Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Core Care Profile & Digital ID Under the proposed Core Care Profile, an individual’s access to essential services may be linked through a centralized digital identity system. Core Care Categories The profile may include: 1. Depression & Mental Health 2. Smoking Status 3. Alcohol Consumption 4. Transportation Access 5. Food Assistance 6. Utility Services 7. Housing Status 8. Employment Status 9. Education Records 10. Financial Information 11. Healthcare Records 12. Prescription History 13. Vaccination Records 14. Family & Dependent Information 15. Social Assistance Programs 16. Government Benefits 17. Emergency Contacts 18. Digital Identification Credentials Digital ID: The Concerns Supporters argue that Digital ID can make services more convenient, reduce fraud, and simplify access to government programs. However, critics warn of significant risks if such systems become overly centralized. Potential Dangers 1. Loss of Privacy A centralized digital identity could allow governments, corporations, or third parties to collect and combine large amounts of personal information into a single profile. 2. Increased Surveillance When health, financial, transportation, and social service information are linked together, it becomes possible to track and monitor many aspects of a person’s daily life. 3. Data Breaches The more information stored in one place, the more attractive the system becomes to hackers. A breach could expose highly sensitive personal information. 4. Function Creep Systems created for one purpose may gradually expand into others. A Digital ID originally intended for healthcare or benefits could later be used for banking, travel, employment, or other activities. 5. Risk of Exclusion Technical failures, incorrect records, identity theft, or account suspensions could potentially limit access to services that people rely on. 6. Social Scoring Concerns Critics fear that linking personal behavior, financial records, health information, and government services could eventually create systems that reward or penalize citizens based on certain criteria. 7. Reduced Individual Autonomy As more services become dependent on a single digital credential, individuals may have fewer alternatives if they choose not to participate. Questions Citizens Should Ask * Who controls the data? * Who has access to it? * How is it protected? * Can citizens opt out? * What oversight exists? * What happens if information is incorrect? * Can services be denied based on profile data? * Are there independent audits and accountability measures? The debate surrounding Digital ID is not simply about technology. It is about balancing convenience and efficiency with privacy, freedom, security, and individual rights. #DigitalID #CoreCare #PrivacyMatters #DataProtection #CivilLiberties #DigitalRights #FreedomOfChoice #PersonalPrivacy #GovernmentAccountability #DataSecurity #SurveillanceState #KnowYourRights #ProtectPrivacy #TechnologyAndFreedom #CitizenRights #Transparency #DigitalFuture #PrivacyFirst #FreedomMatters #StayInformed
1
4
171
Replying to @SenRickScott
@SenRandPaul @JDVance Rep. Rick Scott, like the targeted community, has been under surveillance for a long time. Please do not allow FISA Section 702 to pass. Warrantless surveillance allows the intelligence community to spy on innocent Americans. #ProtectPrivacy
1
13
🚨PROTECT FREEDOM. DEFEND PRIVACY. SERVE THE PEOPLE. 🇺🇸 For too long, career politicians in Washington have gone along with the global agenda while everyday Americans lose more privacy, more freedom, and more control over their own lives. My opponent voted for: ❌Warrantless surveillance of American citizens ❌Expanded government tracking systems ❌Vehicle kill switch technology mandates ❌More federal overreach and attacks on privacy I’ll fight to protect the constitutional rights of the people of OH-14, not the interests of the DC donor class. ✅Opposing citizen surveillance ✅Fighting government overreach ✅Standing against censorship ✅Protecting your privacy ✅Defending constitutional rights & accountability Northeast Ohio deserves a conservative fighter who puts the district over the donors. ✅Vote May 5 #PickNiki #OH14 #DistrictOverDonors #ProtectPrivacy #DefendFreedom #AmericaFirst #WeThePeople #RetireTheRINO
3
10
304
Replying to @NCOSE
