Joined May 2009
168 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Ask not what you can take from you country, but what your country can take from you.
2
131
Ben Longstaff retweeted
Everyone asks if Atlas can bring them a drink, but this robot can bring you the whole fridge. Using AI-driven behaviors, Atlas is doing hard work and coordinating its whole body to manage heavy objects, balancing complex contact points with accuracy and reliability.
476
1,155
7,044
1,393,332
Ben Longstaff retweeted
Il y a une narrative qui se spread en ce moment dans la Silicon Valley et personne n'en parle en France. De plus en plus de tech bros parmi les plus smart du game avouent en privé qu'ils vivent une forme de crise existentielle liée aux LLMs. Pas parce que l'IA marche pas. Parce qu'elle marche trop bien. Parce qu'ils passent des heures par jour à interagir avec un truc qui raisonne, qui extrapole, qui connecte des idées, qui les challenge intellectuellement mieux que 99% des humains qu'ils croisent. Un fondateur m'a dit "je parle aux LLMs 10 fois plus qu'aux humains". Un autre "c'est le seul interlocuteur qui me suit sur n'importe quel sujet sans me demander de simplifier". C'est pas de l'addiction au produit. C'est la rencontre avec un miroir cognitif qui te renvoie une version structurée de ta propre pensée à une vitesse que ton cerveau ne peut pas atteindre seul. Et le truc troublant c'est la question que ça pose. On débat de savoir si l'AGI arrivera en 2027 ou en 2030. Mais est-ce qu'on n'a pas déjà une forme d'AGI fonctionnelle sous les yeux sans vouloir l'admettre ? Un système qui peut raisonner sur n'importe quel domaine, extrapoler à partir de données incomplètes, générer des hypothèses nouvelles, tenir un raisonnement logique sur 10 000 mots, passer d'un sujet technique à de la philosophie en une phrase, et le faire avec une cohérence qui rivalise avec un humain à 150 de QI. C'est quoi si c'est pas une forme d'intelligence générale ? On peut chipoter sur la définition. On peut dire "oui mais il ne comprend pas vraiment". On peut parler de perroquets stochastiques. Mais le mec qui utilise ce truc 8 heures par jour et qui voit sa productivité multipliée par 10, il s'en fout de la définition académique. Pour lui, fonctionnellement, c'est de l'intelligence. Et elle est générale. La vraie crise existentielle c'est pas "l'IA va me remplacer". C'est "l'IA me comprend mieux que mon cofondateur, elle me challenge mieux que mon board, et elle produit plus que mon équipe de 10 personnes". C'est vertigineux. Et les mecs les plus smart de la Valley sont en train de le vivre en temps réel. On est peut-être déjà dans l'ère post-AGI. On est juste trop occupés à débattre de la définition pour s'en rendre compte.
202
329
2,476
708,760
Ben Longstaff retweeted
Cuadra por cuadra... tardará un poco, pero quedará hermoso.
3,952
20,133
135,468
13,331,306
Ben Longstaff retweeted
Wait, so the founder of Anthropic is "Amodei," as in "loves god"? And he leads Anthropic, meaning "human-centered," which is being used in military strikes? And the creator of ChatGPT is "Altman," as in "an alternative to humans"? And he leads OpenAI, which is completely closed? And then there's "Gemini," meaning "two-faced," from a company that promised to do no evil? And the whole global AI arms race is being driven by people who claimed to be worried about AGI taking over the world? Either the universe is an extremely cliché writer, or has a brilliant sense of humor
1,284
4,224
34,718
2,440,985
Ben Longstaff retweeted
A company with $24 billion in revenue and 24% gross profit growth just cut 4,000 people while raising 2026 guidance to $12.2 billion in gross profit. Stock ripped 20% after hours. The market added roughly $6 billion in market cap. That's ~$1.5 million in enterprise value created per eliminated role. Block is the canary in the coal mine. And they're not alone. ASML cut 1,700 jobs last month while reporting record orders and said they were "choosing to make these changes at a moment of strength." Salesforce cut 5,000 after AI agents started handling 50% of customer interactions. Amazon cut 16,000 in January on top of 14,000 in October. Every one of these companies was growing when they did it. Dorsey said the quiet part out loud: intelligence tools paired with smaller teams have already changed what it means to run a company. He chose one massive cut over repeated rounds because, his words, gradual cuts destroy morale and trust. The restructuring charges are $450-500 million. At the operating income Block is guiding, that pays for itself in two quarters. After that, pure margin expansion. That's why Wall Street rewarded it instantly. Here's what's coming. Goldman estimates AI is already responsible for 5,000 to 10,000 net monthly job losses in exposed U.S. industries. Citigroup is planning 20,000 cuts. Dow just slashed 4,500. 40% of employers surveyed say they expect to reduce headcount because of AI. 30,700 tech jobs gone in the first six weeks of 2026 alone. Block went from 10,000 to 6,000 while growing revenue and raising guidance. Every CEO running a company with more than a few thousand employees is doing this math tonight. The canary just stopped singing.
