How is she even comfortable to accept the tag of a "policy expert"?? Hater huna khojya haina Ki but masters gardaima you don't become a POLICY EXPERT 😭 Ajja bideshko 2 barsha course padhera Nepalko policyma bahas garne expert rey? Na experience Na academics Na representative ho

No lies detected…

Day 1 of RaSwaPa in government. Their 'bachapatra' commits to: → Formal state apology to Dalit community → Legal & policy reforms against caste discrimination → End to structural exclusion We are watching!!

यी हुन् पोखरा विमानस्थल भ्रष्टाचार मुद्दाका ५६ प्रतिवादीहरू ० सम्बन्धित समाचार पढ्न यस लिंक ➡️ nayapatrikadaily.com/news-de… ⬅️ क्लिक गर्नुहोस् #pokharaairport #nayapatrika

Classic clueless take. “Murti Chor & Co”? When logic fails, just parrot the same old communist propaganda. You people act like mocking the monarchy is a political ideology. It’s not - it’s your intellectual bankruptcy🥱. The problem with people like you is simple you don’t want discourse; you want dominance. You cry ‘democracy’ but can’t stand diverse thought. Bro, the only real chor & co in Nepal are the ones who’ve looted the country for 35 years straight Congress, UML, and Maoists- while people like you still bark at the King who hasn’t held office since your childhood. The man you call “Murti Chor” literally pays more tax than half your “leaders” combined and runs actual businesses, not party cartels. The monarchy didn’t steal your future your “republican communist daddies” did. Pukar Bam’s so-called “new politics” ended up splitting the votes of honest and frustrated citizens, which helped the same corrupt old forces stay in power. So, spare the “Murti Chor” lectures. If your idea of progress is helping the very criminals you pretend to fight, then congratulations you’re not part of the solution; you’re just a useful distraction. This country doesn’t need another round of blind hero worship or hate politics it needs balance. And that balance can only come from acknowledging all voices, not just the ones echoing your ideology. Keep pushing singular politics, and you’ll be the very reason Nepal stays unstable, divided, and leaderless🙏

You confuse permission with freedom. You think criticizing your government makes you free, when it only proves your obedience has been domesticated. The empire learned long ago that censorship creates martyrs, but managed dissent creates citizens who mistake supervision for liberty. You can insult your leaders all you want, as long as you never question the system that produces them. That’s why the same wars, the same banks, and the same interests outlive every election. You call that democracy. I call it continuity. You say authoritarianism means "too much power in one hand." But tell me, who has more power than a system that can bomb seven countries in a decade without consulting its people? In your mind, "freedom" is the right to complain while nothing changes. In mine, it’s the right to change what you’re not allowed to complain about. You say no country is perfect. That’s true. But only one insists on punishing everyone else for "imperfection." You want to know the difference between your "democracy" and our so-called "authoritarianism"? We don’t pretend. You do. Your freedom ends where your empire begins. You say the only American colony was Liberia. Tell that to Puerto Rico. Tell it to Guam. To Hawaii. To the Philippines. To every Latin American state whose elections were rewritten by your ambassadors. Colonies don’t always fly foreign flags anymore. Some just carry foreign debt. Everywhere the dollar dictates policy, a colony exists. Everywhere the IMF writes the budget, a colony exists. Everywhere your vote ends at someone else’s veto, a colony exists. So don’t mistake tolerance for democracy, or noise for freedom. Empires don’t silence everyone. They teach them what’s safe to say.

【教育委員会の齋藤さんと筆談】 2025年9月26日 FAXの返事、まだですか？ こちらは1か月以上前に送付。 「夕方FAXで送りました」と伝えたところ── 教育委員会側の回答は以下の通り 🔸「お返事をお求めたのでしょうか？」 → いえ、明確に“返答を求める内容”です。FAX文中にもそう書いてあります。 　※この認識の差こそが、“かみ合わない会話”の象徴です。 🔸「ご意見をちょうだいしていたものと考えておりました」 → “意見”ではありません。“質問・事実確認・見解の提示”を求めた正式文書です。 　一方的に「意見」と受け取られては、やり取りが成立しません。 🔸「いじめの件については教育総務課から申立書を送り、そちらに則って進めます」 → これは“すり替え”です。FAXは申立書とは別の視点での問いかけです。 　そもそも、申立書に基づく処理だけで「全体の対応」が済むとは思っていません。 🔸「重大事態として扱う中で方針を示せるものですので、返事は変わりません」 → “今後の方針”の話と、“過去の対応への説明”は別です。 　なぜなら、すでに起きた「非対応・不備・認識の誤差」に対して、私は説明を求めています。未来の話で片付けないでください。 🔸「私個人が返事する内容ではありません」 → FAX文の宛名は組織宛です。しかし、面談時にこの方が窓口対応していたのは事実です。 　ならば組織としての正式回答を用意するか、然るべき部署に引き継ぐべきではないでしょうか。 📍これが、1か月返答がなかった理由の全容です（2025年9月26日 13:04記録）。 これをどう受け取るかは、それぞれの立場で異なると思います。 📝【備忘録として】 この投稿は非難や糾弾を目的としたものではありません。 今後の検証や、同じ立場の方々との共有を目的とした「記録・備忘録」として残します。 #障害者差別解消法 #合理的配慮 #教育委員会対応 #鎌倉市

पैसा खेरा गयो, किनकी राजदूत पद गयो। पावर खेरा गयो, किनकी देशमा Gen-Z आयो।।

いじめ自殺事件の和解金、10万。 加害者が加害行為を認めていても和解金として支払われるのは、10万。 弁護士さんに3桁万支払って、賠償は10万。 これがいじめ裁判の現実。 お金のためだけなら損するんだから裁判なんかしない。裁判するのは、「被害者の尊厳を取り戻すため」しかない。

🇯🇵 This is Japan. In Japan, some schools (even elementary, junior high, and high school) believe violence leads to victory in sports. Teachers say, “It was not abuse, it was coaching.” No punishment. No name disclosed. They quietly return to school. Some teachers even say: “It’s not surveillance, it’s watching over.” Teachers mark students who are siblings of bullying victims. The Third-Party Committee, Board of Education – they punish, then forget. That’s why bullying never ends in Japan. ⸻ #JapanEducationCrisis #BullyingInJapan #JapaneseSchoolSystem #HumanRightsViolations #ChildrenDeserveBetter #StopSchoolViolence #AccountabilityInEducation #SilencedVictims #AbuseInTheNameOfCoaching #StructuralDiscrimination #NameAndShame #TransparencyNow #EducationalInjustice #JapanUnderTheMask #VoicesOfTheVoiceless #NoMoreSilentSuffering #StandWithVictims #GlobalHumanRights #ProtectChildrenEverywhere #EndBullyingNow

Totally disagree!!? एउटै Solution !! यो हत्यामा संलग्न प्रधानमन्त्री, गृहमन्त्रीलाई प्रकाउ गर्ने । कारबाहि गर्ने । आर्मिले सत्ता लिने "वालेन शाह" जस्तै जनताले मन पराएको मान्छेलाई नेतृत्व दिने । जनताबाट प्रत्यक्ष निर्वाचित कार्यकारी प्रमुख सहित निर्वाचनमा जाने । No if but नोट: रोटि सक्ने काम नगरौ । 🛑

Nepal has certainly seen impressive political changes within such a short time frame, but the old political elite continue to have stronghold in façade of new political-economic structures and configurations, under 'rent-driven capitalism'- what might it take to dent this?