The GUARD Act: The Next Dystopian “Child Safety” Trojan Horse ⚫️ (S. 3062) from Sen. Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO, R-MO), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal, D-CT), Sen. Katie Britt (@SenKatieBritt, R-AL), Sen. Mark Warner (@SenatorWarner, D-VA), Sen. Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT, D-CT), and colleagues is barreling through Congress right now. Sold as protection from risky AI chatbots, the Guidelines for User Age-verification and Responsible Dialogue Act actually builds a sweeping surveillance regime that will reshape how everyone uses the internet. ⚫️ Here’s what it really does: •Requires “reasonable age verification” (government ID, biometrics, credit checks, or third-party databases) for every user of any AI system that generates new responses - not just edgy companions, but search assistants, homework helpers, customer-service bots, and more. •Bans anyone under 18 from “AI companions” (human-like conversational bots) entirely — no appeals, and massive fines ($100,000 per violation) that will make companies over-block everything to avoid liability. •Forces ongoing identity checks tied to real-world data, building permanent databases of who is saying what to which AI. ⚪️ This isn’t targeted child protection. It’s a blunt instrument that sweeps in everyday tools, chills innovation, and normalizes universal digital ID gates across the web. True child safety has never come from government ID checkpoints. It comes from empowered parents, stronger cultural guardrails, meaningful product liability for real harms, and serious investment in youth mental health infrastructure — not another layer of surveillance that drives kids underground and hands their data to brokers and bureaucrats. ⚫️ Follow the power. Who benefits from forcing every American to upload ID or biometrics just to talk to an algorithm in 2026? Not the kids scrolling.
Not parents trying to raise resilient humans. ⚪️ The winners are the institutions that now get to know exactly who is saying what to whom online - the surveillance state, data brokers cashing in on verification mandates, and entrenched tech giants that can afford the compliance burden while smaller innovators get crushed. ⚫️ This is the same failed playbook we’ve seen with age-verification laws and the UK’s Online Safety Act: privacy erosion sold as protection, anonymity destroyed, and real problems (predators, addiction, mental health crises) left unaddressed while the infrastructure for total online control gets built. ⚫️ Reject the GUARD Act.
Demand real solutions that protect kids without sacrificing everyone’s privacy, free speech, and parental rights. #GUARDAct #StopSurveillance #ProtectPrivacy #ParentalRights Primary source: S. 3062 – Guidelines for User Age-verification and Responsible Dialogue Act (GUARD Act), 119th Congress congress.gov/bill/119th-cong…
1
3
186
KOSA: The Next Dystopian “Child Safety” Trojan Horse ⚫️ (S. 1748) from Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn, R-TN), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal, D-CT), Sen. John Thune (@SenJohnThune, R-SD), Sen. Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer, D-NY), and colleagues is pushing hard through Congress right now. Sold as protection from suicide, eating disorders, bullying, sexual exploitation, and addictive design features, the Kids Online Safety Act actually builds a sweeping censorship and surveillance regime that will reshape how everyone uses social media and online platforms. ⚫️ Here’s what it really does: • Imposes a vague “duty of care” requiring platforms to exercise “reasonable care” in design and features to prevent and mitigate a laundry list of harms to anyone under 17 - with platforms facing FTC enforcement and state AG lawsuits if they get it “wrong.” • Forces platforms to disable “addictive” features (infinite scroll, autoplay, rewards, notifications) for minors, default to the strongest privacy settings, offer algorithmic opt-outs, time limits, and heavy parental controls - all while requiring verifiable parental consent for younger users and easy reporting mechanisms that invite mass flagging. • Mandates annual independent audits and public transparency reports detailing user data, time spent, harm reports, and mitigation efforts - creating permanent records of what minors (and by extension, families) are doing online. • Uses broad, subjective definitions of “harm” (compulsive use, depressive disorders, harassment, promotion of certain content) that will push platforms to over-moderate, shadow-ban, or outright suppress vast amounts of speech to avoid massive liability. ⚪️ This isn’t targeted child protection. It’s a blunt instrument that sweeps in everyday social media use, chills innovation and free expression, and normalizes government-backed content policing and data oversight across the entire internet. True child safety has never come from bureaucratic “duty of care” mandates and third-party audits. It comes from empowered parents, stronger cultural guardrails, meaningful product liability for real harms, and serious investment in youth mental health infrastructure - not another layer of surveillance and preemptive censorship that drives kids underground and hands their behavioral data to bureaucrats, researchers, and platforms. ⚫️ Follow the power. Who benefits from forcing every major platform to police speech, collect detailed usage data on minors, and submit to government-style audits just to operate in 2026? Not the kids scrolling.
