This is the deciding concept for the new paradigm. In the West, the leading contemporary proponents of this concept, as fully developed by Plato, Cusa, and Leibniz, have been Lyndon and Helga LaRouche. Join @ZeppLaRouche tomorrow at 11am Eastern: eir.news/2026/05/eir-may-15-…

7 days left. I’ve called in special reinforcements.

eir.news/2026/06/news/nato-i… The Angry Dogs Substack has just concluded, on June 13, 2026, a 9 part series ostensibly on the New Bretton Woods. The author, Matthew Pearce, is a Brit who identifies himself as a founding member of NAFO (North Atlantic Fellas Organization), which readers will recall is a creature of the same fascist NATO intelligence networks that spawned the Myrotvorets hit-list and the Ukrainian government’s Center for Countering Disinformation (CCD). While the series is clearly intended as a hit piece, especially on Lyndon LaRouche, Helga LaRouche, and the work of their movement over decades to create a new just world economic order, the freakout is quite revealing. It is more useful to focus on what the author reveals about his own thinking and that of those he works for, than to be distracted by the many factual errors and fallacies of composition. The idea for a New Bretton Woods is framed as entirely authored by LaRouche, but functionally in the nefarious interest of Russia, China, and Iran. Pearce correctly lays out several points of LaRouche’s approach: Sovereign credit instead of debt; backed by physical production and development, especially heavy infrastructure, rather than gold; converting nations into producers, rather than just sources of raw materials…. Every utterance of similar vocabulary is attributed to a smuggling of LaRouche’s ideas into “mainstream” institutions. Cited as part of this are Sergei Glaziev, Dave Goldman, Uwe Parpart, Webster Tarpley, Harley Schlanger, Bill Engdahl, Larry Freeman, Tanu Maitra, etc. They supposedly have foisted these ideas upon Scott Bessent, Janet Yellen, Roger Stone, Naledi Pandor, Dennis Kucinich, etc. Pearce does give the game away a bit in insisting that the dollar’s reserve status, and the SWIFT payments system, used as weapons, are more important for the West’s security and dominance than NATO’s military forces. Sections Two and Five focus on the LaRouche movement per se, while Section Four features the LaRouche role in the 2023 Rage Against the War Machine Rally at the Lincoln Memorial. Pearce also singles out the importance and threat posed by EIR and other publications of the movement. Some choice quotes from part five are included here: Opening: Lyndon LaRouche died on the 12th of February 2019, in Leesburg, Virginia, aged 96. He had been a federal-fraud convict for thirty years, an eight-time presidential candidate, the author of a body of cosmological writing that ranged from the merely eccentric to the medically interesting, and the sort of figure that political obituarists reach for the word “fringe” to dispose of. The New York Times obituary ran to nine paragraphs. The Washington Post gave him eleven. Both treated the death as a footnote. This was the most consequential editorial misjudgement of the decade. The doctrine survived. More than survived… Helga Zepp-LaRouche, LaRouche’s German-born widow and the founder of the Schiller Institute in 1984, took the operational succession.” After reviewing all sorts of individuals who have passed in and out of the LaRouche organization over decades, Pearce concludes: “The fact that Goldman worked at Executive Intelligence Review in the late 1970s does not mean every word he writes in 2026 is LaRouche doctrine. The fact that Pandor spoke at a Schiller Institute conference does not mean she takes her foreign-policy line from Helga Zepp-LaRouche. The fact that Stone has interviewed everyone from LaRouche to Bessent does not mean Stone is the load-bearing element in a coherent operation. All of this is correct, taken individually. Taken collectively, it is the structural answer the series is building toward. “The point is not that any one person in this chain were taking direct orders from a deceased convicted fraudster... The point is that an identifiable network, with continuous personnel, a continuous publication apparatus, and a continuous doctrinal vocabulary, has spent five decades producing the intellectual framework that is now the official rhetoric of cabinet-level positioning in the two largest powers contesting the dollar system... “A man convicted of mail fraud in 1989 has had more sustained influence on twenty-first-century monetary policy than every Nobel laureate in economics combined. The vehicle was his employees. The doctrine outlived the doctrinaire because the doctrinaire was, all along, less important than the apparatus. Lyndon LaRouche was the most successful intellectual entrepreneur in modern American political history, and the measure of the success is that fifty years after he first proposed a New Bretton Woods, the phrase is in two successive Treasury Secretaries’ mouths, across both parties, and nobody is asking where it came from.” Three things should jump out to the astute reader: 1. As Lyndon LaRouche often admonished, his enemies are always far more aware of the power of his ideas and policies than many of his supporters are. 2. The establishment’s attacks tend to attribute their own motives and methods to their opponents. (Laundering assets to hide their aims and origins is a tool used by the MICIMATT, not the LaRouche movement) 3. Those who refuse to think creatively will never understand that the power of ideas is far more powerful than doxxing and intimidation. theangrydogs.com/archive?sor…

All I’m gonna say is, there’s only one campaign in the Bronx knocking on doors in NY-15 and it isn’t Ritchie Torres or Michael Blake… So, keep that in mind when you see figures like this…

⚠️ The two party system is not broken by accident. It is working exactly how the donors, Wall Street, AIPAC, crypto money, and party bosses want it to work. @votevega26 says the Speak the Truth Party is coming for the machine.

🚨 The New York Democrat machine is in PANIC MODE. @votevega26 says his campaign forced them to rally around Ritchie Torres, protect the party, and spend money to keep the machine alive.

