how dystopian and weird Northern Ireland Twitter is. There are no opposition voices. There's only one side. On everything. Everything, and I do mean EVERYTHING is Pro Native Eradication. Post after post. Day after day. Nobody is actually listening to any of the natives impacted by any of these things, the only people who are shown any degree of empathy are foreign born invaders. Only then does their own government seem to care. If you could read the comments I have on my own posts, it'd horrify you. Over there their government is not only out to get them, it TELLS THEM they're out to get them and it tells them there's nothing they can do about it. Any actual opposition you'll see is all below the comment line, and because of this the Northern Ireland Twitter Politicos will just turn off comments. For some of them it's almost standard at this point. In Northern Ireland their votes don't matter, their voices don't matter, their history doesn't matter. And if you object to getting decapitated by some Sudanese psychopath a small army of women just like this one will pop up shrieking. I've never seen anything like it, it's like Northern Ireland's media is functionally identical to North Korea's but made up entirely of Karens. x.com/TreenieCurran/status/2…

With Tulsi Gabbard's new revelations about US bio labs in many countries around the world including Ukraine, it's fascinating recall the bizarre series of events that gave rise to this controversy in the first place: In May of 2022, some of us began asking whether the US had bio labs in Ukraine, what they were for, and why the US had them there. For asking those questions, we were instantly branded as "pro-Russian conspiracy theorists" in official Ukrainian intel reports, on our Wikipedia pages, by countless media outlets, etc. This was and remains one of the most bizarre episodes I've ever seen. Before May 2022, when we asked those questions, barely anyone had ever thought about let alone asked about "bio weapons in Ukraine"! I certainly hadn't. Like most people, I had never mentioned a word about it because it had never occurred to me we had them there. But then, Marco Rubio summoned Victoria Nuland to the Senate and asked her in a televised hearing under oath about these "rumors," clearly expecting her to immediately debunk them as obvious Kremlin lies and to proclaim the US had no such bio labs in Ukraine. Instead, Nuland did the opposite! She *confirmed* key aspects of these "rumors," and she explicitly warned that the US has several "bio research labs" in Ukraine that are so dangerous that they must not be allowed to fall into Russia's hands. When some of us heard Nuland's rather shocking admission -- the first-ever disclosure about these labs -- we of course asked: wait! what? Why does the US have bio labs in Ukraine, and what are the US and Ukraine doing in those labs that make them (in Nuland's eyes) so dangerous?? (Note: nobody ever suggested that the presence of these bio labs in Ukraine justified the Russian invasion; we just wanted answers about these US bio labs that Nuland had casually divulged). We never got real answers. We got smear campaigns. To this day, our names are formally attached to claims that we spread "conspiracy theories" for asking about these labs even though it was Victoria Nuland herself who was the one who accidentally revealed them for the first time in a Senate hearing in response to a shocked Marco Rubio. They then quickly tried shutting down any questioning by pretending that Nuland never said this, and it was just a bunch of paid Kremlin mouthpieces who were spreading lies. You see the same tactics now being against Tulsi for releasing this new intelligence report. Watch the Nuland testimony in question:

Jew gangsters and their sycophants often mock anti-Semites who aspire to be professionals by telling them no Jew will ever hire them. This principled man openly accepted that “penalty” and now Jews want to punish him further. This is because Jews do not want “respectable” Gentile co-workers, they want Gentile slaves.

🇷🇺🇺🇸 Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, who exposed the US funding of biolabs across Ukraine and Africa. He was assassinated at his home by Ukraine on the directive of western intelligence in December, 2024.

Friendly reminder that “Israel” has had a death-grip on the throat of American Politics for the last 70 years, at least.

¿Por qué fue tan importante el año 70 d. C.? En este año, las cuatro legiones romanas al mando del general Tito (eventualmente César), tras tres años y medio de asedio, finalmente lograron atravesar las murallas de Jerusalén y arrasar por completo la antigua ciudad. Según el historiador judío Josefo, testigo ocular de esta devastación total: – "Ninguna otra ciudad sufrió jamás tales miserias, ni época alguna engendró una generación más malvada que nuestra nación, desde el principio del mundo" (Guerra 5.442). Era imposible caminar por las calles de Jerusalén sin pisotear cadáveres. El templo judío fue profanado y luego reducido a cenizas. El antiguo orden levítico aniquilado y todos los registros genealógicos se perdieron para nunca más encontrase. ¿Por qué es esto importante? Sencillo: porque con la pérdida de los registros del templo y la dispersión del pequeño remanente entre las naciones gentiles, ya no era posible rastrear ni probar la ascendencia israelita. Con el tiempo, todos los antiguos judaitas se mezclaron con las diversas naciones gentiles donde se establecieron; en suma, NADIE —absolutamente NADIE— que hoy diga ser «judío» puede probar que proviene de la tribu de Judá o de los lomos de Abraham. Los judíos modernos no son los antiguos israelitas; la mayoría ni siquiera son semitas, sino jafetitas, que durante la Edad Media se judaizaron, es decir, abrazaron la religión de los fariseos, que sobrevivió con la codificación del Talmud. La moderna «nación judía» es un espectro, un fraude, una mala imitación. Sin templo. Sin sacerdocio levítico. Sin monarquía davídica. Gentiles disfrazados de judíos, pretendiendo revivir una nación que, por decreto divino, quedó totalmente desolada. Sin duda, las palabras de Jesús de Nazaret se cumplieron: – "Porque sobre ti vendrán días, cuando tus enemigos echarán terraplén delante de ti, te sitiarán y te acosarán por todas partes. Y te derribarán a tierra, y a tus hijos dentro de ti, y no dejarán en ti piedra sobre piedra, porque no conociste el tiempo de tu visitación" (Lucas 21:43-44). No se dejen engañar por el moderno estado de Israel: no es el cumplimiento profético de Dios; por el contrario, es el último intento de satanás para engañar a las naciones del mundo. Entienda quien pueda ...

