Growing list of covid era oddities. This is by no means exclusive - I am sure I am leaving some out and many of these have nested problems beneath the surface but the purpose of this is to capture an incredible list of issues that demand explanation at the very least Thread

i came to the conclusion that this story is so awful that we have no way to punish it. to commit to an appropriate measure of justice is beyond our willingness to do it.

If your ethics are conditional, you have no ethics. By their own admission, the authors of Proximal Origin knew at the time of publication that Fauci, Farrar and Collins (i.e., "Jeremy and the email squad") should have been acknowledged in Proximal Origin.

so much of what one hears these days is outright inversion. every bill, initiative, and ideology winds up being the exact opposite of that which it purports itself to be to the extent that it no longer even seems the slightest whit cynical to presume that the “everyone gets a kitten bill” would result in the state barging into your home and shooting your dog and then probably raising your taxes over it. and nowhere does this word salad of opposite day go more rancid and societally e coli riddled than the “social justice” ideas of “correcting structural isms” and “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” let us simply call a spade a spade: the long march of this instruction of ideological inversion through the institutions of the west has become, of its own right, an obsessive and vicious cult that stands anathema to ideas of rights, liberty, justice, and equality. it has become the precise system of embedded and unavoidable structural prejudice that it purported to oppose, just another “antifa” gone distinctly “fa” and the output of this disastrous misapprehension of reality has become so blatant that it takes a special kind of willful to ignore it.

@RandPaul DOCS: hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/… "SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

It is criminal that our government enabled a bat virus to infect and spread between humans. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a bigger betrayal of our species. It is equally troubling that the mad scientists who did this then gaslit all the people of the world about it, including those who CORRECTLY interpreted the evidence. Then, of course, the very same monsters amped up fear of the Covid frankenvirus and steered the panicked public away from safe medicines, and toward an obviously dangerous gene-therapy which they falsely called a vaccine in order to lure us into acceptance. These are among the greatest crimes EVER committed against humanity. We now have persuasive evidence of everything I have said above. If we don't correct the record and hold the perpetrators to account, this pattern will happen again, and again, and again--shortening our life expectancy, and degrading our quality of life each time that it does. This is our Nuremberg moment. We can not simply move on from this ghastly chapter of history. We must finish it. @brownstoneinst

What the pandemic laid bare for the world was the distrust in our scientific institutions. When leading figures promoted narratives that suited their interests and dismissed evidence to the contrary, it exposed what many of us who spent our lives inside the system already knew: there is a crisis in science. Everyone who has spent enough time in science knows there are countless examples where narratives replaced evidence, dissent was discouraged, and corrections and second-guessing never occurred when the facts changed. This is not unique to COVID. The same problems permeate neuroscience, metabolic health, longevity, cancer, immunology, and many other fields. The solution is transparency and objectivity above all else. We cannot continue funding institutions that fail to uphold those principles while expecting the public to trust them.

💥 BOOM 💥 I’ve gone fugue state for many months and it’s paid off. I am off to @CannMedEvents On Wednesday I will present a novel method to amplify DNA that greatly improves the information content, accuracy, the sensitivity and the spectral bandwidth of over 1 million qPCR instruments currently installed in the field. The patent and trademarks have been filed. It’s reveal time. CannMed is the best place to present breakthroughs like this as it’s a collection of the most intelligent divergent thinkers in medicine. For those interested in this field…. Bring your FRET/quantum hat… Bring your thermodynamics hat… Bring your combinatorics hat. Bring your AI hat. You won’t need much of a polymerase hat as the new method works with all classes of polymerases including the isothermal ones we love for POC but detest for lack of multiplexing. Those days are now over and there is a clear path to 5->20 color LAMP. You read that correctly. We are no longer talking 4-6 color qPCR but 40-60 colors. We’ll touch on all 4 topics above and how we just LOG expanded the bandwidth of the current 1M qPCR instrument install base with only clever wetware, AI and a little bit of dumb luck. And it delivers more information , not less. Come to Lake Tahoe Monday-Thursday. You won’t regret it. It’s our 10th year and the event gets glowing reviews year after year Yes. It’s not a cheap biz expo. It’s a ConfCation. We live large while we learn from masters as that is the essence of life. The hotel pricing has gone into scarcity pricing but the conference still has day passes. cannmedevents.com

If they lied to you while enforcing an action, they will almost certainly lie to you about the results of that enforcement. I’ve spent 25 years studying how rhetorical coercion and fear-driven gullibility operate together. Ignorance is not merely a passive condition — rather, it is an active process.

My talented friend @MichaelPack_ has produced a great documentary about the lockdown dissidents & the silencing of science during the covid pandemic. So much harm caused by the lockdowns, school closures, and mandates could have been avoided. I'm working now to reform public health and science so nothing like that ever happens again. @WSJopinion

This is worth a listen. It is mind numbing to think that what happened with COVID was a global crime against humanity and that no one has been held to account. The fact that Gates and Fauci are still walking free is incomprehensible.

