Been spending some more time over on Mastodon lately. Itās felt refreshing. Reminds me a lot of the early early Twitter days. Who knows if itāll stick, but Iām posting more there these days. macaw.social/@bhaggs
𦣠Come on in, the waters fine. While your biggest hurdle may be what Mastodon server to sign up with, the @tapbots crew have made quite a fine client that is a real joy to use.
Say Hello to Ivory. Our Mastodon client for iOS available on the App Store! If you liked Tweetbot, you'll love Ivory and feel right at home. Go download it, try it free for 7 days, and experience it for yourself!
apps.apple.com/us/app/ivory-ā¦
This is really gonna be the stress test. Final match of #WorldCup2022 certainly. Then youāve got NYE in Japan coming shortly after. I have a lot of faith in what was built to handle these scenarios. But at this point, who knows.
To @jackās credit, we Tweeps pushed back, asked hard questions, and called him out a lot internally and publiclyāwithout fear that heād be petty and instantly fire you. He was always open to discuss, even when it was discussions critical of his decisions.
Elon Musk has been directing subordinates to comb through Twitter's Slack and make lists of people making fun of him or his plans for firing. They've also been monitoring employee's tweets. Latest w/ @kateconger and @MikeIsaac)
nytimes.com/2022/11/15/technā¦
I imagine a lot of internal Slack channels will start to go quietādue to fear anything you say may be deemed insubordinate and not showing fealty to Dear Elon. People will switch to communications platforms not managed by the company to discuss.
This is quite sad because Twitter had a very open culture in terms of discussion. Everyone could see what was being made, what the plan was, what the discussion had been, and even to chime in if desired.
I actually worked on removing client source from the Tweet anatomy and then years later adding it back in. Itās helpful context and does provide a humanness signal to a degree. Unless this is removed from the API entirely, simply hiding it makes things worse.
I would actually really like to see this happen. I think itās relatively feasible on a faster timetable as we built some of the plumbing for this for what eventually turned into the political labels on accounts.
I still stand by the Designator/Affiliate approach we worked on as one prong of handling identity verification. Just because it didnāt solve all aspects of verification doesnāt mean it wasnāt worth implementing.
Fun fact, when we first launched the political candidate labels in 2018 we initially had to make the icon in the size/shape of a profile picture as it was architected to be an affiliating account instead of just a label.
Twitter as a platform has an outsized sphere of influence in the world which simply does not align with its actual usage. People often falsely assume Twitter is bigger than it actually is. In many ways itās their Achilles heel.
This is the key point. Advertisers donāt need Twitter. It wasnāt in the top tier for where they wanted to spend their money even before Elon launched Brand Fraud Premiumā¢ļø.
Publishers also got royally burned by Facebook in the past. So they likely have no desire to get more entrenched with tech companies holding the keys to their audience. In fact, theyāre doing the oppositeāthemselves becoming essentially ātechā companies (e.g., NYT).
If youāre massively Twitter online, it may feel this way. If you work at Twitter or just do some general ācitizen journalismā you will know this is absolutely not the case.