You are the one claiming you face racism. You talk about how it is not merely discomfort. You don't get to make your own definitions. Words are defined already. When you want to use your own definitions its up to you to give that defintion upfront.

Who appointed you the dean of definitions?

no literally because they’ll pull out english definitions of words and try to force american culture on yeonjun just to try to prove he said something bad then ignore actual koreans explaining its very racist/xenophobic

"Probability opens doors for us and then trips us up. With a handful of simple concepts and definitions, it brings a whole world of problems more under our control but also makes us vulnerable to fallacies we otherwise might never have considered. It is perhaps the defining logic of our time, an era when more and more of our decision-making is based on data and statistical analysis. The Age of Information is often also the Age of Incomplete and Contradictory Information, and the various information sources we depend on are frequently misleading or full of holes. Probability is ultimately nothing more than a codification of our ability to reason with less than perfect information, as we are constantly required to do. Data is wonderful to have, but data can also be manipulated and distorted to tell a story that isn’t true or to suggest certainty where really there is none. Probability can be the antidote. It reminds us—or perhaps provides the language with which we remind ourselves—of the boundaries of our understanding, and it keeps us conscious of the fact that abundant data is not the same thing as knowledge. The era of Big Data must also therefore be an era of Big Probability. But first we need to understand what we’re doing." Page 303

I’m not sure I am. I don’t see it a philosophical question precisely, but more a question of definitions. A democracy as a noun is different from a republic.

In geology, constantly giving definitions of shit that no one asked about is called smaumau tendencies. Nywe nywe psychology. Nywe nywe discomfort. Nywe nywe control. Nywe nywe burden. Nywe nywe vulnerability. Nywe nywe nywe nywe nywe nywe... Tsek, we are fine.

IDC what YOU think it is. The rest of the world goes with the definitions given below. If you personally veived things "in the name of athesim" then that's all you pal. Not the rest of us. I've already shown that athesim doneat have a set belief system for origin of the universe and life. It doesn't attempt to explain anything. It makes no claims. I highly doubt you were an atheist if you can't distinguish between non-belief in a god and Naturalism. I'll leave you with the two images below. I'm done with this weird ass convo. Your Incredulity is clouding your mind to actually understand that you are wrong. Have a good night.

I think its reasonable to assume that participation is required I think I said that not verbatim but closely especially considering the way fan is defined and how its predecessor fanatic is, due to all of the definitions of the words being described as a fan

I told members of my consistory if we adopted overtures six or seven I would file appeals. My delegates opposed six and seven. We were texting about it at Synod. I turned on the video to see what was happening and was appalled by what I saw. I’m not ashamed of or embarrassed by anything I’ve done or said. They could have gone into executive session and turned off the cameras if they felt this offended by people seeing what was said. Chapter 31 of WCF deals with Synods. It’s not a part of our Standards, unfortunately, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t true. That is also dealt with in my appeal because when decisions are not consonant with Scripture they are not to be received in faith. They should have read chapter 31 on the floor. It would have been more informative and edifying than emoting about standing with NAPARC against “far right” young men and agitators. Further, no definitions were provided which would have actually proven helpful. We couldn’t even agree on definitions for words that we condemned as false teaching and heresy. That really undermines everything the study committee is trying to do. Read the synodical procedures. It’s all there.

I believe we have different definitions of civilized… It’s just beginning.

Modern definitions of words: NAZI - Someone who disagrees with a liberal. RACIST - Someone who disagrees with a liberal. FASCIST - Someone who disagrees with a liberal. MISOGYNIST - Someone who disagrees with a liberal. HOMOPHOBE - Someone who disagrees with a liberal. TRANSPHOBE - Someone who disagrees with a liberal. BIGOT - Someone who disagrees with a liberal.

lol @Polymarket doesn’t know that total win and total payout are two different definitions

You have a mental health issue. That isn't the same thing as a neurological developmental disorder. You're trying to argue definitions with an autist you aren't gonna win 🤣

Why did Rep. Scott Perry say Donald Trump is quote: “ending a 47 year war with Iran”. We can do the definitions game later, I’m just curious why a duly elected Republican would say this has been a war for 47 years while you claim it isn’t one at all?

This is clipped from my appeal. The abuse of proper procedure & adherence to our CO is egregious. We don’t need the AARP aka Glaser’s Folly statement which means nothing of substance to anyone due to no definitions. The FV report we did was great. We should have tabled this indefinitely and came back with a strong report in 2028.

Know your definitions part 1

The ironic part is that it could be true based on the lefts definitions for man/woman.

You keep using words that you clearly don’t know the definitions of. 😂

It's a war zone in a dense urban area. 100% it's tragic. Genocide has definitions - don't water it down to meet an agenda.

Isn't that theft? Oh, I forgot your definitions are different from ours. I am old enough to remember Euro-cheating (theft) in Olympic games.