Joined October 2019
- Tweets 66,537
- Following 421
- Followers 558
- Likes 85,331
3,195 Photos and videos
anna1973 retweeted
Candace Owens has been telling her audience “we’re getting close” to cracking the Charlie Kirk assassination - for 200 days straight.
She isn’t close. The case has already been solved.
729
1,548
8,739
669,473
anna1973 retweeted
Jun 6
Dana Loesch: “God has ordered His church to care for widows, that widows be included, so they are not isolated, to protect widows, to care for widows, to not persecute a widow in the most ungodly ways, because you're jealous that you are not the one controlling an organization that that widow's husband built.”
@DLoesch live at WLS 2026
722
1,681
10,730
1,018,020
anna1973 retweeted
May 30
Ben Shapiro SLAMS Candace Owens and her minions for spreading lies about Erika Kirk.
He believes that foreign operatives have used Candace Owens and other useful idiots to HIJACK what should’ve been a unifying moment for many Americans after Charlie was killed.
And he’s right the constant attacks on Erika have been normalized. You see them all over social media. One of the largest dehumanization campaigns I’ve ever seen.
And it’s all happening in a time where political violence has been normalized as well. So it’s obvious that the next step was always going to be someone trying to hurt Erika and others at TPUSA.
I expect scum bags on the internet to do scummy things.
But Candace Owens knows better. She understands the current political climate that we’re in. She knows the weight that her words carry. Therefore I have no choice but to believe that she wants to get someone hurt or killed.
114
257
1,672
25,876
anna1973 retweeted
May 29
Nobody has profiteered more off of Charlie's death than you have, Candace, and you share plenty of Charlie's private communications with you. But there are a few important differences:
1. You were not Charlie's wife.
2. Your messages tend to be from half a decade ago or more -- I wonder why!
3. You love referring to dates he went on and women he knew prior to Erika. There is very clearly no reason to do this except trying to humiliate Erika, and you were doing even before you started accusing her of helping murder Charlie.
4. You do all of this to profit yourself. Yeah, Turning Point needs to raise money. It does that because it actually does things. It puts on multiple conferences a year, it organizes campus events and faith events; TP Action employs literally hundreds of people for ballot chasing efforts in swing states. You've never done anything remotely comparable -- and you couldn't, because you have neither the talent nor the selflessness to do it. All you have is the narcissism to think that what Charlie built should have been handed over to you for free.
May 29
Sharing private letters from your dead husband for the express purpose of fundraising is as tasteless as it is classless and I am without patience for those pretending otherwise.
There is nothing beautiful about this. It is shameless emotional-manipulation for money, made worse by the fact that these e-mails are not even authored by her.
3,261
2,526
16,741
2,229,877
anna1973 retweeted
May 28
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
1,786
14,894
54,608
1,647,279
anna1973 retweeted
May 28
E. Jean Carroll, who herself claimed to be a massive Trump fan 15 years ago, appears deranged and sick. She lives with rodents, names her cat Vagina, and her dog Tits. She writes stories about what her dog taught her about sex, claimed on live TV that rape was sexy, and paints trees blue.
Emails between her and her friend, who was also a key witness in the case, reveal her talking about her grand scheme to remove Trump from office. She was funded by a billionaire Democrat, benefited from changed laws specifically to prosecute Trump, and Carroll was the first person in the state to file under this new law. She won a case against Trump with zero evidence, no eyewitnesses, and in a trial where the judge refused to admit Trump's evidence against Carroll, showcasing a politically motivated prosecution.
If you don't see an issue with that, you are part of the problem.
The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, who accused Trump of sexual assault, according to sources cnn.it/4vkdJE5
585
6,431
25,879
2,407,979
anna1973 retweeted
May 28
All of this… and the fact that E. Jean Carroll couldn’t even remember ***the year*** the alleged assault occurred.
But @gtconway3d pushed her to sue anyway knowing the case was BS in an effort to take out Trump.
Since then…
Trump has been reelected.
Carroll is being investigated for perjury.
Conway is about to get smoked in his congressional race.
Karma.
