Software engineer

Joined June 2024
67 Photos and videos
What a clusterfuck 🤡
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.
8
I just can’t imagine how any business, with even a trace of survival instinct, can rely on centralized, closed-source LLM providers after that. It is just so easy now to imagine a complete ban on all models with a single fucking directive.
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
1
5
Wow!
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Claude models is not affected. We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Read our full statement: anthropic.com/news/fable-myt…
4
I wonder how easy will it be to get back to opus after two weeks of fable usage
4
The interesting thing about loops is that they require spinning up multiple sandboxes (I can’t see how you can get away with using only one). That consequently means your AI consumption pricing model changes from a subscription to an API pricing model, and it basically makes any work you do 10x more expensive. The bare minimum budget to do something meaningful in that setup is somewhere between 2k and 3k per month. That is not achievable for ~90%
Here’s your monthly reminder that you shouldn’t be prompting coding agents anymore. You should be designing loops that prompt your agents.
9
How can I learn more about the guardrails Salesforce is using with claude? Incidents are down 5%, PR numbers are up 79%. If true, it must be studied.
32
Is it only me or Opus 4.8 is noticeably faster than 4.7 in Claude Code on xhigh/max?
25
For all of us screaming at our agents 😂
here’s my little side project, run npx devrage to find your numbers and breakdown. it just reads your transcripts, code is here github.com/gricha/devrage
1
36
The mother of all PRs
We should start a polymarket for when it finishes. github.com/openclaw/openclaw…
1
24
I've been using html instead of md for the last few weeks, and it’s hard to overstate how much better it is.
1
27
Funny thing, @chamath was talking about exactly this kind of deal on the All-In podcast five days ago.
We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity. This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.
28
They should have waited until the end of May, when OpenAI is no longer doubling Codex limits
Replying to @claudeai
Effective today, we are: 1) Doubling Claude Code’s 5-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, and Team plans; 2) Removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max plans; and 3) Substantially raising our API rate limits for Opus models.
38
I can't shake the feeling that AI isn't actually replacing SaaS. It's more like it's replacing things that are either not very good products or shouldn't have been SaaS in the first place.
Extreme levels of cope in the reply section here from employees at SaaS companies that don't want to lose their job SaaS stocks went down 80% for a reason Obviously there will be SaaS that remain and new SaaS but many are just an hour or a day of work to replace with AI I already built my own screenshot service (for social media images), image resizing for all my sites, NSFW content moderation, community content moderation, uptime monitor with status pages, automated backup service etc Before I paid for all those SaaS!
1
60
God help us all!
1
31
This is how I talk to claude now 😂
1
23
It would be so good if @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI had a family plan. And it would be absolutely fine if codex and code are not included. I just want to give my family access to the better models, image generation, deep research, etc.
141
github if it were a turbo pascal 7.0
github if it were a winamp skin
1
177
I'm curious how much of Github growth is coming from free accounts. It's a bit ironic: offer an amazing service for free, hit a few incidents after sudden 30x growth, and suddenly everyone starts dunking on you.
1
72
AI has almost killed YouTube programming tutorials, which sucks because they used to be the easiest way to learn how to build something yourself.
26