🚨ALERTA | ÚLTIMO MINUTO: por orden explícita del PRESIDENTE del ✨PRIMER GOBIERNO FEMINISTA DE LA HISTORIA✨, Carabineros de Chile procede a desparasitar e higienizar -probablemente por primera vez-, a una turba de personas menstruantes carentes de figura paternal. Ampliaremos

Keir Starmer won’t stop your kids being attacked by illegal migrants, he just doesn’t want them reading about it on the internet

This is nuts

here's what will happen. - u16 ban passes, platforms must verify all ages - kids use VPNs, government bans VPNs - age verification infrastructure already exists, its scope gets broader, more invasive, more extreme - Online Safety Act forces backdoors into encrypted messaging, E2E encryption dies, gov can read everything you ever send - CBDC rolls out, your internet passport and financial passport become the same document - anonymous accounts posting "wrongthink" are now identifiable prosecutable - the generation that grows up with this doesn't remember it being any other way - George Orwell was right about everything - it's over

Starmer wants 16-year-olds to vote, but not use social media. Old enough to choose the government. Too young to access the platforms where politics is debated. So where are they meant to get their information? Approved broadcasters? Government-approved content? School handouts? This is digital ID by the back door. Children need protection online. But bad parenting is not an excuse to build a surveillance state and restrict the whole country. Starmer cannot control the border, crime, spending or his own party. So now he wants to control the internet. That is not child safety. That is a collapsing Prime Minister hunting for a legacy.

In December 2025, Australia became the first country in the west to enforce an under 16 social media ban. Since then, Canada, UK, France, Denmark, Greece, Norway, Austria, Poland, Germany, Belgium, Slovenia, Spain and Italy have either tabled proposals or are actively debating these same restrictions. Do you think all these governments suddenly care about protecting our children and it’s all a big coincidence that they’re all doing it at the same time or maybe this is a coordinated effort? It must also be a coincidence that both liberal and conservative parties throughout the west agree that something needs to be done and that the only solution is to implement some type of social media ban… Call me a conspiracy theorist all you want but since when do the left and the right agree on anything?

Starmer: We want to digitally ID everyone who uses social media Brits: Absolutely Not! Starmer: OK then, we want to ban under 16s from social media (by digitally ID-ing everyone) Brits: OMG that’s a great idea. Idk what idiot would be against that 🥴

The Left is pushing for identification to use the internet while pushing for no identification to vote. Think about that.

Let’s be clear what just happened. A PM who floated banning X entirely over Grok images is now rushing a blanket ban on under‑16s’ social media access days before a critical by‑election. That’s not ‘a statement of who we are as a country’. That’s a government testing how much control it can get away with.

Let's build the full picture of what the UK government has announced this month. Every device in the country: scanned for nudity. Signal: ordered to build a backdoor. Every stolen iPhone: remotely disabled by law enforcement on request. children: banned from disappearing messages, VPNs, livestreaming, romantic AI. though Bluesky is exempted actually. and now: every adult who wants to use social media must verify their identity with a passport, credit card, facial recognition, or government digital ID. Your face. to tweet. A registry of every adult in the country who uses the internet, tied to their real identity, held by platforms that have already sold data to Cambridge Analytica, already been fined billions for privacy violations, already shared data with governments on request. Scans your device. Knows your face. Knows your real name behind every account. Can disable your phone. Has a backdoor into your messages. This is not about children.

The people who are cheering on the social media banning the UK clearly have no idea what is going on there. As a father, I agree that social media is toxic for kids. It’s actually toxic for most adults, but if you think that a government who has imprisoned adults for social media posts but covered up rape gangs is doing this for the benefit of children, I have a bridge in London to sell you. This will almost certainly be weaponized to further take away the freedoms of the British people, and although social media IS damaging to kids, it is one of the only ways they are getting alternative information than that curated by the leftist media. Just like the teens who are carrying knives in defiance of the knife ban, these kids will find a way around the social media ban. It is virtue signalling from a government who has been complicit in the destruction of British culture, and the useful idiots are cheering it on like the lemmings they are. Perhaps the onus to be responsible should be on the parents who give their kids the mental equivalent of crack cocaine in the form of a phone at a young age in an attempt to keep them quiet, rather than a tyrannical givernment who puts the interests of everyone but the British people first.

