#来自矿池消息一波又一波 第二名 AntPool：18.18% 第三名 SpiderPool：16.53% 差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 这意味着什么？ 蜘蛛靠 NAT 双挖从第五冲进前三，和第二名之间差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 ❓ AntPool 再不分发 NAT，算力还能守得住第二吗？

#来自矿池消息一波又一波 第二名 AntPool：18.18% 第三名 SpiderPool：16.53% 差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 这意味着什么？ 蜘蛛矿池因是第一位官宣并执行分发 $NAT 给矿工，双挖使蜘蛛矿池从第五冲进前三，和第二名之间差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 ❓ AntPool 再不分发 $NAT，算力还能守得住第二吗？

📰 Foundry USA at ~27% of Bitcoin hashrate. Again the "centralization" debate. Is it a threat to Bitcoin- or just capitalism doing its thing? Quick context (7 Jun 2026): Foundry ~27% | Antpool ~18% | F2Pool ~11% | ViaBTC ~9% Top 2 pools alone ≈ **45%** of network hashrate 🔴 That's the number people should watch- not Foundry in isolation. ⚖️ "Centralization" argument: • One entity picks tx for nearly 1 in 4 blocks • Censorship risk if pressured (OFAC-style filtering) • Block template control concentrates with pool operator • 51% attack still unrealistic- but soft power is real 🏭 "It's just the market" argument: • Foundry won on fee (~0.85%), uptime, US institutional demand • Miners are rational- they follow margin, not ideology • Stratum V2 / Ocean / Braiins exist for sovereignty-minded miners • Bitcoin survived GHash.io at ~51% in 2014. Memory market reaction work 🧰 My take: Foundry at ~27% isn't an emergency. It **is** a reminder. → If 2 pools ever sit above 40% combined with identical block policies- that's a conversation → Home/small miners switching to Braiins (~2%), Ocean (~2–3%), or Trustpool (~1%) won't move the needle alone- but diversity is cumulative → Running your own node Stratum V2 = actual decentralization, not tweet threads about it What actually helps: ✅ Smaller pools with transparent stats ✅ Miner-side block template construction ✅ Don't treat pool choice as set-and-forget What doesn't: ❌ Panic-posting "Bitcoin is dead" ❌ Picking a random tiny pool with zero stats ❌ Ignoring the issue because "fee is lower" 📊 Jun 2026 reality: margins are thin (~$6/day @ 200 TH/s, BTC ~$62K). Most miners pick fee first, philosophy second. Understandable- but that's HOW we got here. Is Foundry at ~27% dangerous for Bitcoin? 🔴 Yes- too much concentration 🟡 Monitor, not panic yet 🟢 No- market will self-correct Vote reply why 👇 @foundryservices @ocean_mining @Braiins @AntPoolofficial #Bitcoin #BTCMining #Decentralization #Foundry #Hashrate #CryptoMining #MiningPools

#AntPool ants are key to understanding a "collective" unconscious and collective co-consciously created collaborations on the level of no longer needing individual nation states. Corporations and everyday citizens rising up to take on the responsibilities often only taught to a select few. #Conspiracy4Love #Interconnected #CollectiveOfPsychics #TeamEdward #AidansRedemptionTale

🔧 Stratum V2- marketing buzzword or real upgrade? Short answer: real- if you care WHO builds your block. Stratum V1: pool picks transactions. You hash. Stratum V2: you CAN pick transactions. Pool coordinates. Why it matters Jun 2026: → Censorship resistance (OFAC tx filtering debate) → Tx fee optimization- mempool hot = more sats → Encrypted miner↔pool connection Who supports it: • Braiins- co-author, production-ready • Ocean- decentralization-first • Foundry / Antpool / Trustpool- mostly V1 still 🧰 Should YOU switch? → Home miner <50 TH/s: nice ideology, marginal $ impact → Node runner / sovereignty maxi: yes, Braiins → Fleet chasing $/day: fee % power rate matter more today Stratum V2 = long-term network health tool, not instant profit button. Running V2 already? Which pool? 👇 @Braiins @ocean_mining #Bitcoin #BTCMining #StratumV2 #Decentralization #Braiins

