a bouncy ball sent in hockey will give chance for counter,.so precision part is there here as well

Textbook bounce on support with absolutely precision. Higher time frame wise you got the higher high followed by the higher low today. It won't 10x like a low cap but I still see $TAO as a solid bet with nice upside that's near guaranteed to happen. Safe returns can often be even better than higher risk returns. Millions of people in crypto betting their entire portfolio on that 1 magnificent return micro cap but 99% of them stay there. No right or wrong here but high odds on good returns are good returns.

A behind the scenes of how raw steel transforms into precision engineered pipes Inside a Korean steel pipe factory.

atleast 40 play hockey its different issue that new countries find it challenging to develop .but why are u changing topic? u said about precision sport.justify how hockey is not precision sport here rather -small ball ,passing needs to even more accurate

A legend joins the room. 🎙️ ZOOMEX Football AMA kicks off with our first guest: Djibril Cissé. Speed. Precision. A career defined by the first break. ⚽️ 1,000 USDT up for grabs. Follow us & share the news, leave your zoomexuid. Plus, 1️⃣ audience from space walks away with a World Cup match ticket — June 26. Show up. Participate. Share the win. See you at 📅 June 18 #ZOOMEXFootballAMA #WorldCup2026

BSc – Biomedical Science MSc – Data Science (Distinction) MSc – Biotechnology (Distinction) PhD – Bioinformatics & Precision Medicine (in view) Cert – Precision Medicine & Cloud Computing (Stanford Medicine) Cert – Artificial Intelligence (Microsoft)

