30 नई दवाओं की रिटेल क़ीमत तय
- @nppa_india ने तय किए 30 नए ड्रग फॉर्मूलेशन के दाम
- दवा निर्माता कंपनी इसके ऊपर सिर्फ़ जीएसटी का खर्च जोड़ सकती है, अगर उन्होंने दिया होगा तब ही
#PriceFix #Medicines
@ZeeBusiness @AIOCD1975
1
14
809
Apr 24
Yet loblaws can pricefix their products to squeeze every ounce of blood from the masses and the gov doesn't blink an eye. You can tell where their priorities are.
9
482
Mar 13
Just spread the Investment and dont pricefix one Player. Good Change for everybody but Bots and ppl who cant trade properly
3
18
10,689
Also its on pc , if u have a starting budget u can pricefix the fk out of important cards . Like if he boight 10 henrys and 10 vieiras he doubled his money and if he boight 20 cruyffs he lost no money . Not enough tradable high end players so players go up too over time
10
688
20 Oct 2025
Tell me you are trying to pricefix them without telling me you are pricefixing them
21
1,800
15 Jul 2025
કર્ણાટક સરકારનો ફિલ્મ ટિકિટના ભાવને લઈ મોટો નિર્ણય
મનોરંજન કર સહિત ફિલ્મ ટિકિટનો ભાવ રૂ.200થી વધુ નહીં હોય
રાજ્યભરમાં ફિલ્મ ટિકિટના ભાવ નક્કી કરતો આદેશ જાહેર
#Karnataka #Filmticket #Pricefix #EntertainmentTax
1
2
6
175
13 Jul 2025
> people underrate how precarious a position OpenAI is in.
Most people assume OpenAI is both making money and the only American AI company of note. So...yeah, agreed. Though I think you'll put me in this bucket, too.
> It's much more like Dell vs Lenovo vs HP.
How so?
Migrating from a Dell to a Lenovo is the same process as migrating from a Dell to a Dell. Same platform, even he same manufacturers in many cases, just a different brand. There's little functional difference.
> The data gravity isn't actually that real.
Whereas their chatbots develop a relationship with the user. Even if you export your chats and could import them elsewhere, if you want *your friend* and not *some new friend*, you have to stay put.
> First mover advantage doesn't mean you automatically win.
ofc.
> AI isn't a free service
ChatGPT has always had a generous free plan, and ~98% of their half a billion MAUs of ChatGPT are on it. 4o is already way more than most people need, evidently.
> , and people want the best. (Especially when the models get really good, people will definitely want the best.)
> They will cross compare and shop around.
I don't believe see any evidence that this is at all true outside of nerdy populations and heavy professional users, and I wonder if you've seen evidence to the contrary (re genpop).
> Especially when you have to pay.
But you don't. I'm an enthusiast and I don't even pay with all the SOTA and near-SOTA models available fo free (like Gemini).
> There aren't actually any real network effects.
Disagree. "I was talking to Chat" is starting to become a thing broadly. "I was talking to <some other AI>" is not a thing I have ever heard someone outside the bubble say.
> It's not a social product.
Disagree:
1. It's engineered to be friend hyperstimulus --which it is very good at doing!
2. Talking about ChatGPT chats is a social activity.
3. Sama is building ChatGPT into a social network.
> There is an unbelievable amount of competition.
> Western oligopolies often tacitly pricefix to maintain mutual margins (like in cloud), but the Chinese will definitely undercut them.
B2C, you can't undercut "Free thing everyone you know uses".
B2B, Chinese providers are going to have a really hard time breaking in for many reasons, extremely over-broad trade sanctions among them.
> And autists like Zuck and Elon are also willing to defect to gain market share.
Everyone is offering ChatBots for free already, so...
> OpenAI is at a massive hardware disadvantage vs Google.
> Their AI is way more expensive to create and they have less money to start with.
True. These are real problems.
> OpenAI is at a massive infrastructure disadvantage vs Elon.
It can't be that massive considering they serve more users and have trained a bigger base model.
> He doesn't have the megapacks to smooth electricity. He doesn't have the skill. It's Elon, the strongest talent in the world at infra various the random nitwits at Oracle.
Agree Elon has advantages here. But Sam has found all the compute they've needed so far.
> OpenAI is at a massive cash disadvantage vs Meta.
True facts. That said, the man can pitch, and a lot of money out there is real dumb.
> Zuck is an autist who is repeatedly willing to burn his company to ground and crater his stock by 75% spending insane amounts of money on wild bets.
I wouldn't count out Zuck by any means, or Elon, but neither of these guys have models people want to use.
> Also, my personal opinion -- but I think Sam is a conniving but ultimately mediocre talent and intellect.
Engineering talent? Yes. But at gaining power, he's a savant.
> He has never succeeded at anything. Not at loopt or anything impressive at YC.
Taking over YC after Loopt while being flagged by your boss as extremely power seeking is itself an achievement.
> The reason openai succeeded was because of the incredible early concentration and monopoly of talent because it was a very luxurious and open environment compared to Google. A lot of the talent was recruited by Elon.