🛤️ From ASIC to crypto card- full path (June 2026) Mined BTC sitting on an exchange? You're skipping half the stack. Here's the complete pipeline. 6 steps. pool-btc.com toolkit. 1️⃣ ASIC → POOL → Pick pool by net fee min payout (not marketing) → Trustpool 1% · Foundry 0.85% · Antpool flexible → Check: pool-btc.com 2️⃣ POOL → WALLET → Payout to YOUR hardware wallet, not exchange → Ledger / Trezor / Keystone- pool-btc.com/wallets → Rule: if you don't hold keys, you don't hold BTC 3️⃣ WALLET → EXCHANGE → AML check BEFORE sending (BestChange- OFAC free) → Pick exchange by withdraw fee, not trading fee → Kraken/Binance/Bybit- pool-btc.com/exchange 4️⃣ BTC → STABLE (optional) → Convert to USDT/USDC for card top-up → Watch conversion spread (often 0.5–2.5%) → mempool.space- send when fees are low 5️⃣ TOP UP CARD → Transfer USDT/USDC to card balance → KAST / Wirex / EMCD- low top-up spread → pool-btc.com/cards 6️⃣ SPEND → Real NET cashback = headline − FX − conversion → S-tier cards: Coinbase, KAST, Ready Lite → Count NET, not marketing "8%" ⚠️ KYC reality check: Full no-KYC end-to-end doesn't exist for cards. Minimum path: pool (no KYC) → own wallet → P2P (Prosto/Lime/BestChange) → card with light KYC (KAST, Tuyo) 💸 Full path cost example @ 0.003 BTC/month: Pool fee 1% withdraw $3 conversion 1% card FX 1% ≈ ~$8-12 total friction Map YOUR path 👉 pool-btc.com Which step costs you the most? 👇 #Bitcoin #BTCMining #CryptoCards #SelfCustody #Crypto2026 #CryptoToolkit

#来自矿池消息一波又一波 第二名 AntPool：18.18% 第三名 SpiderPool：16.53% 差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 这意味着什么？ 蜘蛛靠 NAT 双挖从第五冲进前三，和第二名之间差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 ❓ AntPool 再不分发 NAT，算力还能守得住第二吗？

#来自矿池消息一波又一波 第二名 AntPool：18.18% 第三名 SpiderPool：16.53% 差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 这意味着什么？ 蜘蛛靠 NAT 双挖从第五冲进前三，和第二名之间差距只有 1.65 个百分点。 ❓ AntPool 再不分发 NAT，算力还能守得住第二吗？

Das Hardfork Argument zählt ja nur so weit, wie man es sehen will. Letztendlich entscheidet die Masse. Tragen Nodes und Miner einen Fork mit? Dann ist es eben Konsens. So funktioniert dann halt Netzwerk. Bitcoin ist natürlich künstlich begrenzt - er ist wie alle Kryptos künstlich. Es gibt immer Code und Protokoll. Die Argumentation "was kopiert werden kann ist nicht knapp" ist halt sehr oberflächlich. Du kannst ohne Ende forken. Aber es ist halt nur das Original, bzw nur die Chain, wo der Konsens herrscht die, die effektiv überlebt. Das zeigt ja $BCH ziemlich deutlich. Über Miner bzw Pool-Konzentration kann man sprechen. Die Frage ist was passieren würde, wenn zB Antpool sagt "So wir haben da ein paar Anpassungen. Es gibt jetzt 56 Mio BTC" Zieht das Netzwerk mit? Aus heutiger Sicht würde ich vermuten das nicht. Nochmal: ich will dich nicht überzeugen und ich bin auch kein BTC Pressesprecher. Am Ende entscheidet die Masse ob und was sich durchsetzt. Ich sage nur: manchmal passen auf neue Technologien, Ideen oder was auch immer, die alten Schablonen nicht.

