Yo Brainrot Nomads 🫶🌇 Roadtrip Arc – #331: Postcard #3 – Upper Town Night Vibes 🌙✨ The final impressions of our magical evening walk: 📮 Top-left: The highest viewpoint at night — the entire city spread out below us like a sea of lights, with the Milky Way just visible above. A truly breathtaking perspective of Zagreb after dark. 📮 Top-right: Warmly lit historic facades — many of these beautiful old buildings have ivy climbing the walls and soft light coming from the windows, giving the streets a cosy, lived-in feeling. 📮 Bottom-left: The illuminated funicular station and stairs — the little yellow funicular that connects Lower and Upper Town looks even cuter at night, with its warm lights guiding the way up the hill. 📮 Bottom-right: A small hidden square with string lights — locals and visitors enjoying the cool evening air under twinkling lights. These quiet corners are where you really feel the soul of the city. We’re slowly making our way back to the hotel now, but this night walk has been one of the most special parts of our time in Zagreb so far. Thank you for joining us on another full day! What should we do tomorrow? 👇 #RoadtripArc #ZagrebByNight #UpperTownZagreb #NightVibes #StrossmayerPromenade #BrainrotNomads

What's your viewpoint? The Climate Cult davidicke.com/2026/06/14/the…

This is a very stupid viewpoint. People obsessing over brexit have lost leave of their critical faculties. They leave no room for nuance, only the kind of certainty about conspiracies and gullibility of others you find within cults. See how this works?

I can't tell whether this is a serious question or bait, but here's the answer, you don't have to be a genius. You can have multiple reference frames in physics. RF1: As you can see - the car is moving at a constant velocity in a straight line (Newton's 1st law applies), - the air inside the car is moving at the same velocity as the car, - and the drone is also moving at that same velocity. From the drone's point of view, it only needs to hover relative to the air inside the car, not relative to the road. This is why it looks stationary from the viewpoint of the camera. RF2: If you are an observer fixed to a point on the Earth’s surface, both the car and the drone are moving relative to you. There are many other reference frames. The Earth rotates on its axis while orbiting the Sun. Our Solar System orbits the center of the Milky Way. The Milky Way flows within its supercluster, and the universe itself is expanding.

Dear creighton staff, I am being harassed I think my network settings are bei g changed without my consent after potential hero Brad Wirth a DoD contractor syncned my devices or else my harasser employed as police or poblic school and my identity compromised by plagiarism or under auspice of advocacy as disingenuous gratuity without consent (there is a Latin term for this that escapes me ) and my telecommunications is changing without my consent as a result either way it’s impacting ability for me to reach real people. For example, I could make comments on your livestream YouTube channel prior but now am unable despite others ability to do so thus this system admin restriction and server seri if is without my telecommunications providers’ permission and I am seeking a federal lawsuit for their abuse of @FCC compliance unless my theory is wrong but I have many more example collected of two years of what I believe is targeted harassment and stalking through my server and network management with multiple service providers. I’ve tried to report it but it’s endangered my life and compromised safety as risk management margin whether it’s harassment or not my concerns are valid in prevention of MMIP crisis this unique liability concern has enabled me to see the impact of cybersecurity from a critical viewpoint as invaluable information so it behooves a detective to assist me as pragmatic consent in hypothetical rather than scrutinizing me personally as psychosis or ptsd because my forte of risk management and suspension of disbelief as a creative discipline to whole truth is objective, my ability to calmly analyse systems’ weak points is maturity and comprehension for which my evidence is reasonable foresight if not logical imperative. @FCC @FBI @CIA @OmahaPolice @DGSociety

this is probably a controversial viewpoint, but if i can’t afford to play a game, have the right equipment, or refuse to pirate it, then i simply will not interact with said game, period. i’m not going to FUCKING watch someone play a game.

