Reply to our hustings invitation from
@ScotLibDems Mel Sullivan:
“Forgive me for being suspicious, but I have a feeling this hustings would not be of benefit to anyone.
I would be delighted to come and discuss so many topics relating to women.
Institutional biases, the data gap, the way male is taken as typical and female is atypical, medical misogyny (Scottish Liberal Democrats debated this issue at our last conference), the threat of the ‘manosphere' and how we can educate our sons early enough to resist the brainwashing that can go on online.
Subjects like street lighting and snow clearing all have gender bias.
Unpaid caring is predominantly put on the women's shoulders, as is - STILL - the majority of housework and child-rearing.
Menopause - do women who suffer from the worst symptoms need workplace protections?
Period poverty - have we done enough? The medicalisation of childbirth and the worrying lack of any drive to improve the experience.
Internationally - what, if anything, could we do to help the position of Afghan women and others in sexist regimes? GM, forced marriage, infanticide and the resulting skewed gender balance.
And then, of course, we have the ever-present threat of sexual violence hanging over our lives, most likely to be from someone we know.
Domestic violence, coercive control, I could go on and on.
As you can see, this is a topic I'm passionate about and would be happy to debate.
What I am not, however, prepared to debate is how transgender people fit into society, at an event not run by transgender people.
I think the focus on whether people should use the facilities of their legal gender, or the gender recorded at birth, is vastly disproportionate to the effect it has on the average woman's life.
I also subscribe, wherever appropriate, to the 'nothing about us, without us' ethos.
I hope this makes my position crystal clear.
I will not be attending or asking another Lib Dem to attend, as I cannot trust that this will not be a transphobic event.
Regards,
Mel Sullivan”