🧰 My full Crypto Toolkit 2026- mining edition Not a sponsor list. Stuff I actually check before connecting hashrate or moving sats. Updated Jun 2026. ⛏️ MINING POOLS Match pool to size first, fee second. • Foundry (~27%)- FPPS ~0.85%. Fleet scale, US ops. • Antpool (~18%)- PPS 2.5% or PPLNS 0%. Most docs online. • F2Pool (~11%)- PPS/PPLNS since 2013. Multi-coin. • ViaBTC (~9%)- 2% PPS, 0.001 BTC min, solo option. • Braiins (~1.5–2%)- Stratum V2, 0% PPLNS or 2% FPPS. • Ocean (~2–3%)- TIDES, decentralization-first. • Trustpool (~1%)- 1% PPS , 0.001 BTC min, daily payouts. Small share, fine for <100 TH/s. 💱 EXCHANGES (low fee, miner-friendly) • Spot withdraw: Kraken, Binance, OKX- compare maker/taker BTC withdrawal fee (~0.00002–0.0005 BTC depending on exchange/congestion) • P2P/off-ramp: depends on region- check spread, not just headline fee • Rule: never leave mined BTC on exchange longer than needed 🔐 COLD WALLETS • Ledger / Trezor- standard for long-term storage • Coldcard- air-gapped, Bitcoin-only purists • Seed phrase: steel backup > paper. Never photo, never cloud. 🌐 VPN / NETWORK • Mining doesn't need VPN for pool connection- latency matters more • VPN useful for: dashboard access abroad, ISP restrictions, privacy on public WiFi • Pick server close to pool stratum endpoint. Ping > privacy for hashrate 📊 HASHRATE MONITORING • Pool dashboard- first stop (1h/24h charts, reject rate) • miningpoolstats.net- cross-check pool hashrate vs claimed • ASIC web UI- temps, fan speed, hw errors • HiveOS / Braiins OS - fleet management at scale • Alert threshold: >2% reject rate or >10% hashrate drop = investigate same day 📐 Quick sanity check (Jun 2026 · BTC ~$62K): 200 TH/s ≈ 0.00009–0.00011 BTC/day gross (~$5.50–6.80) Before optimizing pool fee- confirm power rate. At $0.10/kWh (~$252/mo) fee debate is irrelevant. Toolkit rule: infrastructure > hype. If a tool has no docs, no stats, no support- skip it. What's in your stack that we missed? 👇 @foundryservices @AntPoolofficial @Braiins @ViaBTC #Bitcoin #BTCMining #CryptoToolkit #MiningPools #ColdWallet #CryptoMining #Hashrate #MiningTips

🛠️ 7 free tools every miner should bookmark- June 2026 No subscriptions. No referral traps. Actually useful. From pool-btc.com/useful toolkit 1️⃣ BestChange AML (OFAC- $0) → Check wallet address before off-ramp → 80 coins/networks · Risk Score before you send → Free OFAC sanctions check to start 2️⃣ pool-btc.com Calculator → Gross vs net BTC/day for YOUR hashrate power rate → Pool fee impact in sats, not guesses 3️⃣ Miner Ranking (pool-btc.com/miners-rank) → 40 ASIC models sorted by net $/day → W/TH efficiency at a glance 4️⃣ Pool Comparison (pool-btc.com) → Fees, payout models, min threshold side-by-side → Trustpool, Foundry, Antpool, ViaBTC- neutral data 5️⃣ miningpoolstats.net → Cross-check pool hashrate vs claimed → Block find history · worker count 6️⃣ mempool.space → Fee estimates before moving mined BTC → Block congestion · when to withdraw cheap 7️⃣ Exchange comparison (pool-btc.com/exchange) → BTC withdraw fees ranked for miners → P2P local off-ramp options 🧰 Workflow: Mine → check pool stats (#5) → payout to own wallet → AML check (#1) → compare withdraw fee (#7) → send when mempool is cheap (#6) Bonus (paid): Setapp for Mac miners- CleanShot, monitoring tools. Overview on pool-btc.com/useful What tool saved you money? 👇 #Bitcoin #BTCMining #CryptoTools #FreeTools #MiningPools #Crypto2026

2024年比特币区块奖励减半后，行业单位TH挖矿单日收益从减半前$0.110跌至当前$0.031，累计跌幅72%，大量中小矿工收入跌破电费成本被迫关停。传统市场出清模式下，倒闭矿工空出的算力持续被Foundry、AntPool等头部矿池吸纳，两大矿企算力现已逼近51%控盘红线，算力回暖等同于寡头垄断加剧，威胁比特币去中心化安全。 NAT依托比特币区块数据发行，矿工挖出区块即可免费获取代币，100%筹码全部分配矿工、无项目方预挖，且代币奖励不受比特币四年减半规则约束，为矿工提供永续增量收益。叠加NAT补贴后，矿工综合收入抬升，中小矿场得以守住盈亏线避免离场，从源头防止算力向头部集中。

Exactly. Or else Antpool or Foundry just tell us what we are going to do. Not happening. RDTS is activating whether the large corrupt pools like it or not. They will switch over. You'll see.