Hear it directly from the Bronx: why this high schooler who can’t vote for me is knocking on doors in The Bronx to elect Jose Vega

The deal is cut! Netanyahu failed! x.com/cmshehbaz/status/20662…

Today is day 1 of early voting. If you are in the 15th Congressional District in the Bronx, you are now allowed to go and cast your ballot to vote for me and get that AIPAC tool Ritchie Torres out of the Congress 💪

11 days until the Primary; 144 til the General x.com/i/broadcasts/1MJgNNAWw…

I've been told to take it easier on the Democrats. I've been told that i'm too radical to support. That Michael Blake is the better option. He does, after all, have more "experience" I'm proud to say we have out raised Michael Blake in the last reporting period The anti-Torres momentum lies with us. We are showing that Declaring your Independence allows you to overcome the petty institutional gatekeepers in order to build real power. I am so grateful for each and everyone of you. But the jobs not finished. 11 days to go. Let's keep that momentum STRONG!

"You couldn't have human rights without development," said Gambian vice-president Mohammed Jallow. He said his visit to China was deeply inspiring. Beyond being impressed by the country's rapid development, he highlighted China's commitment to fair and inclusive development, which brings benefits to "the doorstep of these people". #MediaUnlocked

eir.news/2026/06/news/bering… Fyodor Soloviev, the founder and President of Inter-Bering LLC, a consulting group that strongly advocates the construction of the Bering Strait tunnel, told EIR in a June 9 interview that the Chinese are interested in the Bering Strait tunnel, and that China’s volume of goods shipment could be essential for the tunnel project’s success. Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) and special presidential representative for investment and economic cooperation with foreign countries, stated June 5 at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) that he believes that “China could join the [Bering Strait] project.” Soloviev told EIR that the “initial cargo traffic between Russia and the United States is not enough to sustain the cost of building the tunnel. But China could have a lot of cargo that goes to the United States, some of which goes by ship. Not only Chinese goods, but China can ship goods from North and South Korea, Vietnam, etc. Shipping goods by rail rather than ship traffic would be a cheaper means for those countries.” A logical gathering point for that cargo, Soloviev said, is Harbin, the industrial hub of China’s far-northeastern Heilongjiang province. One place that the cargo from China and other countries could cross into Russia would be at Heihe, China, which is across the Amur River (called the Heilongjiang River in China) from the Russian city of Blagoveshchensk. In 2022, the Russians and Chinese built a highway bridge connecting Heihe and Blagoveshchensk. They also built a railway bridge across a different portion of the Amur River connecting Nizhneleninskoye in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast with Tongjiang in China’s Heilongjiang province. Soloviev identified other additional places where Chinese cargo could pass into Russia. Soloviev pointed out that the Chinese are building a high-speed rail line from Harbin, China to Yichun, China. This is a 318 kilometer (200 mile) high speed line in which train units can travel at 250 km/h (155 mph), which is scheduled to open in the latter portion of 2026. It will carry passengers, but a similar line for freight can be conceived. The winter temperature in Harbin is very cold: from -20°C to -30°C (-4°F to -22°F). “The Chinese can build with the Russians, or if asked, by themselves, highspeed freight rail along the road to the Bering Strait. They’re very good. They build a large portion of their high-speed rail network on elevated blocks [raised up pillars or bridges] rather than on the ground.” He added, “they have the dollars to invest.” This is Soloviev’s assessment. On June 8, the Russian publication RTVI carried an opinion editorial from Soloviev in which he stated that the estimate of the cost of $8 billion to build the Bering Strait tunnel and rail could be understated, and likely may be at least $35 billion, and possibly $60 billion. He mentioned the tunnel project’s benefits to Russia, the United States, and China. But in this piece, Soloviev, who is based out of Anchorage, Alaska, emphasized his main contention: “However, in my opinion, the most interesting effect lies not in the benefit to any one country, but in the creation of new infrastructure on a global scale. History shows that the construction of major transport systems benefits not only investors or countries, but also entire regions, which gain access to new markets, investments, and development opportunities. This was the case with the construction of the transcontinental railways in the United States, the Trans-Siberian Railway in Russia, the Suez Canal, and the Channel Tunnel.”

youtube.com/watch?v=41Hnz1if… Tonight we have tonight organizing reports from the US, Spain, Mexico, Russia, Sweden and Lebanon. LaRouche movement activity also took place this past week in Canada, France, Germany, and China.

Coming home from school, Univision, Telemundo, primer impacto, Laura, was always on the tv. Now I’m on it too!

This is so accurate! The problem is a system wide problem. We need people in these positions that actually want to do the right thing by the people. It is bigger than Ritchie and Hakeem. But removing them removes a big part of the problem overall. Elect people who ARE the people.

The people at home need to reckon with what kind of a Democratic Party they want...Both parties of the house voted for section 224, which would allow for the sharing of military technology between the United States and Israel. And Michael Blake refused to acknowledge that. AND RITCHIE TORRES VOTED IT!

If you want to vanquish the Vampire that is AIPAC & Ritchie Torres, then you vote for me. Support me. Because I know the problem didn't begin with Ritchie Torres and it doesn't end with him.

Cheng Li-wun’s discussion last night was inspiring! The event was sold out, and she was well received overall, even though many of the questions were stuck in the logic of the past, not the “miracle” innovation that Cheng said will be needed to chart a path forward. Lots of discussion among the audience afterward.

The First time I was eligible to vote was 2016, when I supported Bernie Sanders running in the Democratic Primary. But then I saw how his own party conspired against him in collaboration with Hillary Clinton. I saw how Obama went after Edward Snowden just for exposing the surveillance state, I knew right there and then: The Democratic Party IS the Republican Party.