😕 China and the CCP says it's not their fault Americans are buying nitazines and fentanyl from them. That Americans have too much freedom. That the people don't know how to govern themselves. That people don't know what's good for them, so they need the CCP to show them. This is the same ruling elites of China that joke about having an efficient paid-to-order organ donor system - 3 days for a kidney, 5 days for a liver. That they are in a facetious race with Russia, in order to be the first to live to 150 years old - on involuntary organ donors.

I warned people about #Nitazines two years ago... youtu.be/euePG4NgpUo?si=WrOz… Here....we.....goooooooo! 💀 ☠️

just learnt about nitazines😳

Fern documentary on these nitazines ("ISO"), just dropped yesterday: youtube.com/watch?v=euePG4Ng…

No way to really test for a lot of the current cuts like novel nitazines

Nitazines are potent enough you really need a triple quad or at least to run in SIM to detect them, and to do that you need to already know the fragment ions.

Fentanyl test strips don’t detect nitazines or cychlorphine - new, powerful street opioids. A test strip can be defeated by designing chemically unique new synthetic opioids (NSO). The only safe way to keep alive and healthy is to keep away from dangerous drugs.

Purdue pharmaceutical is guilty of two things, aggressive marketing practices (which we celebrate in different industries) and downplaying the potential for dependence & tolerance that OxyContin (and all opioids) cause. OxyContin was one of the best medications for chronic pain that has been made in recent years. I would argue we would have less deaths with OxyContin available (even with pill-mills) rather than Drugwar prohibition and the illicit “black” marketplace with fentanyl, cychlorphine, Nitazines etc.

you’re just proving why criminalisation doesn’t work 😭😭 and “we just need to go harder” is the analysis of a child who knows nothing about this issue. mexico has been fighting a literal fucking war against the cartels for decades, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, and they have achieved nothing. america also has a heavily armed agency dedicated to preventing drugs from entering the country, which stops a lot but can never stop all. and to account for that, criminals send way more knowing some will get through and to maintain their profits, they switch to cheaper, more dangerous drugs like fentanyl and nitazines. all that agency achieves is a huge amount of wasted money, and a huge amount of death and suffering. countries that you may now try and bring up after copying and pasting from ai that criminalise and have low drug use, have a fundamentally different culture to us, and often better healthcare too, so the demand is not there in the first place. in the uk, there is huge demand for drugs because of our culture and widespread poor mental health.

Like I said earlier even with the “overprescription” pill-mill days (which I believe was heavily overstated) we still would have more people alive if their access was the pill-mill OxyContin or other legal opioids, and not the fentanyl, Nitazines laced opioids in the illicit “black” marketplace that we currently have. This is what Prohibitionists are really saying. By continuing to prohibit drugs they are supporting the current reality. What is the current reality? Cartels and street gangs & the corruption, mayhem & murder that comes from all of it. Because once you attempt to prohibit a desired product, the prohibiting of that product doesn’t mean the desired product goes away, in economic terms a market is created, some ambitious entrepreneur (Al Capone famously said I just give the people the product they want) will find someone, somewhere to grow/manufacture that product, the entrepreneurs (Mafia, cartels & street gangs) will then provide that product and turn a profit. After alcohol prohibition everyone should be able to see the natural progression of what happens. Alcohol prohibition created the Mafia. The current Drugwar has created the cartels and the street gangs in the same manner. This is the consequences of prohibition cause & effect. We saw how it worked with alcohol prohibition and we see how it works with Drugwar Prohibition. Milton Friedman a Nobel prize winning economist articulated this very clearly. Tahir is a Prohibitionist. His aims are “noble”. Funny how Alcohol Prohibition was called the “Noble Experiment” The results are clear, prohibition is anything but noble.

Even with the “overprescription” pill-mill days (which I believe was heavily overstated) we still would have more people alive if their access was OxyContin or other legal opioids, and not the fentanyl, Nitazines laced opioids in the illicit “black” marketplace that we currently have.

Purdue pharmaceutical is guilty of two things, improper marketing practices (which we celebrate in different industries) and downplaying the tolerances (addiction is a term I don’t like using) that OxyContin (and all opioids) cause. OxyContin was one of the best medications for chronic pain that has been made in recent years. I would argue we would have less deaths with more OxyContin available rather than the illicit marketplace with fentanyl and Nitazines and other black market drugs.