May 28
E. Jean Carroll, who herself claimed to be a massive Trump fan 15 years ago, appears deranged and sick. She lives with rodents, names her cat Vagina, and her dog Tits. She writes stories about what her dog taught her about sex, claimed on live TV that rape was sexy, and paints trees blue.
Emails between her and her friend, who was also a key witness in the case, reveal her talking about her grand scheme to remove Trump from office. She was funded by a billionaire Democrat, benefited from changed laws specifically to prosecute Trump, and Carroll was the first person in the state to file under this new law. She won a case against Trump with zero evidence, no eyewitnesses, and in a trial where the judge refused to admit Trump's evidence against Carroll, showcasing a politically motivated prosecution.
If you don't see an issue with that, you are part of the problem.
104
843
2,873
57,147
Lied about Reid Hoffman paying her legal expenses…
Didn’t mention allegations in:
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Until 3 days after Trump announces re-election.
Sick.
559
6,053
23,427
237,260
anna1973 retweeted
May 27
Now, now, Candace, both of us know you can’t be trusted to follow any kind of agreement or keep any kind of promise. You said Erika Kirk could get you to stop your endless harassment — a lie. You said you’d meet us any time, any place, then said you couldn’t come to Phoenix because of some bogus assassination plot involving the cartels (lol).
Charlie was a far greater man than myself and he couldn’t fix you. Why would anybody trust you to change your behavior now?
603
586
6,556
140,151
May 18
RT @ddrey123: Hey Candace! So here it is hun…. He wasn’t your husband, it’s not your widowhood, it’s not your grief journey, TPUSA is not y…
859
anna1973 retweeted
Truth. I love how her followers never ask any questions. Oh yes they were besties. Talked all the time but…..
She unfollowed him in May 2024
She deleted all their pictures May 2024
She wasn’t invited to Amfest 24 or 25
She wasn’t invited to the woman’s summit she always had been at.
She can’t show any texts after 2023
She wasn’t invited to his wedding.
He never said anything bad about her or would debate her BECAUSE he didn’t want his family, him or TPUsa to become the target of what we have right now. He IGNORED her.
She said herself that she blames Ben for her and Charlie’s separation. That right after she was fired from DW that Ben convinced Charlie to cut ties with her.
But of course her followers don’t want to hear that. Reality isn’t something they want to hear.
May 16
Candace Owens hate of Charlie and Erika Kirk along with TPUSA all goes back to not even being invited to their wedding.
102
312
2,132
58,823
anna1973 retweeted
May 16
Candace Owens was perfectly fine with using the Daily Mail as a reliable source when they put out a headline that she thought she could use for her conspiracies.
But now that they put out an article to debunk her AI Charlie Kirk theory she suddenly doesn’t view them as a reliable source anymore.
She quickly went from bragging about Daily Mail articles to calling them absurd.
36
125
917
15,951
anna1973 retweeted
May 13
Don’t forget this guy. George Conway. He knew E Jean Carroll could bring a FAKE civil case. You ever wonder why she didn’t bring a criminal case? Right, because it never happened.
27 Jan 2024
My name is George Conway. I’m a left wing activist who hates Trump. I saw E Jean Carroll at a party for Kathy Griffen, the one with Trump’s severed head, & w/my ipad showed the differences b/t civil & criminal trials & then convinced her to sue Trump & recommended a lawyer.
7
20
71
1,150
anna1973 retweeted
May 13
George Conway - who engineered this entire ridiculous lawsuit - hardest hit.
Again- E Jean Carroll could not even recall the ***year*** this alleged assault happened. The case should’ve been thrown out right then and there.
May 13
Appeals Court blocks the $80M payment to Jean Carroll in her defamation judgment against President Trump.
She’ll never see a dollar of that money from that sham of a lawsuit.
Guess you and Rachel won’t be going to Paris after all, Jean.
233
1,449
6,478
84,116
anna1973 retweeted
𝗗𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗱 𝗝. 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗩𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝗼𝗻 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 - 𝟭𝟬:𝟭𝟱 𝗣𝗠 𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝟬𝟱.𝟭𝟭.𝟮𝟲
🚨President Trump posts video on how 20 CIA and FBI agents just dropped a political bomb on Obama, confirming that he and former CIA Director Brennan orchestrated a political coup against a candidate and then a sitting president.