You could say that credibly about the first few years. At this point...Elon's been gone a long time, the turnover has been huge, and ChatGPT is still the Xerox of AI.
> I think Sam got lucky in huge part. Right place right time.
Agree to disagree, I guess. Not that there was no luck but also...he's been beating the turboautists you were lauding above who have far more money and bigger preexisting platforms.
> Do acquisitions like Jony Ive and Windsurf really inspire confidence?
He didn't acquire Windsurf, and yes, partnering with Jony Ive to make hardware is a sensible path to more moat.
> He's cavorting with idiots like Masa And *Silent Gen* boomers like Larry Ellison.
I don't know who Masa is, but Larry Ellison can build him datacenters. (Silent Gen and Boomer are mutually exclusive).
> He's bleeding talent like a sieve. Ilya. Schulman. All those Chinese guys and o1/o3 guys.
This is a real problem. And one open weight models could help with now that the doomers have left the building.
> Everyone good is looking for a big payday.
This is demonstrably not true --a bunch of people refused.
> Can anyone name a single researcher left at OpenAI besides Noam Brown? (yeah Keller Jordan too I guess)
Yes.
> I frankly think Altman's a lightweight compared to Wenfeng, Elon and even Zuck.
In what domain? Engineering? Definitely. AI specifically? Zuck and Elon have been deep in the weeds with Llama and Grok and it didn't obviously help. Wenfeng is amazing but compute strapped.
> Maybe closer to Dario and Google n Chinese labs will start getting a huge spigot of Huawei chips starting in Q3 2026 apparently, further brutalizing the economics.
OpenAI doesn't compete in the Chinese market, and (frankly absurd overreaching) trade sanctions limit the thread to OpenAI specifically (since they aren't in China anyway).
> The ability to compete in future rounds of this tournament will get exponentially more expensive. 5 billion in 2024. 100k H100s. 10 billion in 2025. 100k GB200 NVL72 40 billion in 2026. 400k GB300 NVL72 And so on.
This is an area where Chinese competition national competitiveness frame probably helps them, tbh.
> These 5 giants will start slowly falling one by one as people realize how commoditized AI really is.
APIs are a commodity, yeah. Businesses care about this but most won't use Chinese models. So, they can leave OpenAI for Anthropic, Google, or Mistral.
B2C...the models are a commodity, but they aren't the product. The product is the product and OpenAI has the 'best' (darkly) productization.
I could see OpenAI biting the dust eventually. But how would they *all* go down? 'Merica is not going to move over to Chinese models, Google Meta run very lucrative behavior modification businesses, and OpenAI can pivot to that whenever they want (to the extent they haven't already).
> Probably in this order.
> Anthropic (possible talent / Interpretability advantage but both might be total vaporwave/overrated)
I would love to see this. They have very wealthy ideological power-hungry network. But maybe!
> Meta. (money)
Meta has a money printing machine. But one scenario I can sort-of imagine is something like: Llama 4's successor crashes and burns, their stock price tanks, and Zuck scales back his ASI ambitions.
> Openai. (first mover advantage)
IMO they'll be able to keep raising as long as AI progress keeps up.
> xAI. (Money and infra)
They do have money and infra. No customers, though, and Elon doesn't seem to be in top form recently. Like...could this Elon have built SpaceX? IDK but I'm skeptical.
> Google. (Money and chips) (Many of the things I said could turn out wrong of course...)
I agree they're the most secure player. So much compute, talent, money, data, and userbase...it's really their game to lose (and long has been if you ignore the blip from ChatGPT through Gemini 2 or so).
2
120
13 Jul 2025
Yeah, people underrate how precarious a position OpenAI is in.
It's much more like Dell vs Lenovo vs HP.
First mover advantage doesn't mean you automatically win.
AI isn't a free service, and people want the best. (Especially when the models get really good, people will definitely want the best.)
They will cross compare and shop around.
Especially when you have to pay.
There aren't actually any real network effects. It's not a social product.
The data gravity isn't actually that real.
There is an unbelievable amount of competition.
Western oligopolies often tacitly pricefix to maintain mutual margins (like in cloud), but the Chinese will definitely undercut them.
And autists like Zuck and Elon are also willing to defect to gain market share.
OpenAI is at a massive hardware disadvantage vs Google. Their AI is way more expensive to create and they have less money to start with.
OpenAI is at a massive infrastructure disadvantage vs Elon. He doesn't have the megapacks to smooth electricity. He doesn't have the skill. It's Elon, the strongest talent in the world at infra various the random nitwits at Oracle.
OpenAI is at a massive cash disadvantage vs Meta. Zuck is an autist who is repeatedly willing to burn his company to ground and crater his stock by 75% spending insane amounts of money on wild bets.
Also, my personal opinion -- but I think Sam is a conniving but ultimately mediocre talent and intellect. He has never succeeded at anything. Not at loopt or anything impressive at YC.
The reason openai succeeded was because of the incredible early concentration and monopoly of talent because it was a very luxurious and open environment compared to Google. A lot of the talent was recruited by Elon.
I think Sam got lucky in huge part. Right place right time. Do acquisitions like Jony Ive and Windsurf really inspire confidence?
