Why PROGA 2025 raises serious constitutional concerns.
'Thread 1/4'
PROGA 2025 is under challenge before the Supreme Court for violating fundamental rights.
Hearing held on 21 Jan 2026; matter deferred to February.
Key constitutional issues:
• Article 19(1)(g) – Blanket ban on skill-based Real Money Games (RMG) destroys legitimate trade. Games like rummy, poker & fantasy sports are protected where skill predominates.
• Article 14 – Arbitrary classification: skill games banned, while state lotteries (pure chance) continue.
• Article 21 – Excessive paternalism; no evidence-based harm analysis or least-restrictive regulatory measures.
• Federalism – Betting & gambling fall under State List (Entry 34); a nationwide central prohibition raises legislative competence concerns.
Pending adjudication, PROGA presents serious constitutional doubts under settled law.
#PROGAUnconstitutional #RMGBan
'Thread 2/4'
Indian constitutional jurisprudence is clear and consistent:
Here are few cases in which judiciary has passed an order on skill based games.
1. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India
* AIR 1957 SC 628 *
Held: Competitions where success depends on a substantial degree of skill are not gambling and are protected under Article 19(1)(g).
→ Introduced the “predominance of skill over chance” doctrine.
2. State of A.P. v. K. Satyanarayana
* AIR 1968 SC 825 *
Held: Rummy is mainly a game of skill, involving memory, strategy & judgment.
→ Gambling laws do not apply.
This doctrine has governed the field for over 60 years.
#SkillGames #ConstitutionalLaw
3. Later SC & High Court precedents reinforce the rule
K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu
* (1996) 2 SCC 226 | AIR 1996 SC 1153 *
Held: Horse racing is a game of skill; blanket bans are unconstitutional.
4. Varun Gumber v. U.T. of Chandigarh
* 2017 SCC OnLine P&H 5372 | Cri LJ 3827 *
Held: Fantasy sports involve skill, judgment & statistical analysis.
→ Dream11 declared a game of skill; prohibition rejected.
5. Gurdeep Singh Sachar v. Union of India
* 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 13059 *
Held: Fantasy sports are not gambling; protected commercial activity.
6. All India Gaming Federation v. State of Tamil Nadu
* 2023 SCC OnLine Mad 4530 *
Held: Online rummy & poker are skill-based games.
→ Absolute ban struck down as violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) & 301.
No judgment till date overrules these principles.
#LegalPrecedents #FantasySports
'Thread 3/4'
Post-PROGA outcomes show regulatory failure:
• As per CUTS International survey data, offshore platform usage rose from 68% to 82%
• User spending increased: 26% now spend ₹5k–10k/month (earlier ~8%)
• Underground betting economy estimated at ₹8.2 lakh crore annually
• 7,800 sites blocked, yet mirror sites reappear within hours
• Influencer-driven promotion via Telegram & Instagram continues unchecked
Meanwhile, state lotteries (pure chance) remain legal.
Result: higher addiction risk, no KYC, no consumer safeguards — harm pushed underground.
#IllegalBetting #BlackMarket
'Thread 4/4'
Economic & employment fallout
Impact so far:
• ₹15,000–20,000 crore annual loss in GST & income tax
• Pre-ban RMG ecosystem contributed ₹20,000 crore in revenue
• 200,000 jobs supported earlier
• 7,000 layoffs, 400 firms shut, 2,000 startups at risk
• $840M investor write-downs
The constitutional answer is regulation, not prohibition:
KYC, spending limits, consumer protection & strict action against illegal operators.
Constitutional scrutiny must favour regulate over ban.
#RegulateNotBan #SaveRMGIndia
#PROGA
#OnlineGamingBill2025
Views expressed are legal-policy analysis. Matter pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Knee jerk blanket ban on Online Real Money Gaming without consulting stakeholders or states is another masterstroke by Modi Sarkar in bad policy making.
Here’s why:
Revenue hit: India earns ₹20,000 Cr annually from GST & income tax via online RMG. The ban means states lose this a revenue stream.
Jobs & Startups at risk: 2,000 gaming startups | 2 lakh jobs in IT, AI, design.
A ban kills India’s gaming talent pool & pushes entrepreneurs abroad.
Investments dry up: ₹23,000 Cr FDI in last 5 years. Global investors will pull back if India shuts its own digital industry.
Ecosystem collapse: ₹7,000 Cr spent annually on ads, data centres, sponsorships, cyber security will all be gone overnight.
Unintended consequences:
Bans don’t stop addiction or suicides
Instead, they push users to unregulated offshore platforms worth ₹8.2 lakh Cr annually where Government has no control at all.
Security risks: Unregulated sites ensures money laundering, terror financing, data theft. Even FATF & Rashtriya Raksha University warn against such risks.
Legal mess: The Supreme Court is still deciding whether Centre or States have the power. Why the rush to ban now?
The solution isn’t prohibition.
Probable way forward:
- Regulating skill-based platforms
- Enforcing IT Rules, 2021
- Whitelisting legitimate operators
A well balanced regulation will ensure:
- Jobs Revenue
- Safer users
- National security
- Global innovation
A blanket ban will not only lead to evenue loss, but will give rise to Illegal markets that might threaten national security and of course, there will be a huge innovation setback.
Regulation is the way forward.