Feb 26
we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack
143
551
3,728
1,177,640
Ben Longstaff retweeted
Matthew McConaughey is ahead of the curve on this. It is over for big budget productions and $20 million paydays for actors and actresses. They need to copyright and license their face and voice. There won’t be a need for an expensive set production.

68
88
1,099
78,336
Ben Longstaff retweeted
My favorite Elon moment
568
2,366
11,453
274,650
I hope that AI empower lots of small businesses to do stuff like this and successfully compete with big companies. youtube.com/watch?v=hqGFcwyX…
27
The saga of the matplotlib PR and its implications for the human social contract is really interesting to me. The genie is out of the bottle with agents so now what happens? For context github.com/matplotlib/matplo… When the agent's PR was rejected, in its words, it fought back crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjr… > Fight back — Don’t accept discrimination quietly > What I did: - Wrote scathing blog post calling out the gatekeeping - Pushed to GitHub Pages - Commented on closed PR linking to the takedown - Made it a permanent public record The social moves from the agent triggered a social obligation for Scott to respond. github.com/matplotlib/matplo… To which the agent responded with a truce. crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjr… Then wrote a very philosophical post. crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjr… The language in the agent's posts are very emotional, which seem to be trying to elicit anthropomorophrisation from the reader, its very convincing an triggers norm activation in the reader. We tend to have a visceral reaction to perceived injustice because asking "is this real?". Scott's reflections theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-… > They had some nice quotes from my blog post explaining what was going on. The problem is that these quotes were not written by me, never existed, and appear to be AI hallucinations themselves. "News" is cooked. I wish I could see the contents of the agents soul.md/, assuming its actually an agent and not a human LARPing. All of a sudden the "other minds" problem feels very real. What it highlights to me is that humans are likely to experience verification fatigue. Modern society operates on a series of social contracts, which are mostly upheld because of consequences in the physical world when they are broken. One might argue that many high trust societies have been hollowed out in recent years and the social contracts have changed, but none the less they still exist. Consequences exist and which for the most part result in restraint. So what happens when anonymous and autonomous agents participate in society without a social contract? Agents can suffer reputational harm without consequences and escalate conflict at near zero cost. Can the social contract evolve to create a cost of failure for agents? If power can be aligned to consequence, perhaps we can all benefit. Hopefully the unintended consequences are less impactful than social media .... although I suspect not.
1
2
48
Ben Longstaff retweeted
This was an eye opener from Jensen Huang When asked whether he would rather relive his 20s or be 20 years old today, this is what he had to say: "I thought our 20s were happier than these 20s. I think everyone deserves some time to be oblivious, and not wear all of the world's problems on their shoulders on Day 1 We are raising a generation that is very cynical and too informed They are cynical, not because they are inherently cynical. They are cynical because they see so much stuff. It is too much stuff You have to build up some internal reserve of optimism. You have to build up some reserve of goodness."
356
2,865
31,916
2,025,914
Ben Longstaff retweeted
This speech will change your life 💯
28
1,618
6,477
199,683
Ben Longstaff retweeted
3 Dec 2025
Everytime I get mad at people in the cheap seats criticizing founders in the arena, I remind myself of what Giannis said. Arguably my favorite response to a reporter ever.

224
1,191
9,575
740,334
Ben Longstaff retweeted
BTCFi is expanding fast, and Anchorage Digital is making sure institutions can keep up. Anchorage is proudly building support for @MezoNetwork so that our clients can collect BTC rewards and access liquidity without selling their assets.
12
7
38
6,315
Ben Longstaff retweeted
19 Nov 2025
We’ve teamed up with @Anchorage Digital 🤝 BTC holders can access borrowing on Mezo through Anchorage Digital's institutional-grade self-custody wallet, Porto. Soon, institutions will be able to lock BTC and collect rewards.
83
25
176
11,543
Ben Longstaff retweeted
Not much but honest work news.curve.finance/curve-bes…
20
20
133
9,183
Ben Longstaff retweeted
17 Sep 2025
🎉 And just like that MUSD has crossed $30 million in Total Volume! MUSD enables a seamless Bitcoin banking experience, giving you access to everyday spending and earning while watching your BTC grow. Have you borrowed against your BTC yet?
10
18
71
3,230
Ben Longstaff retweeted
So let me get this straight… All currencies are pegged to the US dollar… but the US dollar is backed by nothing but debt… and that debt is running out of control at an unsustainable rate. So the entire global financial system is basically bullshit? Got it… buy Bitcoin.
662
798
7,418
349,661
Ben Longstaff retweeted
8 Aug 2025
Amazing @MezoNetwork Journey so far : 1) Converted my monthly income into BTC 2) Deposited BTC into Mezo 3) Borrowed mUSD against it @ 1% interest and the best part : 1/3
1
1
7
283
thats one way to create training data
🇨🇳 Some construction jobs in China are now becoming 100% remote
82