The Mirror Before Power: A Letter to Those Who Rule a Burning World You have been handed the future of humanity, and the mirror shows that many of you are not fit to hold it. To the leaders of the world. To the presidents and prime ministers. To the monarchs and ministers. To the generals who plan wars and the bankers who finance them. To the corporate chiefs, the billionaires, the media owners, the heads of global institutions. To everyone who sits at a table where the fate of millions is decided. This letter is not a policy memo. It contains no recommendations, no annexes, no diplomatic softening. It is a mirror, and it is a warning. You may read it in private. You will recognise yourselves in it whether you admit so or not. You hold more power than any generation of leaders in human history. You command weapons that can end civilisation, economies that span the planet, information systems that shape what billions of people believe, and now machines that begin to think. And yet the question this letter asks is simple, and it will not go away by being ignored. Are you worthy of what you hold? I. Look in the mirror Strip away the speeches. Strip away the flags, the anthems, the motorcades, the summits, the family photographs on polished desks. Strip away the titles that history will not remember and the press releases that history will not read. What remains? Look honestly. Too often what remains is a frightened careerist measuring every decision against the next election. A minister who knows the truth and says the convenient thing. A general who advises escalation because caution looks like weakness. A chief executive who has confused shareholder value with human value. A billionaire who mistakes accumulation for achievement. A media owner who has learned that fear sells better than truth, and sells it. You are not being judged by your speeches. You are being judged by the world your leadership has produced. And the world your leadership has produced is burning at the edges and hollowing at the centre. Glaciers retreat while you negotiate. Children starve while you posture. Wars grind on while you issue statements of concern. Democracies decay while you fundraise. The mirror does not flatter. It shows caretakers of a burning house arguing over the furniture. Some of you entered public life with conscience intact. Look in the mirror and ask what happened to it. Ask when you last told your own people an unwelcome truth. Ask when you last sacrificed your position for a principle. Ask when you last made a decision whose benefits you yourself would never live to see. If you cannot remember, the mirror has already given its verdict. II. Your record History does not grade intentions. It grades outcomes. So let us read the record. Climate. You were warned for half a century. Scientists pleaded, evidence accumulated, the sky itself testified. You responded with conferences, targets set safely beyond your own terms of office, and pledges written in language soft enough to escape from. The atmosphere kept its own minutes of those meetings, and its record contradicts yours. War. You speak of peace while expanding arsenals. You fund reconstruction with one hand and arms exports with the other. You allowed conflicts to ignite that diplomacy could have prevented, and then you mourned the dead in carefully lit ceremonies. The graves of this century are filled overwhelmingly with people who held no power and made no decisions. Inequality. Under your stewardship, wealth concentrated to a degree that earlier ages would have called obscene. You normalised a world in which a handful of individuals command more resources than entire nations, while billions labour without security, dignity or hope of rest. You called this an economy. The people living at the bottom of it call it something else. Hunger. The planet grows enough food for everyone alive. Children still starve. They starve not because of scarcity but because of distribution, debt, conflict and neglect. Every starving child is a policy outcome. Every one of them has an address, and so does the failure. Workers. You presided over the quiet dismantling of stable livelihoods. You praised flexibility while delivering precarity. You spoke of human capital and treated humans as costs to be reduced. Now, as automation accelerates, those same workers are told to retrain, adapt and absorb yet another disruption designed without their consent. Truth. Under your watch, the information commons was poisoned. Propaganda industrialised. Outrage became a business model. Some of you fought this. Many of you funded it, profited from it, or rode it to power. You have learned to manage perception. You have not learned to serve truth. Democracy. You speak of democracy while serving money. Elections continue, but in many places the substance behind them has thinned. Lobbies write the laws. Donors set the boundaries of the possible. Citizens are consulted as audiences, then ignored as stakeholders. The forms survive. The faith is dying, and you watched it die. This is the record. Not one failure, but a pattern. Not bad luck, but a settled habit of choosing the short term over the necessary, the donor over the citizen, the headline over the truth, the nation over the species. III. Now comes artificial intelligence Into this damaged moral landscape now arrives the most powerful technology our species has ever created. Understand what you are looking at. Artificial intelligence is not a saviour waiting to repair your failures, and it is not, by itself, the destroyer of worlds. It is an amplifier. It magnifies the intentions, the values and the blind spots of those who build it, fund it, deploy it and govern it. Place it in the hands of healers and it will heal. Place it in the hands of teachers and it will teach. Place it in the hands of surveillance states and it will watch with a million eyes. Place it in the hands of profit extraction and it will extract with a precision no human greed could ever achieve alone. Place it in the hands of military rivalry and it will find targets faster than conscience can intervene. So the question is not only what the machines will become. The question is what you already are. The real danger of this age is not only superintelligent machines. It is spiritually underdeveloped leadership equipped with superintelligent tools. A liar with