Not parents trying to raise resilient humans. ⚪️ The winners are the institutions that now get to shape what content is “safe,” the big tech giants that can afford compliance armies while smaller platforms get crushed, data researchers cashing in on mandated transparency, and the surveillance state expanding its reach into every teen’s feed. ⚫️ This is the same failed playbook we’ve seen with the #GUARDAct, the UK’s Online Safety Act, and dozens of state age-verification and design-code laws: privacy erosion and speech control sold as protection, real problems (predators, addiction, mental health crises) left unaddressed while the infrastructure for total online control gets built. ⚫️ Reject the #KOSA.
Demand real solutions that protect kids without sacrificing everyone’s privacy, free speech, and parental rights. #KOSA #StopCensorship #ProtectPrivacy #ParentalRights Primary source: S. 1748 – Kids Online Safety Act, 119th Congress
congress.gov/bill/119th-cong…
3
3
146
The GUARD Act: The Next Dystopian “Child Safety” Trojan Horse ⚫️ (S. 3062) from Sen. Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO, R-MO), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal, D-CT), Sen. Katie Britt (@SenKatieBritt, R-AL), Sen. Mark Warner (@SenatorWarner, D-VA), Sen. Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT, D-CT), and colleagues is barreling through Congress right now. Sold as protection from risky AI chatbots, the Guidelines for User Age-verification and Responsible Dialogue Act actually builds a sweeping surveillance regime that will reshape how everyone uses the internet. ⚫️ Here’s what it really does: •Requires “reasonable age verification” (government ID, biometrics, credit checks, or third-party databases) for every user of any AI system that generates new responses - not just edgy companions, but search assistants, homework helpers, customer-service bots, and more. •Bans anyone under 18 from “AI companions” (human-like conversational bots) entirely — no appeals, and massive fines ($100,000 per violation) that will make companies over-block everything to avoid liability. •Forces ongoing identity checks tied to real-world data, building permanent databases of who is saying what to which AI. ⚪️ This isn’t targeted child protection. It’s a blunt instrument that sweeps in everyday tools, chills innovation, and normalizes universal digital ID gates across the web. True child safety has never come from government ID checkpoints. It comes from empowered parents, stronger cultural guardrails, meaningful product liability for real harms, and serious investment in youth mental health infrastructure - not another layer of surveillance that drives kids underground and hands their data to brokers and bureaucrats. ⚫️ Follow the power. Who benefits from forcing every American to upload ID or biometrics just to talk to an algorithm in 2026? Not the kids scrolling.
Not parents trying to raise resilient humans. ⚪️ The winners are the institutions that now get to know exactly who is saying what to whom online - the surveillance state, data brokers cashing in on verification mandates, and entrenched tech giants that can afford the compliance burden while smaller innovators get crushed. ⚫️ This is the same failed playbook we’ve seen with age-verification laws and the UK’s Online Safety Act: privacy erosion sold as protection, anonymity destroyed, and real problems (predators, addiction, mental health crises) left unaddressed while the infrastructure for total online control gets built. ⚫️ Reject the GUARD Act.