So yes, it doesnt make sense to waste precious time to do funny haha salute when you could die. It seems people forget halo was a military shooter at its core and took a lot of notes and inspiration from that viewpoint instead of ignoring basic concepts of troop deployment

it's why when you take the perspective of ONE org as a defending org vs someone who works in a MSSP across many orgs... the views will be different. You also have very different views depending on what you might 'care' about. Positions and perspective matters and it changes the view depending upon the viewpoint.

@HumzaYousaf what's your thoughts now you scumbag? I remember the TV interview you did calling this all lies, blaming the little girl. Saying it was a Bulgarian couple who were approached by the youths with weapons. You absolute cunt. Anything to defend the left viewpoint. Prick

Either way, most of the people complaining about his viewpoint are just acting out of forced outrage because they’d rather see Newsom or Rubio in the White House, and have never ending military conflicts and foreign aid.

It’s not binary in U.S. Lots if Americans are centrist moderates. My viewpoint on U.S. bases is held by people in both parties. You don’t want us there, I don’t want to pay for the protection shield in my taxes. Seems reasonable. Not MAGA but keep believing

Politicians and msm are a beard hair away from outright declaring a nationally mandated single ideological viewpoint on everything from abortion to lgbta to mass migration. What's remarkable is that they deny being a uniparty of globo commies for the wef/UN. 🤷🇮🇪🌎

It’s definitely a minority viewpoint in this neighborhood but far from unknown. Especially among the “Old Brooklynites” who have lived here forever

perhaps read some of my responses. Firstly Across the UK, roughly 6,700 hospitality businesses (including pubs, restaurants, and hotels) have formally gone bust over the last two years. This equates to over 3,300 insolvencies in both 2024 and 2025, with hundreds more collapsing in the first quarter of 2026 alone. How much do you think is lost in jobs and tax revenue from this? Secondly the hospitality sector contributes around £9 billion annually in business rates. This disproportionately burdens the industry: while hospitality represents just 2.5% of overall business economic activity, it accounts for roughly 11% of all business rates paid. You have already lost a % of this. If you lose a further 20% of hospitality businesses (which is a real possibility) you lose not only the business rates, but the jobs/income tax/Ni and of course VAT income. As I have pointed out to you and those supporting your viewpoint, it is way more convoluted than what you are suggesting... it always is.