Remember when fact chokers tried to claim linearized DNA is non functional upon transfection. They lied

Delta killed a lot of people in the first year after the vaccine, yes. Vaccine had zero impact to speak of. - what the CDC (and 5 hospital networks they assessed) did was take the MCoD assignments to Covid and (by license, with MCoD) assume that these were the unvaccinated - along with any 'unknown' status, and that is how they boosted the "only the unvaccinated are dying" illusion. Now we have 2,000 people per week dying to the excess - with no Covid to speak of... and it is a direct result of the vaccine and the maliciousness of these people. Now pharma is paying specific actors to attack and censor those who derive this from the data. The class action lawsuits cannot come fast enough. They won't be able to reclaim all the Blood-BMS's and Vacation Homes of these pharma agents - but they have forever lost credibility. In 10 years, the BMW's, Mercedes, and Vaction Homes will all be gone - but their souls will still be filled with the filth accumulated in subservience to the Empire and Party.

TRAILER: New documentary from @WSJ on Great Barrington Declaration, Twitter Files, and Covid dissent! Full doc dropping next week.

The Cell paper from May, 2026 has a critical omission. cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092… Can you believe that in the human cohort they did not provide the COVID vaccination status of the people who developed or did not develop lung cancer?? Imagine that. This is important because the cohort developed severe COVID related respiratory illness at a time when most people were vaccinated. If the vast majority of those who became severely ill were vaccinated, you have to ask the question why they became so sick and are they representative of the general population. I would say we do not understand why the vaccine didn’t prevent severe respiratory illness in those people. I would say they do not represent the vast majority of individuals in the general population. Instead of being dismissive, it is important to be honest and open about what we know and what we do not know. Please tell me how the journal Cell published that paper with no mention of the COVID mRNA vaccination status of the human cohort. I would add, and I have said this before, that the COVID mRNA vaccines increase PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Of course this makes the tumors more sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade. But why not address PD-L1 some other way like epigenetic drugs, chemo or radiation, agents that actually have an anti-tumor effect. Increasing PD-L1 by using agents that do not have an anti-tumor effect is by itself an immune evasion tumor promoting effect. BTW, this is shown in the October, 2025 Nature paper whose discussion reads like marketing. nature.com/articles/s41586-0… Both NSCLC and melanoma respond to immune checkpoint therapy much better than other tumors with possible exception of MSI-high tumors. Melanoma already has approved use of interferon therapy that is part of the COVID mRNA vaccine mechanism in that Nature paper. Why not use IFN. Oh it’s because it’s pretty toxic. The strategy suggested in the Nature paper has issues. But, I did say it is OK to conduct clinical research with informed consent within a population that has very different risk:benefit considerations from the general population. Oh, but we don’t have informed consent for the COVID mRNA vaccines as I said under oath a couple of days ago I don’t believe we have informed consent. x.com/humanspective/status/2…

And those who participated in this violation of informed consent will spend the rest of their days burying any hypothesis of that reminds them of the crime.

Ludwig von Mises's most enduring contribution to economics is the calculation problem. Socialism fails, he argued, because a central planner without market prices cannot calculate. Strip away prices and you lose the only valid measure for weighing one use of labor or a commodity against another. The planner is left to guess. Friedrich Hayek, his protégé, took the point further. A price, Hayek showed, is not merely an accounting figure. It is how a society gathers the knowledge scattered across millions of minds assessing billions of data points. Price is total knowledge, aggregated into a single number. The vaccine era — the years since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act — exposes a failure neither man foresaw. Let’s call it the calculation problem under regulatory and epistemic capture. Socialism abolished the price outright. Capture in a mixed market economy is subtler: it leaves a price standing and corrupts it from within until it is worse than meaningless. Mandates, government purchasing, and insurance rules guarantee sales no matter what the product actually does. School-entry laws force sales upon captive customers (e.g. children who want to go to school). Liability protection removes the price that disciplines a defective product — the damages a court would otherwise make the manufacturer pay. The buyer is compelled and the producer is protected so no meaningful price can form. Making matters worse, price aggregates what buyers believe about the thing they buy, however regulatory and epistemic capture distort those beliefs. The FDA launders bad data on behalf of the manufacturers and declares the product “safe and effective.” Social media platforms erase the testimony of the injured. Academic journals censor scholars who dissent. Universities blacklist professors who challenge the conventional narrative. So society’s dispersed knowledge about the product and its defects never gets properly communicated or aggregated. Creating a market for vaccines again would require removing all mandates, repealing liability protection, rescinding insurance rules, and ending government purchasing programs. However creating a MEANINGFUL price (that communicates the risks and benefits of the product to society) would also require stopping regulatory capture and epistemic capture (i.e. control of the journals and universities by Big Pharma).

It is surreal to watch this video and be reminded what the Covid tyranny was like just a few years ago. We can’t let these people do this ever again.

Dear Maryanne: Your article is a part of the US Congressional Record but is censored on LinkedIn. Wafik @SenRonJohnson

No. The origin of covid is actually the most interesting and important scientific question in infectious disease. The fact that no one in the field wants to discuss it speaks volumes.