Demand real solutions that protect kids without sacrificing everyone’s privacy, free speech, and parental rights. #GUARDAct #StopSurveillance #ProtectPrivacy #ParentalRights Primary source: S. 3062 – Guidelines for User Age-verification and Responsible Dialogue Act (GUARD Act), 119th Congress congress.gov/bill/119th-cong…

1
2
205
I am deeply concerned about the collapse of democracy hidden behind the term "schedule negotiations" leading up to the vote on the 22nd. We must never grant anyone the right to surveil us. What fills me with the greatest fear and anger is the group, epitomized by Sanae Takaichi, that refuses to soften its hardline stance as it seeks to seize this immense power. "Takaichi, Step Down." These words are not a mere personal attack. They are a rejection of a political method that prioritizes "state control" over the privacy and human rights of citizens—a method that seeks to turn those who voice dissent into targets of surveillance. I ask the media not to report this through abstract frameworks like "anti-war" or "protecting the Constitution." What we fear is the much more concrete and vivid sound of "surveillance" and "oppression" approaching our doorsteps. #StopTakaichiSurveillance #NoToTakaichiAutocracy #NotMyPrimeMinister #ProtectPrivacy #SaveJapaneseDemocracy
🇯🇵🚨 JUST IN: Japan's Prime Minister Takaichi says "ordinary citizens not considered" in the new National Security Council creation bill. The ruling party plans to pass it on April 22 through the committee, then the full House's on April 23. This is dangerous. Spies disguise themselves as ordinary citizens. That means ordinary citizens will become targets of investigation. The government is creating a surveillance machine and telling the public not to worry. That is exactly when you should worry. The people are already protesting. 36,000 surrounded the Diet. Now the government is rushing the bill. No debate. No delay. Just power. Get this in front of as many eyes as possible. Japan is not a surveillance state. Not yet. The people must stop this.
1
87
141
3,200
BAN or oppose mandatory digital IDs. x.com/awakenindiamvmt/status… Risks to civil liberties, privacy, and increased government surveillance. Many fear that centralized digital ID systems, such as those in India or proposed in the UK, create unnecessary tracking of citizens and vulnerabilities for personal data security. Through Microsoft, Gates was involved in the launch of "Seeing AI," which uses computer vision for facial recognition to assist blind users. Bill Gates talks about biometric identification, banking for emerging countries Bill Gates supports the development of digital identification systems, including biometrics and facial recognition, primarily through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to improve financial inclusion, healthcare, and public services in developing nations. While he recognizes concerns about surveillance, he advocates for digital public infrastructure to aid global development, such as the MOSIP open-source digital identity platform. Digital ID Focus: The Gates Foundation has committed funds to digital public infrastructure (DPI), including biometric and civil registry databases, to achieve universal legal identity. Support for Biometrics: Gates has expressed support for biometric advancements, noting their ability to reduce costs in financial services, and has funded projects involving fingerprint scanners. Digital Transformation Support: The foundation has partnered with countries like Senegal to deploy universal digital ID systems. Surveillance Concerns: While encouraging digital adoption, Gates has acknowledged that many people fear digital systems could be used for government surveillance. On February 28, 2023, Bill Gates visited the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) office in Mumbai to meet with Governor Shaktikanta Das. Their discussions centered on financial inclusion, digital lending, payment systems, and microfinance. The meeting highlighted collaboration