I'll be attending the amazing NIH Career Symposium. Let me know if you're planning to attend so that we can say Hi! 👋 Or register now and join me at the event! whova.com/portal/registratio…

This guy Feeding the birds and then this happened...

BREAKING: A Florida meteorologist just went on air and said he can’t accurately report the weather anymore, because Trump’s DOGE cuts gutted the satellite data he relies on. We’re not just defunding science, we’re sabotaging public safety. And for what? So a billionaire surveillance firm can get another contract while Americans can’t even get a hurricane warning on time?

Professor Bob Goldstein helps build 1,000 🔬 for NC schools!. 👏👏👏 unc.edu/posts/2024/09/25/bio…

Petition to Reverse the NIH Indirect Cost Cap (NOT-OD-25-068) - Sign the Petition! chng.it/LqG8zPTbkF via @Change

Scientists are now organizing events, called Stand Up for Science, on 7 March in Washington, D.C., and state capitals. So far, they have attracted more than 100 volunteers from some 30 states who are hoping to rally support for research as a public good. scim.ag/41jRwd1

As a scientist, taxpayer, and entrepreneur working to develop a model of basic research in the private sector without NIH funds to accelerate/grow the path to effective human therapeutics: I think the NIH should expand rather than contract support for basic research AND that virtually all aspects of NIH funding of the same should be reformed so that every public dollar goes further.

This is what happens when you wring out a wet towel while floating in space. 📽: CSA/NASA

The academic job market x.com/tradingMaxiSL/status/1…

Dancing bear street art

Magpie following a cat pretending it’s not

Ha! taylor.town/exciting-new-way

The front page of tomorrow's @dailytarheel – I shed many tears while typing up these heart-wrenching text messages sent and received by UNC students yesterday. Our campus was on lockdown for more than three hours. Beyond proud of this cover and the team behind it.

Day 30 of great biology papers. 🎆The final day.🎆 "General Nature of the Genetic Code for Proteins," by F. Crick, S. Brenner, L. Barnett & R.J. Watts-Tobin (1961). This paper is, in my opinion, the most impressive in the history of molecular biology. Here's why... **** When the structure of DNA was solved in 1953, molecular biology was a relatively barren landscape. By that, I mean that messenger RNA had not yet been discovered, nobody was quite sure whether there was any link between DNA and proteins, and there were zero technologies to isolate a gene, let alone sequence one. And yet, just 8 years after that seminal paper, these four scientists used a simple experiment — and fragmentary evidence — to correctly determine that... 1. Each amino acid in a protein is encoded by a triplet code... 2. The letters in this code do not overlap (e.g. AUGACC is read by the ribosome as 'AUG' and 'ACC,' rather than 'AUG,' 'UGA,' 'GAC' etc.)... 3. There is a start codon. Again, they discovered all of these things in the absence of tools to sequence DNA, or to compare a DNA sequence with a protein's amino acids. But before I tell you how they did it, I want to set the scene. The year 1961 was, essentially, the annus mirabilis for molecular biology: - In May, two separate groups reported that they had isolated and proved the existence of messenger RNA, and they postulated that it probably carried information from DNA to proteins. - Jacob and Monod argued that there are two types of genes: Those that encode proteins, and others that regulate gene expression. - Marshall Nirenberg showed that a chain of RNA containing the letters "UUUUUUUUUUUU" encoded a protein filled with phenylalanine amino acids, thus demonstrating a profound, initial insight into the genetic code. (See the excellent review by Matthew Cobb: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…) With these prior experiments in mind, Brenner, Barnett, Crick, and Watts-Tobin set out to understand how, exactly, the genetic code works. Their experiments began with a bacteriophage that infects bacteria, called T4. When these bacteriophage are doused with mutagens, and their genetic material is altered, they sometimes lose their ability to infect bacteria. Now, there is also a dye, called acridine, that causes single nucleotides to be added or deleted from a piece of DNA. This is quite important, because most other mutagens just randomly change sections of DNA. But acridine always adds or removes just one nucleotide. So Crick put these two things together and had a brilliant idea. He took a T4 bacteriophage, exposed it to acridine, and found that it had lost its ability to infect E. coli. This strain was called FC0 — Francis Crick Zero. But then, he (and the others) used acridine to add or remove more letters in the bacteriophage DNA until it regained its ability to infect bacteria. If they added one base and then removed one base, the phage infected the bacteria. If they added two bases, the phage did not infect bacteria. If they added three bases, the phage infected bacteria. From these observations, they argued that the genetic code must use triplets to encode each amino acid. It was a brilliant takeaway, based on partial experimental evidence. From the paper: "The simplest postulate to make is that the shift of the reading frame produces some triplets the reading of which is ‘unacceptable’; for example, they may be ‘nonsense’, or stand for ‘end the chain’, or be unacceptable in some other way to the complications of protein structure." Even though the "combination of mutations strongly suggested that the code was based on units of three bases, the experiments could not prove that to be the case – a code using groups of six bases was consistent with the results," writes Cobb in his review. "This, however, would raise all sorts of problems by massively increasing the number of either meaningless or degenerate sequences (there would be 4096 possible combinations of bases, rather than a mere 64). As Crick later put it, this was 'hardly likely to be taken seriously.'" In his classic book on the history of molecular biology, The Eighth Day of Creation, Horace Judson called this experiment, "a classic of intellectual clarity, precision and rigour." And I agree. Thanks for reading this series! Paper: nature.com/articles/1921227a… Full text: labs.bio.unc.edu/Goldstein/1…

Best way to understand a plot is to build one! Handy web-based resource to quickly generate most common data graphics in biology. #alluvialplot #bioinformaticsfordummies bioinformatics.com.cn/en

Come build a career in agroecosystem modeling at @PurdueAgronomy ! MSc and PhD opportunities currently available. @ASA_CSSA_SSSA, @AgronomyCanada, @CropLifeIntl

90% of molecular biology is pipetting very tiny amounts of clear liquids from one container to another. The other 10% is doing math on paper towels. Some days I think I should have listened to my mother and become a wizard.

I'm catching up with all my pending reading/watching, so here, for your viewing pleasure, this hugely entertaining (and educational) conversation from 2016 between Noam Chomsky and Yanis Varoufakis that is really making my day. youtu.be/szIGZVrSAyc

I have to look at a ridiculous number of visualizations to find good examples of folded chromosomes for my modeling paper (in preparation) #3Dchromatin #chromosomes

9 tips for managing time in grad school Fresh off the press, I wrote an article for ASBMB highlighting 9 tips I’ve found helpful when managing time in grad school. Here they are!⬇️