PhD candidate @YaleEconomics, on the JM in 2025/26. Mostly labor. Spare time: elite (cat 1) road bike racer 2:44 marathoner. She/her

Joined February 2018
46 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
I'm on the job market! A little bit about my JMP here 👇
Why do some firms limit workplace flexibility, and what does that mean for inequality? Dana Scott's JMP shows that technological constraints make flexibility costly for some firms, shaping the trade-offs workers—especially women—face between flexibility and pay. Website: dana-scott.com @danascoot
12
143
38,617
Dana Scott retweeted
Blockbuster paper from all-star team (@john_eric, @ChrisANeilson, @Xiaoyang_Ye, Seth Zimmerman) nber.org/papers/w33038
3
97
306
157,439
Dana Scott retweeted
🚨New working paper with @key_z_e addressing the data gap on property insurance markets.  We develop a new dataset with over 47 million observations of homeowners insurance expenditures. nber.org/papers/w32579 The map of 2023 premiums shows massive heterogeneity:
8
46
150
85,155
are the kids for real
45
14
658
243,099
Dana Scott retweeted
3 Jun 2024
France seems to be crushing it: • Builds housing • Builds transit (Anglo country difficulty level: impossible) • Leading Europe esp on defense • Green: nuclear, bikes etc • High birth rates in declining world; Paris seems like highest birth rate large metro
368
529
8,061
3,445,351
I was in a bookstore the other day and a guy walked in and asked where the theology section was. After being told there was no theology section, defeated, he asked if they had a copy of Thinking Fast and Slow
50 Books To Master 10 Skills
4
4,193
Dana Scott retweeted
when you're at new haven union station and reminded that diversification and resiliency are key to any successful business strategy
3
28
321
92,672
14 May 2024
i love lana del rey her lyrics are so deep
ive been muttering “diet pepi pepi diet mountain dew” to myself all morning
6
2,681
Dana Scott retweeted
Hi #EconTwitter!✍️ Working on perfecting your writing style for #economics papers and essays? Check out this useful resource by @VaranyaChaubey on improving your research paper writing skills. Tailored for PhD candidates and postdocs but useful for everyone! Plus, don’t miss Varanya’s 2020 guide on refining the first draft of your paper. Highly recommended! ⭐️ Links How to improve: arxiv.org/abs/2012.07787 Research writing: books.google.co.uk/books/abo…
1
87
372
55,151
Dana Scott retweeted
📢 Call for papers. Submit your paper to the "Gender and Work" workshop that will take place in Barcelona, October 14 and 15, 2024. Confirmed keynotes: @OlleFolke and @Paola_Profeta . More here👇: events.bse.eu/event/13828-wo…
1
65
140
48,551
Dana Scott retweeted
I’ve successfully filed 8 FOIAs and won 3 FOIA lawsuits. The following thread is a guide to filing a FOIA request as a researcher, including templates and real example filings. Please RT! If this thread is helpful, I'll write a Part 2 on filing FOIA lawsuits. 1/10
2
139
438
121,437
for an ε-small fee i will attend your talk and make a comment that is δ > 0 different from all the others
3
1
62
10,626
29 Jan 2024
The GOAT pareto improving trade
nobody has won at life more in recent history than the guy who sold wordle to the nytimes for seven figures
1,797
24 Jan 2024
Leontief production function just dropped
23 Jan 2024
For most companies, hiring more people is strictly better. However, this is often not true in AI research. AI research is often bottlenecked by compute, and when this is the case, hiring more researchers can be counter-productive. I remember back at Google Brain, my manager once said we had one headcount and asked who we should hire. I responded that hiring someone will basically be counterproductive and we should try to trade the headcount for TPUs/GPUs instead. For example, if a researcher needs 100 GPUs to do their research and the team is already bottlenecked by compute, there is no point hiring them because everyone else on the team will simply take a hit in productivity in waiting for GPUs. So an interesting hiring consideration is how many GPUs a potential hire will need to do their work. Hiring an extra person could feel like progress but if you don't scale GPUs at the same rate that you scale number of people on the team, the productivity of the team might not improve. This leads to a conclusion that I believe is true but not advertised explicitly: people who are able to do good work with few GPUs can be more hirable/flexible/productive on teams that are compute-bottlenecked, compared to people who only know how to do work if they have 1k GPUs at their disposal. (One caveat though---if the new people you hire will use GPUs *more productively* than the current team, that could be OK since net team productivity will increase, even though productivity per person decreases. Conversely, if the new person you hire needs to use many GPUs and doesn't use them well, then both net team productivity and productivity per person will decrease.)
3
2,362
20 Jan 2024
This is an incredibly cool paper. Really interesting and clear way to think about how to use new technologies in research
16 Jan 2024
Recently accepted by #QJE, “Machine Learning as a Tool for Scientific Discovery,” by Ludwig (@profjensludwig) and Mullainathan (@m_sendhil): doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjad055
1
1
4
3,055
Dana Scott retweeted
You know those policies that some universities have that admit the top X% of each high school in the state? They're really good for disadvantaged students. They increase graduation rates and annual salaries of disadvantaged students *a lot*. zacharybleemer.com/wp-conten…
16
199
826
125,882
10 Jan 2024
What’s a girl gotta do to get a closed form wage equation in this town huh
2
20
8,047
Dana Scott retweeted
2024 mood 😤
16
573
5,251
552,378