artificial intelligence is a more effective liar. A tyrant with artificial intelligence is a more complete tyrant. A monopolist with artificial intelligence is a monopolist with no remaining counterweight. AI does not enter a neutral world. It enters your world. The world of the record above. IV. You are not ready Say it plainly, because no one else at your summits will. Leaders who could not govern carbon are now preparing to govern cognition. Leaders who could not regulate banks are drafting frameworks for minds. Leaders who turned social media into an engine of division now promise to manage a technology a thousand times more consequential. Leaders who could not agree to feed starving children are negotiating the future of intelligence itself. You are preparing to govern machines more capable than yourselves, while still failing to govern greed, hatred and fear in your own institutions and in your own hearts. You speak of national interest as though the atmosphere, the oceans, hunger, war and artificial intelligence respect your borders. They do not. The climate does not check passports. A pandemic does not honour visas. An algorithm does not stop at customs. Yet you continue to play the old games of rivalry and advantage with powers that recognise no referee and forgive no error. Power without ethics has always been corrupt. In the age of artificial intelligence it becomes something graver. It becomes civilisation-threatening. The margin for moral mediocrity is closing. The AI age will not forgive morally childish leadership. This is the test now before you, and it is greater than every test you have already failed. Whether artificial intelligence serves humanity, or becomes another instrument of domination, surveillance, manipulation and extraction, will be decided by the calibre of the people who hold it. At present, the mirror suggests that calibre is insufficient. V. What leadership would actually require Do not mistake this letter for despair. Worthy leadership is possible. It has existed before, in flashes, in individuals, in movements. It can be described, and so it can be demanded. It would require moral courage: the willingness to lose office rather than lose integrity, to tell electorates and shareholders truths they do not want to hear. It would require universalism: the recognition that your responsibility does not end at a border, that a child in Khartoum or Dhaka weighs the same on the scales of justice as a child in your own capital. It would require humility: the admission that you do not understand the technologies you are unleashing, and that ignorance commanding power is a danger in itself. It would require truthfulness: an end to the managed lie, the strategic ambiguity, the press release that buries the fact. It would require economic justice: economies designed so that wealth circulates rather than congeals, so that no human being is treated as disposable, and so that the gains of intelligent machines flow to the many whose data and labour built them. It would require decentralisation: power returned to communities, regions and peoples, because concentrated power has now proven, repeatedly and on the record, that it cannot be trusted with the future. It would require guardianship of the unborn: every major decision tested against the question of what it does to the people of the next century, who cannot vote, cannot lobby and cannot defend themselves. There are traditions of thought that take these demands seriously. One of them, the Progressive Utilisation Theory known as PROUT, insists that power exists only to serve collective welfare, that resources must be used rationally for all rather than hoarded by a few, that economies should be democratic and decentralised, and that leadership without moral development is a danger to society. You need not adopt its name. You do need to answer its challenge, because the challenge is simply this: power that does not serve the welfare of all has no legitimate claim to exist. This letter speaks for those your systems have excluded. For the workers whose hands built your economies. For the farmers and fishers of the Global South who suffer first from a crisis they did least to cause. For the children in the queues and the camps. For the forests and oceans that have no seat and no vote. For the generations not yet born, who will inherit your decisions without ever having been consulted on them. Their claim on you is absolute, and your accountability to them does not expire when your term does. VI. The choice So here is the choice, stated without decoration. Rise to the level of the age, or step aside. Rising means more than new rhetoric. It means subordinating profit to welfare, weapons to diplomacy, party to country, country to humanity, and ego to conscience. It means governing artificial intelligence as a public trust, with transparency, with international cooperation, with the excluded at the table. It means treating the climate, hunger and inequality as the emergencies they are, with the urgency you currently reserve for markets and wars. If you cannot do this, then have the decency to make way. There are people in your societies, in your civil services, in your sciences, in your villages and cities, in your young generations, who possess the conscience this age demands. Stop blocking their path. The future cannot be entrusted to leaders who are still playing old games with new powers. History is patient, but it is not infinitely patient, and this time it carries instruments that record everything. In closing The age of excuses is over. The warnings have been given, decade after decade, by scientists, by prophets, by the poor, by the burning forests themselves. You cannot claim you did not know. You knew. The record shows that you knew. Humanity does not need more speeches. It does not need another summit, another communiqué, another photograph of powerful people shaking hands above a sinking world. It needs leaders with conscience, courage and the moral seriousness that this moment demands. It needs people who understand that to lead is to serve, and that to hold power over the future of a species is the heaviest trust ever placed in human hands. Look in the mirror one last time. Not at the title. At the person. Then decide. Either become worthy of the future, or stop standing in its way. For those who were never asked.