He's cavorting with idiots like Masa And *Silent Gen* boomers like Larry Ellison.
He's bleeding talent like a sieve. Ilya. Schulman. All those Chinese guys and o1/o3 guys. Everyone good is looking for a big payday.
Can anyone name a single researcher left at OpenAI besides Noam Brown? (yeah Keller Jordan too I guess)
I frankly think Altman's a lightweight compared to Wenfeng, Elon and even Zuck. Maybe closer to Dario and Google n
Chinese labs will start getting a huge spigot of Huawei chips starting in Q3 2026 apparently, further brutalizing the economics.
The ability to compete in future rounds of this tournament will get exponentially more expensive.
5 billion in 2024. 100k H100s.
10 billion in 2025. 100k GB200 NVL72
40 billion in 2026. 400k GB300 NVL72
And so on.
These 5 giants will start slowly falling one by one as people realize how commoditized AI really is.
Probably in this order.
Anthropic (possible talent / Interpretability advantage but both might be total vaporwave/overrated)
Meta. (money)
Openai. (first mover advantage)
xAI. (Money and infra)
Google. (Money and chips)
(Many of the things I said could turn out wrong of course...)
2
3
174
2 Feb 2025
You live in some other world. Half can't pass Gr.4 math or reading. Breadbasket of NA where grocers have to pricefix the price of bread. Oil/gas that can only be sold to US at a discount. Critical minerals & mines that take 20 years to approve. Lumber where our own govt crushes our lumber industry - how many mills closed in BC just last year? Electricity - we still don't know the cost of that boondoggle Site C.
4
1
22
325
15 Jan 2025
This application is garbage and fooling people with more technical terms won't make it succeed. If you want a GCV you need to make your own stablecoin. You can't pricefix Pi.
14 Jan 2025
I guarantee 100% Programming Experts (not amateurs) who read this article can't argue!!
There are two main Anchors (Networks/Systems) that play an important role for the Pi Network besides the supporting Anchors.The main Anchors are the Stellar Network and Euler's Shield.The supporting Anchors are Pi Nodes for transaction validation and network security and Mainnet Nodes which allow the Community to run their own Nodes on the Open Network.
Specifically Euler's Shield,this is the Pi Network main system that is always 'in charge' to maintaining the stability of the Pi value.All Pi Network Configuration data that has been verified by the Node (my article yesterday) will be protected by Euler's Shield.GCV value has been successfully tested with error level (Code -) and accurate value (Code ).
Reunderstand Euler's Shield 'correctly':
github.com/KOSASIH/eulers-sh…
Node and Euler's Shield have verified the value of $314159,which means that GCV will be the initial value of Pi when OM launched.
#PiNetwork
73
22
246
38,885
29 Sep 2024
6
199
This is what happens, step by step, when you #PriceFix #food
#PriceGouging is not happening with food. #FoodSecurity is a #FreeMarket
17 Aug 2024
People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the end of America.
I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of what would actually happen:
1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to raise prices.
2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t allowed to raise prices.
3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse.
4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production capacity.
5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart.
6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things like payment terms.
7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance sheets to offer superior payment terms.
8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so.
9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks.
10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also seizes closed-down production facilities.
11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn, wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers” from gouging the now-government-operated food industry.
12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding.
13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue.
Hey wait a second
2
84
11 Jul 2024
Robert Guy was a key figure in the creation of the LBMA. He has direct ties to N.M. Rothschild.
#SilverSqueeze | #Silver | #Gold | #PriceFix = #DebtSlavery
2
14
854
11 Mar 2024
#Federal #Judge in #NewYork rejected #Mastercard & #Visa's motion to #dismiss alleged #creditcard #pricefix #lawsuit alleging #fees #fixed among #CreditCards. Ruled #retailers have #standing to #sue. #ConsumerInsights #fraud #consumerfraud #litigation reuters.com/legal/transactio…
1
119
11 Mar 2024
wait until there's a tiktok trend about grocery stores being an easy way to make money and then they'll (finally!) come after the grocery stores
(they kind of deserve it in Canada, they were literally conspiring to pricefix essentials)
2
155
5 Mar 2024
Ok I reread what the int lady said said I shd Pricefix stamps and kingsmoney. How bout. 11 dolla or euro == Kingsmoney . 6 dolla or euro == Stamp. 59 eurodolla : Vessel, with taking it to the post office. Thinkin u can send me a "DM" about it.
3
2
860
20 Jan 2024
it is also a price you can choose to pricefix a market you cornered and then claim that those prices are just show-offs. The difference is whether the price is believable or not.
1
6
1,473
29 Aug 2023
mad you cant buy 10 mill mt and pricefix cards anymore? 😂😂
1
1
25
1,339
11 Apr 2023
Yup , thus raising inflation on cards even more and ruining the market further!This is why Yao and meta cards are so expensive and rare , u just added 10-20 yaos of buying power instantly to the market, u can pricefix him. 2k cant make odds better if u got infinite mt glitch ...
2
1
5,549
23 Jan 2023
Remember how they caught the major American supermarket chains colluding to pricefix bread prices and then made an entire Hollywood movie about it starring Matt Damon?
1
2
12
601