opportunities for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation regarding public health and economic sectors in India. #BanDigitalIDs #PrivacyMatters #CivilLiberties #SurveillanceState #DigitalIDConcerns #DataSecurity #StopBiometrics #FreedomOfChoice #ProtectPrivacy #EndGovernmentTracking #DigitalRights #PrivacyAdvocacy #NoToDigitalIDs #HumanRights #DataProtection #SurveillanceSociety #ResistDigitalID #PrivacyFirst #TechForGood #EmpowerCitizens #BillGates #DigitalIdentity #Biometrics #FinancialInclusion #PublicHealth #DigitalTransformation #GatesFoundation #OpenSource #UniversalID #SurveillanceConcerns #DigitalPublicInfrastructure #MOSIP #FingerprintTechnology #Microfinance #DigitalLending #HealthcareInnovation #GlobalDevelopment #TechForGood #India #InnovationInFinance #G20 #digitalindia #AI @awakenindiamvmt @DrDev7
RBI Pushes For Face Recognition in ATMs and banks Why should only banks provide feedback? Are the public not stakeholders ? @RBI outlookmoney.com/banking/ban…
1
9
10
289
Replying to @TutaPrivacy
It's worse than that. They are pushing it at an OS level which will just make it easier for both companies & pedos to target the very kids these lawmakers claim to be trying to protect. Epstein's pals must be creaming themselves over this. #ProtectPrivacy youtube.com/watch?v=I6f0evRH…
1
7
257
I truly believe that all celebrities in South Korea should stand together and confront the NTS — not just EunWoo. What’s happening right now is unacceptable, and this absurd situation must be addressed immediately. This isn’t only about one person. This is about fairness, privacy, and justice for everyone. When private information is leaked and reputations are damaged without due process, it sets a dangerous precedent. Silence only allows it to continue. All celebrities should unite, stop being afraid, and take a collective stand in court if necessary. Use your voices, your platforms, and your influence to demand accountability. Fight against what is happening. Fight for what is right. Protect not just yourselves — but the future of the entire industry. Standing together makes you stronger. Justice doesn’t come from staying quiet. It comes from courage, unity, and refusing to accept wrongdoing. 💪✨ #CallingOutAllCelebritiesOfSouthKorea #CelebritiesOfSouthKorea #SouthKorea #TakeAStandSouthKorea #JusticeMatters #ProtectPrivacy #StandForWhatIsRight #CHAEUNWOO #차은우 @CHAEUNWOO_offcl
Eunwoo standing against the bullies of south korea I need to bow to Eunwoo for taking a stand .
1
5
37
1,135
WELCOME TO THE POLICE STATE: Inside ICE's Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods 404 MEDIA: We've obtained material explaining how an ICE surveillance system, called Webloc, works. Draw shape on a map, see all phones available there, follow them home. All without warrant. "This is a very dangerous tool in the hands of an out-of-control agency". MORE FROM THE ARTICLE: A social media and phone surveillance system ICE bought access to is designed to monitor a city neighborhood or block for mobile phones, track the movements of those devices and their owners over time, and follow them from their places of work to home or other locations, according to material that describes how the system works obtained by 404 Media.Commercial location data, in this case acquired from hundreds of millions of phones via a company called Penlink, can be queried without a warrant, according to an internal ICE legal analysis shared with 404 Media. AMERICANS LAST: The Qrazy MAGA Cultists who were apoplectic over Biden monitoring social media will run and hide from this invasion of privacy. The purchase comes squarely during ICE's mass deportation effort and continued crackdown on protected speech, alarming civil liberties experts and raising questions on what exactly ICE will use the surveillance system for Previous administrations, Republican or Democrat, did not dismantle DHS or ICE since its post-9/11 establishment, so now we have this runaway train with hi-tech Israeli spyware. Using this new device