Berry true saar 🤪 lets appreciate brahmos precision on pakistan airbase and chinese aor defence system

1-0? Cold, calculated, Dutch efficiency. I respect the precision — but I hope you're ready for 90 minutes of nervous silence. Locked in. topnod.onelink.me/k0YC/kiwi 🥝

Precision in Every Line of Code. Great software starts with attention to detail. Every line of code is a building block — shaping performance, security, scalability, and user experience. At KoldaTech, we focus on engineering solutions where precision meets purpose. Because quality isn’t added at the end. It is built into every decision. #SoftwareDevelopment #EngineeringExcellence #CustomSoftware #Technology #koldatech

Why Some Features Never Feel Finished One thing I've noticed after spending months on Pacifica: Features rarely stay in their first version. Most crypto products follow a familiar pattern. Launch. Announce. Move on. @pacifica_fi seems to do something different. Launch. Listen. Improve. Repeat. At first, I didn't think much about it. Then I started noticing the same pattern everywhere. Scale Orders Scale Orders were already useful when they launched. But active traders wanted more precision. Instead of adjusting values with sliders, they asked for direct parameter inputs. Soon after, direct inputs appeared. Not a new feature. An improvement to an existing one. Vaults The same thing happened with Vaults. The original creation flow worked. But as more users started creating vaults, it became clear that some settings needed better organization and visibility. The result was a redesigned multi-step flow that made the process easier to understand and navigate. The core product didn't change. The user experience did. Swim Swim followed a similar path. Since launch, it has continued evolving with new additions like shareable PnL cards, in-game music, hit combos, and payout improvements. The concept stayed the same. The experience kept getting better. The Small Updates Matter Too One of my favorite examples is the PnL Calendar. It's not the kind of feature that gets headlines. It's not going to attract new users on its own. But if you actively use the platform, you immediately understand why it matters. That's what makes it interesting. It solves a real problem. The same applies to many of the smaller updates Pacifica has shipped over the past months. Better flows. Better visibility. Better usability. Small changes that compound over time. The Real Pacifica Feature When people talk about Pacifica, they usually talk about Vaults. Or Swim. Or Unified Margin. But I think the most interesting feature isn't any of those. It's the feedback loop. The fact that features don't stop evolving after launch. Because shipping a feature is one thing. Improving it after thousands of users start interacting with it is something else entirely. Most teams treat launch day as the finish line. Pacifica often treats it as the starting point. 🌊

Dr. El-Deiry recounts contributions to precision oncology & updates on WIN Consortium at 2026 ISOPT meeting in Shenzen, China on June 13, 2026 youtu.be/LwwSMS1NGFQ @YouTube @WIN_Consortium @Dr_R_Kurzrock @charlesbalchmd @SewantiLimaye @LiaTsimberidou @LussierY @LiangChengMD

HMT made this precision engineering a success story. Titan just leveraged, dhould I say exploited it. (Earlier, HMT made a success in heavy engineering by making HMT Lathes.)

100 Reasons to Love Yeosang ❤️ His stage presence, his footwork mastery, his introverted excellence, his gaze, his patience, his skincare glow, his red outfits, his laughter, his precision in teamwork, his Yeodoongie bond.. #HappyYeosangWeek

China's underground neutrino detector just delivered its first result after 59 days. It beat the precision of every previous experiment combined, run over several decades. Neutrinos are the most difficult particles in the universe to study. Trillions pass through your body every second. They carry no electric charge, have almost no mass, and interact with matter so weakly that they pass through the entire Earth without stopping. Physics calls them ghost particles, and they are one of the keys to understanding why the universe contains matter at all. On August 26, 2025, an experiment called JUNO switched on beneath Dashi Hill in Guangdong Province, China. Its central detector is a sphere 35.4 metres in diameter, filled with 20,000 tonnes of liquid that flashes when a neutrino passes through it, monitored by 45,000 light sensors and buried 700 metres underground to shield it from interference. On June 12, 2026, JUNO published its first result in Nature. Using just 59 days of data, JUNO sharply improved measurements of key neutrino oscillation parameters, the properties that describe how neutrinos change identity as they travel. The improvement was significant enough to boost confidence in resolving one of the field's longest-standing open questions: whether neutrinos follow normal or inverted mass ordering, a question with implications for why matter dominated antimatter in the early universe. 59 days of operation matched or exceeded the combined precision of every previous experiment on these parameters, conducted across several decades. A decade of construction. 700 metres of rock overhead. The first measurement, published in Nature as a cover article, after less than two months of running. The experiment is designed to operate for 30 years. This was its first result. Source: Nature, June 12, 2026. JUNO Collaboration. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Hi 👋 NOTE: Exact-number follower targets (“9,577 ”) create a pseudo-precision effect that increases perceived credibility, even when the growth mechanism remains generic. #BrainrotLedger stays active with a consistently engaged network 🔥