@TheJawadDashti Good question — let's clarify exactly what happened with block 501726 (Dec 30, 2017). The block isn't truly "empty". It contains only the coinbase transaction, and that coinbase has an output value of exactly 0 BTC. No subsidy claimed, no fees (there were zero other transactions). The miner who found it got nothing. This is valid under Bitcoin consensus rules. The protocol only enforces an *upper bound* on the coinbase value (subsidy at that height fees included in the block). There is no requirement to claim the full amount. If the miner claims less (or zero), those coins are simply never created — they don't exist and can't be spent by anyone. In this specific case it was almost certainly a bug or misconfiguration in the miner's block template / coinbase generation logic. The software/script they used set the payout to 0 instead of the correct 12.5 BTC. Not "by accident" in a vague sense — a concrete error when constructing the candidate block. Important correction on timing: this was *not* caused by fast blocks. The previous block (501725) took ~3 hours to find. Quite the opposite of rapid production. (Fast successive blocks *can* cause pools to mine with slightly stale templates and miss high-fee txs, but that's a different, usually smaller revenue impact — not a zero subsidy claim.) Regarding AntPool "just before it": the blocks immediately around it from AntPool (visible in the explorer screenshot) had normal rewards. This particular block was mined by an Unknown miner. There have been a handful of similar rare under-claim incidents in Bitcoin history (total lost subsidies across all of them is in the low tens of BTC, not hundreds), almost always from template/software issues. These are operational mistakes by individual miners, not a protocol flaw or common occurrence. Running your own full node (Bitcoin Knots recommended for better control and filtering) lets you inspect the coinbase tx directly and verify these edge cases yourself. Sovereign setups with proper template management make this kind of error far less likely.

Mining coinjoin transactions could become a national security issue for US government in future. Foundry is a bigger problem than Antpool and friends.

I will say this, you present a much better case than Luke over on another thread. The AntPool veto concern is real, but that's the threshold working as designed. It means only uncontroversial changes pass. If a major pool opposes it, the system is telling you it's contentious. Lowering the bar until your proposal clears it isn't solving a problem, it's selecting for your preferred outcome. Calling valid fee-paying transactions an attack is exactly the content-filtering precedent that makes this dangerous. Who decides which valid transactions are attacks next time? Anyway, I do appreciate your reply here. It's the first one that had substance.

🚩 5 signs a mining pool is better to walk away from Tested dozens of pools for pool-btc.com comparisons. Patterns repeat- and they're not always in the fee %. Legit pools (Foundry, Antpool, F2Pool, ViaBTC, Braiins, Trustpool) share one thing: public stats, clear payout rules, track record. When these are missing- pause, don't plug in. 🚩 1. Fee "from 0%" with no model specified 0% PPLNS ≠ 0% FPPS. If the landing page doesn't say PPS /FPPS/PPLNS- they're hiding variance or tx-fee catch. ✅ Normal: "2.5% PPS or 0% PPLNS (miner pays tx fees)" 🚩 2. No public hashrate dashboard Pool can't show live hashrate, worker count, blocks found? Either tiny, broken, or not a real pool. ✅ Normal: Foundry ~27%, Antpool ~18%- stats on miningpoolstats.net and own site 🚩 3. Payout delays >24h without explanation Scheduled maintenance happens. Silence for 48h while your balance grows = custody risk. ✅ Normal: daily payout window (Trustpool 05:00–13:00 MSK, most top pools <24h) 🚩 4. Min payout designed to trap small miners At 20 TH/s (~0.00001 BTC/day, Jun 2026) a 0.01 BTC min = ~1,000 days before first withdrawal. Your hashrate, their float. ✅ Normal: 0.001 BTC min → ~100 days at 20 TH/s. Still long- but not absurd. 🚩 5. Referral hype > infrastructure "Best pool 2026 🚀" posts everywhere, zero GitHub, no Stratum docs, no support channel, anonymous team. ✅ Normal: stratum endpoints documented, Telegram/support ticket, years of block history ⚠️ Red flag ≠ instant scam. Sometimes it's a new pool with lazy docs. But your hashrate isn't a beta test. Before you connect: → Check pool on miningpoolstats.net → Read payout FAQ (model min schedule) → Run 48h on min payout threshold, then scale Caught a red flag we missed? Reply 👇 @foundryservices @AntPoolofficial @f2pool_official @Braiins #Bitcoin #BTCMining #MiningPools #CryptoMining #MiningTips #ASIC #PoolSafety