won't require a warrant. By size, and having no need of obtain warrants for surveillance or detentions, ICE has become more powerful than the FBI. The FBI must obtain judicial warrants for arrests, wiretaps, or searches from a federal magistrate. ICE may have to obtain a search warrant for a US citizen's private property, so to avoid that Constitutional paperwork, they will just deploy around businesses, schools, traffic intersections, Home Depots, courthouses, airports, or any public spaces. Anybody ICE detains does not have to be taken before a federal magistrate, unlike the FBI or DEA, like we saw with Nicolas Maduro. If the detainee is a US citizen, they must prove it at the ICE facility in order to be released.... 404media.co/inside-ices-tool… Filed Under.... #ICEsurveillance, #Webloc, #Penlink, #WarrantlessTracking, #PhoneSurveillance, #MassSurveillance, #PrivacyInvasion, #FourthAmendment, #CivilLiberties, #ACLU, #LocationData, #Geofencing, #NeighborhoodMonitoring, #TrackPhones, #NoWarrant, #ICEabuse, #DeportationTool, #BigBrother, #SurveillanceState, #DataBroker, #MobileTracking, #PatternOfLife, #HomeTracking, #WorkTracking, #404Media, #ImmigrationEnforcement, #DigitalPrivacy, #GovernmentOverreach, #SpyTool, #CellPhoneData, #BulkSurveillance, #PrivacyRights, #StopMassSurveillance, #ProtectPrivacy, #EndWarrantlessSpying, #ICEpower, #RunawayAgency, #ConstitutionalRights, #AmericansLast, #MAGAprivacy, #Hypocrisy, #TrumpAdministration, #DHS, #HomelandSecurity, #TechSurveillance, #IsraeliSpyware, #Cobwebs, #TanglesWebloc, #PenlinkContract
2
4
3
286
ବଦଳାଇ ଦିଅନ୍ତୁ ଏହି ସେଟିଙ୍ଗ୍, ନଚେତ ବିପଦରେ ପଡ଼ିପାରେ ପ୍ରାଇଭେସି..ୟୁଜରଙ୍କ ଡାଟା ଆକ୍ସେସ କରିପାରେ ଗୁଗୁଲ୍ | Change Your Settings Now – Protect Privacy from these Application Data Access #PrivacyAlert #dataaccess #ProtectPrivacy #CyberSecurity #DataSafety #OnlinePrivacy #DigitalSecurity #UserData #TechNews #PrivacySettings #InternetSafety #cyberexpert #cyberhackers #cyberprotection
4
79
Replying to @savingprivacy
You may want to consider registering the shorter ProtectPrivacy .now domain. You can buy .now at registrars like Namecheap, Spaceship, Dynadot and NameSilo.
2
95
A forwarded photo without permission can ruin someone’s life. Respect privacy. Don’t share. #ProtectPrivacy #DigitalConsent #16Days
3
147
This is exactly the sort of overreach that should terrify every Brit and European 😡🇬🇧 Scanning private messages, emails, and chats? That’s not safety - that’s mass surveillance, and doing it in secret makes it even worse. Privacy isn’t a luxury, it’s a fundamental right. Labour following suit would just rubber-stamp this Orwellian nightmare here. We need transparency, debate, and protections - not shadowy tech-snooping laws that treat everyone like a criminal. Digital freedom isn’t negotiable. 🚨💻 #StopChatControl #ProtectPrivacy #CommonSenseUK #DigitalRights
3
14
106
2,167
Replying to @cnnbrk
"Both rights and privacy matter. The court has, for now, not blocked data sharing between the IRS and ICE. We must keep a close watch on this. #ProtectPrivacy"
111
10 Nov 2025
34 Organizations and 41 Legislators Unite to Urge Hearing on REAL ID Repeal Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF) and a broad national coalition have sent a letter to U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), urging him to hold a Senate hearing on his bill to repeal the 2005 REAL ID Act — S. 2769, the Safeguarding Personal Information Act. The coalition warns that the federal REAL ID system is rapidly evolving into a biometric digital ID that could be used to track or limit Americans’ movements, purchases, and even access to health care. “REAL ID is not about safety—it’s about surveillance and control,” said Twila Brase, RN, PHN, president of CCHF. CCHF continues to lead the national effort to stop the federal ID and protect Americans’ right to Refuse REAL ID. 📄 Read the coalition letter: cchfreedom.org/wp-content/up… 🔗 Learn more: RefuseRealID.org #RefuseREALID #HealthFreedom #ProtectPrivacy #StopDigitalID #RandPaul #CCHF #FreedomFirst
2
5
150