Don’t miss this important article by Gideon Haigh published today in Cricket et. al. today:
open.substack.com/pub/cricke…
“Like everyone with a cricket bone in their body,” Gideon finds himself “dazzled by the talent and poise of Vaibhav Sooryavanshi, who did not just dominate the recent Indian Premier League but rather defined it.” Yet, the writer argues justly, with careful verification, sensitivity, and balance, “the question of Sooryavanshi’s age, officially fifteen, will not go away.” “To my enjoyment of watching him,” Gideon declares, “I should state, it would make no difference whether he is fifteen or twenty-five…To the issue, however, I can’t affect the same post-truth nonchalance. For if Sooryavanshi is older than acknowledged, the consequences could be far reaching for others.”
Gideon looks into a 2023 interview given by Suryavananshi and other information that seem to contradict the claim that he is only 15 in 2026. The writer contextualises the question by citing no less than Rahul Dravid who spoke his mind on “the scourge of overage players in junior matches” and the fairly widespread practice of “age-fudging” at the junior level, with the collusion of coaches, parents, and others, in his MAK Pataudi Memorial Lecture given in New Delhi in December 2015. Dravid’s remarks have no direct bearing, of course, on the question of Survayanshi’s age and, in any case, the child prodigy, going by the date of birth presented in his official bio, March 27, 2011 (
espncricinfo.com/cricketers/…), was only four years old at the time.
Gideon gives due credit to the BCCI for grasping “the potential for age and domicile fraud,” tightening its bone density testing regime, closing other loopholes, and sanctioning several overage cricketers caught fudging their age at the junior level. But the BCCI now has this particular, highly sensitive responsibility: to act “to dispel all ambiguity with thorough enquiries and unassailable evidence of Sooryavanshi’s birthdate; most of all would it be fair to Sooryavanshi, whose achievements might otherwise be shaded by unnecessary ‘controversy’.”
Gideon Haigh’s essay, “Boy wondering,” is sports journalism, cricket journalism with a literary flavour, at its best.