Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
YorkieRocks retweeted
Replying to @MarcNixon24
Liberal logic is this odious government crowing about keeping children safe while the uber liberal SCOC struck down 1 year mandatory minimum prison sentences as unconstitutional. Huh??!!?? They're setting Canadians up for the mother of all curb stomps. 82nd Airborne...call us.
1
1
83
Paragraphs 142, 154 & 155 of SCoC reference case don't preclude the possibility of ULS. While deemed illegal in Canadian law, internat'l recognition would make that moot. After votes are tallied & the intention is clear, the fed gov't can't legally 🛑 it. Nor can tbe other provs.
9
Omni G retweeted
Replying to @NitaKang
it will never hold up in the SCoC, the only thing it will do is waste time money and bleed the government dry from lawsuits.
1
1
2
180
Replying to @RonVoss5
No matter how it's argued, you CANT escape Constitutionality. Provincial Legislation CANT, Governments CANT, Questions CANT, Referendums CANT, SCoC CANT, the HOC CANT bypass it. If you tried TODAY, ANOTHER Court will quash the attempt. --Thats WHY CIA was written that way.
1
10
Scoc 🥂
2
8
Her willingness to serve, attention to detail, and positive attitude make her an invaluable part of our committee. Today, we're proud to shine the spotlight on her and celebrate the impact she continues to make. 💜 #MeetYourExecutive #SCOC
4
After some back and forth regarding who will be included in the class, ie; those who suffered minor, common side effects as opposed to those who suffered severe adverse events. AB council to look up lunch break. Chipiuk now turns to causes of action: 1. Negligent Misrepresentation: The negligent misrepresentation claim is grounded in specific pleaded facts and satisfies the elements set out by the SCOC in Queen v Cognos Inc: 1. A duty of care based on a special relationship; 2. An untrue, inaccurate, or misleading representations; 3. Negligence in making the representations; 4. Reasonable reliance; and 5. Resulting damage.
3
4
38
1,001
Replying to @wealthmoose
It seems highly inappropriate that she is taking a stance on a political topic. That is almost as inappropriate as the Chief Justice of the SCoC taking a stance on a political topic. Or a governor of BoC doing the same.
33
Many Canadians and orgs migrated to B-Sky in their faux-principled hissy fit against Musk. Institutions like the SCOC simply stopped updating on X. Says a lot to me and not surprising.
1
10
Replying to @RKotzma @HTBF1968
Actually I’m amused by your Elbows Up. You do realize the Libs are not responsible for MAID? The SCOC forces the govt to create it. And guess who demanded equal MAID access under their Charter rights? Yes - members of the MH community. What now?
2
So now we’re seeing the SCOC as our final line of defence? Not a good look
1
52
More BS and fear mongering. Most legal analysts agree that aspects of SCOC decision on New Brunswick will apply to Cowichan. Specifically, aboriginal rights DO NOT override property rights. #bcpoli
The NDP’s handling of the Cowichan ruling is a complete and utter disaster. Their reckless UNDRIP based policies and changes to the Interpretation Act have thrown fee simple title into chaos across British Columbia. Homeowners, farmers, and businesses in the Cowichan claim area and beyond are now left in serious doubt. When Aboriginal title claims create this kind of uncertainty over private land, families lose confidence in their ownership of their own homes, and investors flee. Vital projects grind to a halt while the NDP fuels division and economic chaos, rather than providing any clarity. The NDP has zero credibility to lecture anyone about unity or the economy when their own ideological experiments are actively sabotaging the property rights British Columbians depend on. This is reckless and dangerous, and Richmond-Queensborough is getting hit especially hard. British Columbia desperately needs ironclad guarantees of fee simple title and a government that puts real certainty and results ahead of these disastrous ideological experiments.
147
Which mail order law school did you graduate from? Recent SCOC decision on New Brunswick will affect Cowichan case. This is just fear mongering. #bcpoli
The NDP’s decisions on DRIPA, their changes to the Interpretation Act, and the uncertainty from the Cowichan ruling are undermining the security of homes, farms, and businesses across our province. When fee simple title is cast into doubt, families lose confidence, investors walk away, and vital projects like pipelines to tidewater are stalled. This is the frustration our Alberta neighbours feel, and it weakens us all. I know these issues firsthand. I fought and won a landmark property rights case at the Supreme Court of Canada on the Musqueam leasehold dispute, defending ordinary homeowners against overreach. Secure property rights are essential to freedom, family stability, and a thriving economy. The NDP cannot credibly lecture Alberta about unity while his policies create the very roadblocks fuelling Western concerns. British Columbians expect better. While the NDP pushes policies that sow division, our Conservative vision will strengthen the West and deliver a far more prosperous British Columbia for every family. This is about good-paying jobs, safer communities, and a province where families can afford to stay and build their futures. Having served in Stephen Harper’s cabinet, where we lowered taxes and returned to surplus, I know how to deliver these results. The NDP’s ideological experiments have gone on long enough. I invite every British Columbian who believes in freedom and prosperity to join the BC Conservative movement today. Become a member and help us build the team that will rescue our province. Join me. Together we will defeat the NDP
125
LOL...they know it's a disaster but they can't walk out of it. PMMC could have made canning the program one of his first acts in office, and gotten a lot of credit for seeing reality. Now they face having _another_ dictatorial OIC trashed by the SCOC.
1
32
Harper’s Bill C-7 (the Senate Reform Act, introduced in 2011), the term limit Bill (S-4 & successors like Bill C-19). In 2014, SCoC ruled that Senate reform required constitutional amendments.
1
15
Do you not remember the SCoC weighing in on things he was trying to accomplish?
1
12
Replying to @cselley
How could he not know? As public servants, the SCoC are subject to the Judges Act and Canadian Judaical Council. Somebody has to know where the anonymous donation came from. There's a paper trail. Somebody paid for its installation too.
1
2
109
Replying to @Polysesouvient
Fuck you! Innocent hunters and sport shooters aren’t the problem and you know it. Even with your made up military-style BS. I hope the SCoC finds for is and puts you in your place. There are millions of gun owners Polysesouvient doesnt speak for Canadians
8