It’s up to me to follow what I believe is right; there was no transgression whatsoever, and you know that. Of course, if the person feels uncomfortable, I also think it's best to stop, but in this context, that's not what's happening.

Living in an era where every transgression is documented means that the chances that history will be edited are fickle but the chances that Justice will arrive become high.

"SCARE EVENT NECESSARY" ONLY THEN WILL THE PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE. Isaiah 10:20-22 tells US (We The People) SCARE 😱 EVENT NECESSARY. ONLY THEN WILL WE THE PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE. That the REMNANT that have ESCAPED from the HOUSE of Jacob. (DARK TO LIGHT, TURNED FROM THE TRANSGRESSION OF JACOB, THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, JESUS THE DISGUISED SAVIOR, HATERS OF THE LAW, REPENT FROM WORSHIPPING IDOLS ✝️) will NEVER again ALLOW them who have DEFEATED them,(POLITICIANS, DEEP STATE, CABAL, ILLUMINATI, RELIGION, HOLLYWOOD, etc) to have POWER ✊️ over them (EVER AGAIN), But will DEPEND ON the Lord, (@POTUS, @realDonaldTrump, Donald J. Trump) the Holy One of Israel, in TRUTH. Although OUR People (We The People) Are the sands of the sea, only a REMNANT will RETURN (TO YHWH, God and be HEALED) Isaiah has been unsealed. There is REST and TRUTH in the Book 📖 of Isaiah. Isaiah 10:20-22 20 And it shall come to pass (IN THAT DAY) That the REMNANT of Israel, And such as have ESCAPED of the house of Jacob, (Will NEVER again DEPEND) on him who DEFEATED them, But will (DEPEND on the Lord), the (Holy One of Israel, in TRUTH). 21 The (REMNANT will RETURN), the REMNANT of Jacob, To the Mighty God. 22 For though your people, O Israel, be as the sand of the sea, A REMNANT of them will RETURN; THIS IS ALL BIBLICAL 🌎 NCSWIC 🍿🍿🍿

Fight Club didn’t give men permission to stay boys forever. It showed what happens when they do. The version of the movie that lives in the culture treats Tyler Durden like some liberating force ... the guy who finally tells the narrator to stop being a corporate drone and start living. That reading is lazy and it’s wrong. Tyler isn’t liberation. He’s what rushes in to fill the hole when a man never had a father who stayed, never had anyone demand he grow up, and never learned how to carry real weight. The film puts it right in front of you. Both main characters come from fathers who walked out and kept starting new families like they were opening new locations. That absence doesn’t create dangerous men by accident. It creates men who are starving for any strong male presence, even a destructive one. Tyler doesn’t fix that hunger. He exploits it. He gives the narrator the thrill of transgression without ever requiring him to become someone worth respecting in daylight. The real story isn’t the fight club. It’s what the narrator eventually has to reject. The chaos stops being attractive the moment he stops running from the one thing that actually demands something from him: a real woman who sees him clearly and won’t play along with the fantasy. Maturity in this movie doesn’t look like more explosions or better one-liners. It looks like finally being willing to be honest instead of spectacular. Most of the internet turned Fight Club into an anthem for permanent rebellion. The actual film ends by choosing the opposite. That’s not an accident. It’s the part nobody wanted to hear. (article below)

For if the word spoken by angels was stedfast, & every transgression & disobedience received a just recompence of reward; How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, & was confirmed unto us by them that heard him: … ?

But they don't care. The right of transgression is everything to these fucking Satanics.

A fair assessment. Although there are many things to be mildly upset at, an unavoidable fact of life as is stated as Dukkha. Rage from a transgression from someone who understands this is deep and spiritual, more than merely being upset.

Daniel 8:11 He even exalted himself as high as the Prince of the host; Because of transgression an army was given he cast truth down to the ground. He did all this and prospered. For two thousand three hundred days; then the sanctuary shall be cleansed.” youtu.be/rW1jYtJt-QA

Every creature in the Garden was immortal until the fall. It was Eve's desire for knowledge that broke the spell. Were it not for her transgression there would be no world for which the morning stars shouted for joy. It is Eve who fulfilled God's plan and got things going.