Aside from the universe that was alway here, A god would not need fine-tuning, Mathematical laws are descriptive, but the “creator” of all life to ever exist including all humans to ever exist yet doesn't understand pi? Digital genetic code shows human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs), remnants of past retroviral infections integrated into the human genome, can offer insights into human evolution. By analyzing the distribution and characteristics of HERVs across different primate species, scientists can trace the origin and evolution of these retroviruses and, in turn, infer the evolutionary history of humans and their primate relatives. Roughly 8% of the human genome is made up of Human Endogenous Retroviruses (HERVs). These are genetic remnants of ancient viral infections our primate ancestors experienced millions of years ago. And the fact that even theists steal our moral framework, sure, you’re correct. 1750 BC A comprehensive Babylonian legal text that predates biblical laws by centuries, the Code of Hammurabi ( BCE) shares significant legal, structural, and thematic parallels with the Covenant Code in Exodus 20-23, suggesting Mesopotamian influence on biblical law. Many scholars argue that the Torah adopted and adapted existing Ancient Near Eastern legal traditions—using similar "if-then" (casuistic) structures—rather than creating them from scratch. Without Yahweh Potlatches (Its origins predate written history) were created and characterized by a ceremony in which possessions are given away, or destroyed, to display wealth, generosity and enhance prestige. This gift-giving ceremony that served multiple purposes, including: Wealth redistribution High-ranking individuals would accumulate valuable goods over time and then redistribute them. The term 'Potlatch' has been taken from a Nootka Indian word meaning "gift". The Nootka, are one of the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast of Canada. 1. The advent of big bang cosmology in this century was a watershed for theists. Why? 2. Theists regarded science as hostile but big bang cosmology in effect reversed this situation. The central idea of this cosmology, that the universe exploded into existence in a 'big bang' about 15 billion years ago or so, seemed tailor made to a theistic viewpoint. Big bang cosmology seemed to offer empirical evidence for the religious doctrine of creation ex nihilo. A being that is all knowing, powerful enough to create the universe from nothing by speaking them into existence with a magic spell, creatio ex nihilo. There is no empirical evidence for the religious doctrine of creation ex nihilo!!! There is no empirical evidence there was ever nothing!!! There is no empirical evidence that the universe exploded into existence!!! In science the law of conservation of mass-energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another proving the universe has always existed in different forms or presentations. The universe has always existed!!! 3. The response of atheists and agnostics to this development has been comparatively weak, indeed, almost invisible. The reason for the apparent embarrassment of nontheists is not hard to find. Anthony Kenny suggests it in this summary statement: According to the big bang theory, the whole matter of the universe began to exist at a particular time in the remote past. But the Big Bang marked the beginning of the universe's rapid expansion and cooling, leading to the formation of fundamental particles, atoms, and eventually, stars and galaxies. In the early universe, before the formation of atoms and molecules, the universe was filled with a hot soup of fundamental particles, including quarks, leptons, and photons. But you say Yahweh who is at least knowledgeable enough to run infinite creation test models whose purpose is to fill heaven with souls but it picks a creation model that requires Non-Player Characters (NPC) lacking independent thought with no free will to build large, flourishing cities with houses filled with all sorts of goods, to dig wells, and plant vineyards and olive groves only for its chosen people to seize and kills his son? This the Lord your God the “creator” of everything creates Non-Player Characters (NPC) the Hittites, the Gegosites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, Egyptians and the Jebusites lacking independent thought with no free will that have no choice but burn in hell for ever after being raped, robbed and killed? The “creator” of all laws which would include the laws of physics. The “creator” of all life to ever exist including all humans to ever exist yet doesn't understand pi. God’s Rape Laws The Bible contains three different regulations regarding the treatment of a woman who has been raped, which are heavily dependent on her marital status and the location. As the laws are only about the loss of virginity because it was viewed as a commodity "non-virgin women" being raped is not addressed. Deuteronomy 22:23–29. 23 A virgin pledged to be married rapped in a town, 24. Stone both to death. 25. A young woman pledged to be married rapped in the country, Only the man shall die. 26 Do nothing to the woman. 28. A virgin who is not pledged to be married 29 He shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, He can never divorce her as long as he lives. God’s Power Rape Law Outside Sodom and Gomorrah power rape for David secretly murdering Uriah the Hittite, Bathsheba’s husband and committing adultery with Bathsheba secret from everybody but the all knowing "omniscient" Yahweh, Yahweh would cause David ‘s wives to be taken and slept with by another in public view. When David's son, Absalom, publicly slept with ten of David's concubines in a tent pitched on the roof Yahweh fulfilled his word. The event is generally interpreted as a "power rape" or a severe act of political and personal humiliation. Absalom committed a notorious act of treason by having sexual relations with his father's (King David's) concubines. This was done as a political power move, intentionally signaling a complete usurpation of the throne. 2 Samuel 12:11-12: The prophet Nathan declared that because David acted in secret, God would cause his wives to be taken and slept with by another in public view. 2 Samuel 16:21-22: This prophecy was fulfilled when David's son, Absalom, rebelled and, upon the advice of Ahithophel, publicly slept with ten of David's concubines in a tent pitched on the roof. 2 Samuel 20:3: Following these events, David separated these ten concubines, placing them in a house under guard and providing for them, but he never slept with them again. They remained in a state of "living widowhood" for the rest of their lives, as they were considered defiled under Mosaic Law. Is there ever a scenario where women should be punished for the crimes of their husband? Is there ever a scenario where the first child born to David and Bathsheba would have to die shortly after birth as part of the immediate judgment? The first child born to David and Bathsheba died shortly after birth with no free will as part of the immediate judgment. Man’s Rape Laws Rape laws vary significantly across U.S. states, However, states generally categorize these offenses into two main areas: forcible rape and statutory rape. 1. Forcible Rape (Sexual Assault) Most U.S. states use gender-neutral definitions and have adopted the updated FBI definition of rape. "Consent: A central component in all states is the requirement of affirmative, freely given consent. A person cannot legally consent if they are incapacitated (by alcohol or drugs), unconscious, asleep, mentally disabled, or threatened with force or coercion. Degrees of Rape: Most states break the crime down into "degrees" or use separate terms like "sexual assault" or "criminal sexual conduct." The degree of the crime (and the severity of the penalty) often depends on factors like the use of a weapon, whether serious bodily injury occurred, or the relationship between the victim and perpetrator. 2. Statutory RapeStatutory rape laws apply when one of the individuals involved is legally a minor and unable to legally consent, regardless of whether force was used. Age of Consent: The legal age of consent differs by jurisdiction, typically ranging from 16 to 18 years old. Romeo and Juliet Laws: Most states have exceptions (often called Romeo and Juliet laws) that prevent prosecution if the age difference between the minor and the offender is small, typically two to four years, and the relationship is consensual. 3. Related Legal Protections Because state penal codes differ, many states also have specific laws addressing collateral issues surrounding sexual offenses: Parental Rights: Many states have varying laws regarding whether a perpetrator retains parental rights (custody/visitation) over a child conceived through rape. Over 30 states have laws allowing the involuntary termination of a rapist's parental rights.Statutes of Limitations: The time limit for prosecuting a sex crime varies widely by state. While many states have eliminated the statute of limitations for certain sexual offenses (especially those involving minors or DNA evidence), others still maintain time frames ranging from a few years to several decades.