Reino Unido permite la violación en masa de las niñas britanicas a manos de inmigrantes del tercer mundo

Tells you everything. Rather than: “let’s make sure many more Americans can become trillionaires” Instead it’s: “let’s make sure that no other Americans ever reach that level of success.” These people are parasites. Explicitly opposed to human flourishing. Amazing.

Banning social media for teenagers only puts them in greater danger. Teens are forced to switch to VPNs — and unlock far worse illegal content. We’ve seen this before. When the Russian government banned Telegram, 95% of Russian teenagers kept using it. They just moved to VPNs.

I’m not a tech person so maybe this is dumb but isnt it easier to create a “children’s phone” at point of sale so you get a phone with built-in restrictions rather than asking every single person in the country whether they are over 16 or not through hackable digital ID software?

We're banning raves, because we don't want you having fun where we can't watch you. By the way let me tell you about Woodstock. We're cracking down on underage drinking. It's bad for you. Yeah of course we hit up the pubs at your age it was great. We're banning smoking, but just for you - the smoking age will go up one year every year. Oh yes of course, we used to be able to smoke inside everywhere, it was great really. We're banning flavored vapes. We don't have any evidence they're bad for you, you just like them too much. We're banning dodgeball during recess, someone might get hurt. Yeah we really enjoyed dodgeball too. We're banning flirting, because it might make the girls uncomfortable. We're locking you in your room for the next two years. Yes we know you're in no danger from the virus, but we're worried that you'll get us sick. By the way you have to take this needle if you want to leave your room again. Yes, twice. Well there will be boosters too. No, we aren't worried about side effects, that doesn't effect us at all. We're closing the frat houses, because we don't want you having fun without our permission. Please join these officially sanctioned university clubs instead. We're bringing in labor from the third world to work the service jobs, so you can't have a summer job. You need to go to university to get a good job. By the way we're raising the price of tuition. Oh look we're raising it again. Don't worry there are loans. At interest. Actually we're giving the good jobs to the foreigners we just imported, to make up for our racist past. We are very good people. No of course we aren't sacrificing anything. You just have to take one for the team. Also, we're giving the foreigners the houses. We needed to increase real estate prices. For our pensions, you see. Sadly no, you'll probably never be able to afford one yourself. By the way don't forget to pay your taxes. Need to support those pensions somehow! Eh? No, we're giving ourselves tax breaks of course. Seniors discount you know. Oh by the way, that one thing you still have, now that we've banned joy and kicked every ladder out from under you? That social media stuff you kids like? You guessed it! We're banning that too! Just for you though, we're still going to watch AI videos on Facebook. It's for your safety, you see. We've noticed that you're all getting rather irate, and we think it would be better for your mental health if you shut up for a while. Why don't you just go outside? Eh? No of course we aren't going to stop Ahmed and his twelve illiterate cousins from raping your sister, that would be culturally insensitive, which would make us feel very bad, and we can't have that.

En Chile los supuestamente "conservadores de derecha" están impulsando el uso del número identificador único e irrepetible de los chilenos como requisito para opinar en redes sociales...asunto que jamás estuvo en el programa con que llegaron al gobierno...¿qué diablos está pasando?

But for some reason, ID is banned for voting in California, New York and many other states

Patito Verde simplemente puso en la palestra una serie de video que #ustedes querían pasar piola. Si ha habido UN weon que sólo transparentó la verdad sin cometer ningún ilícito fue él. La cizaña que le siguen teniendo me dice todo lo que debo saber sobre sus verdaderas intenciones.

Yo, un adulto que puede firmar un contrato, contrato internet con una ISP. Como adulto podría tener la obligación de informar si el plan es para un menor de edad, luego desde la ISP se le pone un whitelist que excluye rrss, apuestas, pornografía, extremismo, alcohol, etc

Instead of banning kids from social media how about we ban politicians from our lives instead.