Measured response for such a grievous transgression.

Green approves of Kabbalah (Jewish mysticism/Jewish Gnosticism) but rejects Christianity. Let's examine his lineage: Occultists’ Views on the Godthe ofBible, Worship, Magical Systems, and Controversies Isaac Luria (1534–1572) Tradition: Lurianic Kabbalah (founder) View of Yahweh/Christ: Yahweh is part of the divine emanation process within Ein Sof; no strong Demiurge critique. Christ not central. View of the Bible: Torah as cosmic myth requiring Lurianic exegesis; exoteric level is lower understanding. Who they worshipped: Ein Sof (Infinite Godhead); focus on divine sparks and cosmic repair. Magical System/Practice: Lurianic Kabbalah (tzimtzum, shevirah, tikkun, Partzufim). Controversies: No major personal scandals or accusations of immorality, fraud, crime, or abuse. Died young (age 38) in an epidemic. Some later critics noted his teachings indirectly fueled messianic movements (e.g., Sabbateanism), but Luria himself maintained a highly ascetic and respected rabbinic life. Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) Tradition: Sabbatean Messianism (founder) View of Yahweh/Christ: Torah God often seen as Demiurge or “God of Death” to be transcended. Claimed to be the Messiah. View of the Bible: Torah must be inverted or transcended through antinomianism. Who they worshipped: Hidden “Good God” beyond the revealed lawgiver; himself as Messiah. Magical System/Practice: Antinomian Kabbalah with messianic transgression and inversion of law. Controversies: Proclaimed himself Messiah, leading to massive delusion of Jews worldwide; deliberately violated Jewish laws (eating forbidden fats, etc.); converted to Islam under threat of death (causing huge scandal); encouraged followers toward antinomian practices including sexual immorality and orgies in some branches; widely regarded as a false messiah and one of the greatest disasters in Jewish history. Jacob Frank (1726–1791) Tradition: Sabbatean-Frankism (founder) View of Yahweh/Christ: Yahweh as evil/repressive “God of Death”; Jesus compromised with the Demiurge. View of the Bible: Torah and religious law must be deliberately inverted and broken for redemption. Who they worshipped: Hidden “Good God” above the demiurges; himself as messianic figure. Magical System/Practice: Radical antinomian Kabbalah involving holy sin, transgression, and strategic religious inversion. Controversies: Extreme sexual depravity — followers accused of ritual orgies, incest (including father-daughter), adultery, and sacred prostitution; 1756 Lanckoroń scandal involving dancing around a naked woman symbolizing the Shechinah; caused mass excommunications and conversions to Christianity for protection; led a cult-like movement involving deliberate moral inversion and “purification through sin”; widely condemned as heretical and immoral. Eliphas Levi (1810–1875) Tradition: Ceremonial Magician / Occultist View of Yahweh/Christ: Jehovah as lower tribal deity (one of the Elohim). Christ as symbol of equilibrium and the Great Magus. View of the Bible: Book of allegories and symbols; exoteric for masses, esoteric for initiates. Who they worshipped: Universal Absolute / equilibrium. Magical System/Practice: Ceremonial Kabbalistic magic (Tree of Life, Tarot, correspondences). Controversies: Brief and failed Freemasonry membership; multiple imprisonments for political/religious writings (e.g., socialist-leaning La Bible de la Liberté); left seminary amid scandals involving romantic attachments; criticized as overly speculative or fraudulent by some contemporaries; financial instability and accusations of charlatanism in occult circles. Helena Blavatsky (1831–1891) Tradition: Theosophy (founder) View of Yahweh/Christ: Yahweh as tribal inferior deity (“third-rate potency”). Jesus as myth; true Christians were Gnostics. View of the Bible: Not the “Word of God”; contains allegories and distortions of older wisdom. Who they worshipped: Impersonal Parabrahman / Rootless Root. Magical System/Practice: Syncretic Theosophical esotericism (Kabbalah Hindu Buddhist Gnostic). Controversies: Coulomb Affair (1884–85) — accused of fraud by former employees who claimed she faked Mahatma letters and phenomena using