So the person who took a cruise wasn’t prepared enough for your liking but we’re supposed to take care of people who aren’t prepared enough to feed themselves or their kids? I was supposed to roll over and die after Obama ruined my healthcare? Absolutely ridiculous viewpoint.

トリ、vIEWpOINt 。 このバンドに類似するバンドを知らない、思いつかない。 動画では伝わらないあまりの異様さに初見の時は言葉を失った。 変則的なドラムのリズムとドロドロと 掻き鳴らされるベースの中、 ギターボーカルが狂気に満ちた表情と動きでツインネックの多弦ギターを掻き鳴らし歌い上げる

#xauusd Gold (XAUUSD) Trading Strategy for Next Week Core Viewpoint: Current Closing Price: 4218 Key Level: 4200 High Probability of Bullishness: As long as 4200 holds, a continued rebound is highly likely next week. Trading Recommendation: Long Positions: Hold above 4200, with a target of 4230-4300 and a stop-loss below 4190. Next week's trading will revolve around 4200. Holding above this level suggests a bullish move towards 4300, while a break below suggests a bearish move towards 4100.#gold

So if we are going on the premise that God is omniscient and created all things with purposeful will, then why would he have negative feelings toward those who do not believe in him when he knew all along that's how they would feel? And assuming he has the power to show them proof, since by default God can do anything or he isn't God, why would he hold it against them if they didn't get proof because he didn't send them any? That's a lesser being than God that would care about stuff humans care about because of their limited perspective and ability. And, on top of all that, I seriously doubt atheists are worrying about how they are going to explain not believing in a god they don't believe in when that god turns up for real and puts them on the hot seat. If he doesn't exist then what does it matter what they think about him? (saying that from a atheist's possible viewpoint, which I admit I do not have but I do respect it because it is legitimate brain use and logic)

And with this extreme viewpoint you provoke yon women who already dislike dudes to be even more against them. Ya know how to fix stuff? By treating humans as humans no matter what genitals they have.