Film buff and political nerd. Vote Democrat.

Joined October 2009
10,316 Photos and videos
Brian Hamm retweeted
"affordability is fake" oh ok cool
Trump: We have the strongest economy we've ever had. The word 'affordability' is a fake word made up by the Democrats.
36
556
3,762
Brian Hamm retweeted
“The rape gangs aren’t being taken seriously by the mainstream media. What should we do?” “Use spurious methodology to inflate the already horrific numbers?” “Brilliant”
18
6
165
5,995
Brian Hamm retweeted
Unless you're an brain-wormed partisan, "Iran is an evil regime," "this preventive war was stupid and should never have been launched," and "this peace deal is a US humiliation" are three perfectly true things you should be able to believe at the same time.
35
327
1,474
28,345
Brian Hamm retweeted
Ain't noooooo way, lmao
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. 🇺🇸⚡️🦅
49
239
7,024
336,419
The 250k number is total bullshit btw which should be super obvious to anyone that isn't a deeply racist knuckle dragger. This article explains why in detail. In short they applied the rape rates of the worst areas of the U.K to the entire country. thejournal.ie/250000-victims…
250 thousand white girls raped and trafficked by Muslim immigrant pedophiles in the UK. Industrial scale sexual abuse and torture inflicted on the native inhabitants by barbaric foreign gangs who were welcomed into the country by the government. One of the worst scandals in the history of the western world. It really is that bad. Anyone who ignores this story is forever discredited going forward. Watch especially for the people on “our side” who look the other way.
16
7
85
11,277
Brian Hamm retweeted
Wild how they all just lied about this
The supposed text of the MOU that was obtained by CNN does not reflect the language of the actual MOU.
42
462
4,322
110,082
It's giving:
The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. bit.ly/4uE5odw
25
Brian Hamm retweeted
✅️ Why any critical thinker will not take this report seriously ⁉️ 👉 Not a formal inquiry: The report is a privately produced document led by a sitting MP with clear political views, not a statutory public inquiry with legal powers, independent oversight, or official status. 👉 Anecdotal evidence reliance: It depends heavily on survivor and whistleblower testimonies without transparent selection, verification, or sampling methods, leaving it vulnerable to bias and difficult to corroborate at scale. 👉 Weak national estimates: Claims such as 250,000 victims are extrapolations from limited local data rather than results from systematic national statistics or rigorous quantitative analysis. 👉 Over-extension of conviction data: It takes solid conviction samples (e.g. 84% South Asian in reviewed cases) and stretches them into wider claims about overall perpetrator proportions that the data cannot fully support. 👉 Interpretive sections over-reach: Chapters linking issues to Islamic doctrine or Muslim culture present contested cultural arguments as straightforward analysis, with limited engagement of counter-evidence or alternative explanations. 👉 Partisan political tone: Sections attacking specific politicians, parties, and prior inquiries mix factual institutional failures with accusatory, selective political commentary. 👉 Narrow scope: It focuses almost exclusively on one demographic profile of group-based grooming while giving far less attention to other major forms of child sexual exploitation shown in official data. 👉 Poor methodological transparency: There is no clear methods section explaining data collection, inclusion criteria, or how conclusions were reached, making the report read as advocacy rather than formal research. 👉 Confirmation bias in structure: The organisation and emphasis appear designed to reinforce a pre-existing narrative (political correctness specific cultural factors) rather than neutrally examining multiple causes. 👉 Limited new contribution: Much of the strongest content simply restates findings from earlier official inquiries (Jay, Telford, Casey); the added value is mainly compiled testimony and interpretive framing rather than fresh empirical work. We need a full independent, non-political party aligned enquiry. Simple
The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. bit.ly/4uE5odw
20
25
129
4,848
Brian Hamm retweeted
Obama got a better deal, without war.
61
275
2,217
19,876
Brian Hamm retweeted
Rupert Lowe is also making it up. Hope that helps.
🚨Just a reminder that before Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry Report was released Piers Morgan said my claim of 250,000 girls being raped by Pakistani Muslim men in Britain was “utterly ridiculous.” Cenk Uygur said that I was “making it up.”
5
8
88
6,264
Brian Hamm retweeted
Totally agree. lol. Good luck with this approach.
I think Israel should cut off America completely. No more intelligence sharing. No more technology sharing. Nothing. Clean break.
67
595
7,667
151,974
Brian Hamm retweeted
Why is every DSA candidate so cagey about Ukraine. There has never been a more clear cut country to support than Ukraine. If you valued democracy at all you should be unequivocal in your support of them.
261
405
6,021
162,875
Brian Hamm retweeted
"250,000 girls raped by Muslim gangs" is the new "40 beheaded babies" LIE. This figure isn't credible. It comes from Rupert Lowe's discredited report, which relies on Lord Pearson's guesswork, extrapolated from data in just a handful of towns. Lowe admitted this on page 12.
347
416
1,717
50,757
Brian Hamm retweeted
Replying to @YinonMagal
1
5
289
15,727
Brian Hamm retweeted
YOU ALREADY HAD BIDEN AND YOU KILLED HIS PRESIDENCY Hope the third-rate genocide was worth it, because you're not getting a more pro-Israel president in a while
BIDEN SAVE US
25
87
2,125
61,156
Brian Hamm retweeted
We can’t believe it either
I can't believe I voted for this pathetic clown 3 times. WTF? What a disgrace.
5
34
562
8,098
Brian Hamm retweeted
Replying to @mikemovies
Awesome. Really makes Shakespeare accessible. The rampart scene and pre battle scene will raise the hackles. If they don’t, feel free to hold thy manhoods cheap.
1
5
72
Brian Hamm retweeted
Just had to have this talk with my husband. The comfort of our daughter is above mine and his. Always take her to a woman's restroom. He completely understood. Don't be like Ashley
I know people are split on this, but I’m not. My husband and my dad would’ve never walked into a women’s restroom. Ever. When our daughter was little and I wasn’t with them, my husband took her into the men’s room. Did he love it? No. Are men’s bathrooms usually gross? Yes. But public bathrooms are gross in general. Nobody is sitting down comfortably in either one like they’re at home. I wish every place had a family restroom. That would solve a lot of this. But they don’t, and you still have to make the best decision in the moment. For me, that decision is not a grown man going into the women’s restroom. If the concern is cleanliness, then are we saying dads should start bringing little boys into the women’s restroom too? Because little boys are also children. They also deserve clean bathrooms. That argument falls apart pretty fast. Use the men’s stall. Stand guard. Bring wipes. Bring sanitizer. Put toilet paper down. If you’re worried about stall gaps, keep a towel or blanket in the car. It may not be ideal, but parenting is full of “not ideal.” Men do not belong in women’s restrooms. And I don’t think that should be controversial.
46
31
747
11,083
Brian Hamm retweeted
They aren’t even comparable. It’s not a both sides thing. It’s trump getting embarrassed.
1
22
193