377
3,294
9,786
544,209
anna1973 retweeted
May 7
You mean like the transition you led to incoming President Trump?
The one in which you, Biden, Brennan, Comey and Clapper sandbagged Trump with false charges of collusion and then launched the bogus Steele dossier against Trump. Not to mention what you did to countless WH and campaign aides.
Obama: "The White House shouldn't be able to direct the AG to go around prosecuting whoever the president wants prosecuted. You can't have a situation where whoever is in charge of the government starts using that to go after their political enemies or reward their friends."
1,960
8,872
26,764
461,026
anna1973 retweeted
3 Nov 2025
Retweet this post below. Schiff is tagged, so he’ll see every one of you who detests his lying, filthy existence.
2 Nov 2025
Who’s ready to see Adam Schiff go to jail for the Russian collusion hoax, mortgage fraud, and J6 committee lies?
He’s tagged in this post! Let him hear you.
18,739
99,573
133,853
2,836,481
anna1973 retweeted
EXCLUSIVE: Veteran DOJ Official Says Former President Obama Not Off The Hook In Grand Conspiracy Investigation
“Conducting a shadow campaign to disable somebody you don’t like politically is probably not protected…” as a core executive function.
“There’s room for a potential prosecution…by trying specifically to hobble President Trump.”
@thelatmg @latimesstudios_
BREAKING: Justice Department Veteran Reveals President Obama Prosecution Possible in ‘Grand Conspiracy’ Case Against President Trump; Says James Comey’s “8647” Indictment Will Likely Survive First Amendment Challenges
This week on Straight to the Point, I sat down with former DOJ official and longtime federal prosecutor Jim Trusty for a wide-ranging interview on the expanding investigations into Obama-era intelligence and law enforcement officials dubbed “The Grand Conspiracy."
Asked if the cases were viable, Trusty identified 18 USC 242 as the leading statute for prosecutions in the alleged ‘grand conspiracy’ and discusses how former CIA Director John Brennan’s TV appearances and recently published book may have reset the clock on the statute of limitations. Trusty also addressed James Comey's recent “8647” threat indictment and possible superseding false statements charges.
@thelatmg @latimesstudios_
Responding to the NC indictment, former FBI Director Comey said he is still innocent, not afraid, and believes in the independent judiciary.
John Brennan has called the investigation politically motivated.
Columbia Law School Professor Daniel Richman has not responded to repeated requests for comment.
00:40 Legal Theory Behind “Grand Conspiracy” Against President Trump
01:30 Former CIA Director Brennan Investigation
02:15 Florida Courts Are the Battleground
02:52 What is "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law"
04:30 Brennan Alleged “Abuse of Authority” 2017 Intelligence Report About Russia
04:55 Former NSA Director Mike Rogers Critical Witness
05:30 DOJ Can Get Around Statute of Limitations
06:15 Did Brennan’s TV Appearances, Book “Restart the Clock” on Statute of Limitations?
07:45 Brennan Claims Investigation is Politically Motivated
09:00 Attorney General Bondi vs Acting Attorney General Blanche
09:40 Comey “8647 Seashell” Indictment Can Survive First Amendment Challenge
11:32 Comey “Forfeiture of Assets”
13:28 Superseding Indictment Comey Case
14:05 Columbia Law School Professor Was Liaison to Media
15:14 FBI Director Patel Declassified FBI Media Leaks Probe Codenamed “Arctic Haze”
16:00 Potential False Statements to Investigators
16:50 Comey Memos: Trump/Russia Collusion Investigations
18:20 Was Comey the Source of Classified Leak?
18:45 President Obama Not Off The Hook
20:00 Defendants Will Try to Run Out the Clock
21:50 Legitimate Indictments vs. Moral Condemnation
23:10 White House Briefing: Taking the New Media Seat
23:55 Breaking the Legacy Media Hold on Washington
103
1,657
5,075
134,141