Truth is treason in an empire of lies. - Ron Paul

Elon is not the problem… There are 193 countries in the world and 177 of them receive US taxpayer money from Congress. 177 of 193. Thats 91.7% of the world. Its not Congress’s money. Its your money, my money, our kid’s money etc. Americans are being screwed. Not by Elon…

IAN CARROLL: “UFC is owned by Ari Emanuel, son of Benjamin Emanuel—an actual Israeli terrorist. His IMG agency supplied models to Epstein’s Jean-Luc Brunel.” Trump’s WH 250th anniversary event is sponsored by literal Israeli terrorists and Epstein associates.

Republicans are in charge because we promised: to Make America Healthy Again. to start No New Wars, to put people above corporations, to put America above foreign countries, to release the Epstein files, to not spy on citizens, to eliminate fraud, what the hell happened?!

is that them getting into their BMW?

Ashkenazis maintain strong influence in narrative-shaping fields like academia, media, Hollywood, and government. When people notice the clear statistical overrepresentation in these areas compared to their small share of the population, the response is swift dismissal. Criticism gets labeled as conspiracy theory or antisemitism right away. This tactic works by framing any pattern recognition as irrational hate rather than data-driven observation. It shifts focus from facts about group outcomes, IQ advantages, networking, and historical strategies to the supposed bigotry of the observer. Public figures, organizations, and commentators trained in these circles repeat the line that noticing equals dangerous myth-making, protecting the status quo without addressing the imbalances. In academia and media, the main strategies involve gatekeeping and narrative enforcement. Faculty hiring, tenure decisions, and editorial boards often favor in-group preferences that sustain high representation. When outsiders point this out, responses include blacklisting speakers, canceling events, or running hit pieces that paint critics as extremists. Media outlets under significant Ashkenazi leadership amplify stories that equate demographic awareness with violence or Nazism. This creates a chilling effect where honest discussion of influence in curriculum design, news slant, or cultural output gets buried under accusations. The goal is to keep the public from connecting overrepresentation to real effects on policy, education content, and information flow. Hollywood and government follow similar patterns of control through alliances and pressure. Studios and production companies with heavy Ashkenazi executive presence shape films and shows that promote universalism while avoiding topics that highlight ethnic power dynamics. In government, lobbying groups push for favorable appointments and policies, then denounce scrutiny as dual-loyalty tropes. Noticing here gets dismissed by claiming Jews succeed purely on merit while ignoring coordinated advocacy and exclusion of rivals. Tactics include donor influence on politicians, rapid mobilization of aligned journalists, and cultural campaigns that normalize the dismissal. This maintains access to levers of soft power without open debate on whether such concentration serves host populations fairly. Laws play a growing role in censoring critical speech. In many Western countries, Ashkenazi-led organizations lobby for expanded hate speech statutes and antisemitism definitions that treat statistical noticing or historical pattern discussion as illegal discrimination. Examples include European laws jailing people for certain writings or the push for online content moderation codes in the US and elsewhere. While full First Amendment protections still limit outright bans in America, private platforms and institutional policies enforce de facto censorship through deplatforming and financial penalties. These legal tools extend the fight by reclassifying uncomfortable truths as threats to public order, forcing critics into self-censorship or fringe spaces. Overall, these efforts form a multi-layered defense of narrative dominance. Strategies blend social ostracism, economic pressure, institutional capture, and selective legalism to equate pattern recognition with conspiracy thinking. The result keeps most White populations from openly questioning why small-group cohesion yields outsized control in key institutions. This approach succeeds because it exploits host societies' individualism and free-speech traditions while using tribal solidarity internally. It does not require every individual to participate but relies on aligned networks that treat exposure as existential risk, ensuring continued advantages in shaping culture, policy, and public perception.

Starmers Britain and he’s proud of this ?

Elon Musk: "I think we're going to see widespread slaughter in Europe." "You're clearly seeing a massive increase in the number of attacks." "And the legacy media downplays these attacks. But the attacks, the terrorism, the killing of innocent people is rising. Every week, there's more."

$500 per vote. That’s what the Israeli lobby spent to beat me, and they still couldn’t do it with factual ads, or even fake ads based on policy. They ran with personal lies and AI videos to convince elderly voters I was sleeping with Ilhan Omar and AOC at the same time.

The Ukraine biolab story has completed its journey: "Conspiracy theory" → "Russian disinformation" → "Fact-checked" → Official government disclosure. For years, anyone asking questions was smeared and censored. Now the intelligence community itself acknowledges a vast US-funded biolab network.