hidden panels and tricks; Hodgson Report (Society for Psychical Research) declared her “one of the most accomplished, ingenious, and interesting impostors in history”; multiple accusations of plagiarism, fabricated travels, and exaggerated claims; personal life scandals including bigamy rumors and unconventional relationships; widely labeled a charlatan by critics. René Guénon (1886–1951) Tradition: Traditionalism / Perennialism View of Yahweh/Christ: Exoteric Yahweh as limited Semitic expression. Christ valid in his tradition but not exclusive savior. View of the Bible: Exoteric form containing initiatic symbols, but degenerated in modernity. Who they worshipped: Pure transcendent Supreme Principle. Magical System/Practice: Intellectual initiation and metaphysical symbolism (with selective use of Kabbalah, Sufism, Hinduism). Controversies: Few personal scandals; criticized for elitism, anti-modern extremism, and rigid traditionalism; some accused him of intellectual arrogance and cult-like influence on followers; no major crimes, fraud, or sexual immorality documented. Aleister Crowley (1875–1947) Tradition: Thelema (founder) View of Yahweh/Christ: Yahweh as “vile mask of matter” / Demiurge and slave-god. Christ part of the dying Old Aeon. View of the Bible: “One would go mad if one took the Bible seriously” — Old Aeon slave religion. Who they worshipped: Hadit/Nuit/Ra-Hoor-Khuit; True Will. Magical System/Practice: Thelemic ceremonial magic (Kabbalah Egyptian Tantric Enochian). Controversies: Extreme sexual depravity (including group sex, sadomasochism, bestiality rumors, and “Scarlet Women” exploitation); heavy drug addiction (heroin, cocaine, etc.); Abbey of Thelema in Sicily involved alleged child neglect, animal sacrifice, and orgies leading to eviction; financial exploitation of followers; bisexual promiscuity and multiple gonorrhea/syphilis infections; self-proclaimed “Great Beast 666”; widely denounced as immoral and dangerous. Julius Evola (1898–1974) Tradition: Esoteric Traditionalism / UR Group View of Yahweh/Christ: Biblical God as lunar Demiurge; Christ as “god of the slaves.” View of the Bible: Exoteric Christianity as telluric/Semitic degeneration of Tradition. Who they worshipped: Transcendent Absolute realized through sovereign “I”. Magical System/Practice: Operative Hermeticism, Tantra, and selective Kabbalah within solar-virile path. Controversies: Influenced neo-fascist and far-right movements; racial-spiritual hierarchy theories with antisemitic elements (whilst adopting Kabbalah); accused of inspiring violent extremism post-WWII. Gerald Gardner (1884–1964) Tradition: Wicca (founder) View of Yahweh/Christ: Rejected Christian God as patriarchal and life-denying. View of the Bible: Seen as source of repressive, anti-nature religion. Who they worshipped: Horned God and Great Goddess. Magical System/Practice: Pagan witchcraft / Wicca (nature-based, ritual magic with some Kabbalistic influences). Controversies: Accusations of fabricating or heavily borrowing Wiccan rituals from earlier sources (e.g., Crowley, Leland); personal nudism and sado-masochistic interests; claims of inventing much of modern Wicca. x.com/BedeBecketBacon/status…

brad… et tu, brute???? a philly guy?? cooper, this is shameful. you did silverlinings but then did THIS????? and you did joe rogan but then did THIS??? i mean, to be fair, your bleph is easily the biggest transgression.

brad… et tu, brute???? a philly guy?? cooper, this is shameful. you did silverlinings but then did THIS????? and you did joe rogan but then did THIS??? i mean, to be fair, your bleph is easily the biggest transgression.

I agree that male and female dress codes are not universal. With whats discussed in mind, I wouldnt see wearing one as a transgression. And I would imagine that women's variants have alterations over the years rather than simply adopting the men's as is.

there's no limit to transgression-to lose a sense of shame

Qu’il est navrant. Je crois qu’il a toujours été un fan envieux de son ex beau-père sans jamais en saisir l’essentiel: la transgression chez Choron n’était pas un costume, c’était la peau. Alors il surenchérit laborieusement dans le n’importe quoi en s’imaginant du même tonneau.