“Criminalisation does work, we just need to go harder” is the analysis of a child. You can try as hard as you want to eradicate drugs from society, and it will only make them more dangerous. That is literally why America is suffering under a horrific drug death crisis, they have a heavily armed agency dedicated to stopping drugs from entering the country which stops a lot but can never stop all. To compensate for this, criminals just send way more knowing that some will get through. And to maintain their profits, they switch to drugs that are cheaper to produce, like fentanyl and nitazines. Nothing has been achieved here except a lot of wasted money, and a lot of death and suffering. Similarly, Mexico has literally been fighting a war against the cartels for decades, at least 400,000 people had been killed as of 2021, and they are no closer to achieving their goal than they were at the start. Drug enforcement is not a threat to their business, it is only an extra cost. The only way to crush criminal gangs is to eliminate the demand for them by legalising and providing safe and regulated drugs to users and victims of addiction instead. The money saved can then be used to fund mental health and addiction treatment, the things that will actually reduce drug use.

he responded to my claim that no one does fentanyl or nitazines intentionally unless they have no other choice because they have no recreational potential with “does someone force the spliff in your mouth?” 😭 literally proved my point that opponents of progressive drug policy have no idea what they’re talking about

I’m not saying a well-informed person can’t oppose decriminalisation and/or legalisation but all who I have come across always immediately demonstrate they know nothing about the UK’s drug crisis or the Greens’ policy with some shit like “they want to legalise fentanyl”. Fentanyl is almost non-existent in the British drug supply and regardless, the entire point of legalisation is to eliminate harmful adulterants like fentanyl, or drugs actually relevant in this conversation like nitazines. No one does these drugs intentionally unless they have no other choice because they have no recreational potential. Reactionaries just jump to talking about fentanyl because they aren’t capable of defending their indefensible position and it’s the worst drug they can think of to demonise progressive drug policy. Under Green policy, only specific drugs of each category, which can be used safely with the safety information we will provide with every dose, will be legalised while the rest will only be decriminalised, meaning you won’t be punished for using them but they remain illegal to sell. Anyone who understands what fentanyl is could immediately tell you it is not one of the drugs that will be legalised, but reading our policy would tell you that too. And something you almost certainly didn’t already know is that most illegal drugs in the UK are already legal for personal use. The most common and well known drugs are, of course, illegal for personal use. But beyond those, all other drugs are made illegal by the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016, which doesn’t criminalise use. Drugs you have probably heard of like synthetic cannabinoids (aka spice or K2), almost all cathinones (aka bath salts), and salvia are already completely legal to use. So remember that next time you see someone who pretends to know what they’re talking about demonising the Greens for wanting to decriminalise the use of spice, a drug that was never criminalised in the first place.

So now Canada is not a secular state anymore they directly by politics interfere in peoples faith, I won't judge anyone for anything, "Judge not so though shall not be judged", and they rather kill people deviating from the Geneva convention by their MAID program, but "Though shalt not kill is" one of the 10 commandments of the bible, well suits them nice another country to never visit... Not only do they mess with faith, you can refrain from things you don't want, but according to them you can't anymore based on relegion... And they rather kill then heal, breaking the Hippocratic oath reinstated after WW2 something to prevent rogue docs like Joseph Mengele and the Japanese Legion who did things to people unimaginable horrible and to actively prevent Endlösung kind of solutions, which they introduced again through MAID program, seems things are going down hill, you don't have to kill someone you can take away discomfort and pain there are methods of doing that for terminally ill people, I wouldn't exclude nitazines in a low dosage medical setting micrograms u with a downwards leg, not milli but micrograms 5, 10, 15 micrograms with intubation at hand you don't have to suffer if you're in a terminal phase, even with other methods you don't, but killing people because it saves costs and because psychiatry is an absolute failure is not an option IMHO, more a slight slippery slope towards a very nasty kind of eugenetics program that seems to go towards something done before in history and got slightly out of hand to put it mildly; you don't want to go there !!!

Nitazines

🚨Health Alert: nitazenes, a class of highly potent synthetic opioids, are being detected in Missouri. They are appearing in counterfeit pills, powders and vapes often without users knowing. How dangerous are they? Nitazines are 5 to 10 times more potent than fentanyl.

You did this with heroin so we got fentanyl, you did this with fentanyl so we got nitazines, what exactly do you think is going to happen using the same playbook for nitazines? The drug war playbook bans drugs into existence, it’s not the solution, it creates a different problem.

Few years ago Nitazines. Now tranq-dope. Legal Rx pain meds scripts down over 50%. Street drugs just keep coming. When will out Political leaders wake up? We, who use Rx as directed are not the problem! Tranq-dope youtube.com/shorts/TGa97QBv8…