idc abt sex if she doesn’t understand dialectical materialism

AI Credit-Scoring Society Is Not the End of Freedom The Basic Structure of the Problem Toward a Dialectical Direction Audit Theory of Freedom-Generation zenodo.org/records/20712726

In a sense, you are almost starting to rediscover dialectical materialism from first principles. You are more of a Marxist Leninist than Khrushchev was.

Suslov -> Andropov -> ? Hint: Gorbachev. The last protégé. The legacy of Stalin draw out through time, the dialectical moment at which a real CR would have unfolded, and the old guard died before it could be carried out. Andropov personally recalled Yakovlev from exile in Canada.

Communists: Value of linen, dialectical materialism, mudpies, blah blah blah Anti-communists: Marx and Lenin kissing 😳😳😲👇

MLs saying “dialectical materialism”

my therapist agrees w me that in DBT (dialectical behavioral theory) radical acceptance is toxic if we don’t try to change the systems in place that harm victims/survivors/neurodivergents. we can accept things all we want but if we dont change systems that cause harm, it’s futile

You are holding yourself above the majority of working class Americans who love their country, and taking the bourgeois view that such a thing means some sort of superiority. It comes from a sort of dualistic perspective, and not a dialectical one. While I, instead, agree with Mao and the Marxist/dialectical materialist view, who said, "Can a Communist who is an internationalist at the same time be a patriot? We hold not only that he can, but that he must." He then goes on to explain that the form patriotism takes changes based on context. One needs to understand the dialectics of universal and particular, which he explains in brief elsewhere, but I think Ilyenkov gets the most thorough on. My advice? Humble yourself. You are not smarter than anyone. You are not here to educate us poor workers in need of your enlightenment. The working class is the revolutionary subject, not intellectuals. Why do you think Mao sent students to the countryside, to learn from the people? There is wisdom there. One more piece of advice? The people you're involved with aren't going to help you. You'll turn your wheels forever until you get burned out or realize how much they lie, and then you'll drop out. Like everyone else who's ever been involved with them. Learn for yourself. Actually really make a study of Marx, Engels, and Lenin. Put things to the test. Don't just believe. Hold it all to scrutiny. But above all, before anything, learn the dialectical materialist worldview. Once you get that, you'll be able to see through all the falsities on your own. You won't need to trust anyone. It'll all be down to a correct Marxist view. For me? That happened over years. First when reading Anti-Duhring and Dialectics of Nature for the second time, then when I first read Ilyenkov's doctoral dissertation (which explains Marx's Capital and how it's, according to Lenin, a "textbook" for "the dialectical worldview). Then again when I first started really grasping Hegel. Don't force it. When I first started learning this stuff, the internet wasn't really what it is now. Thank God. Hahaa. But more advice: going around like you're doing, trying to tell everyone else how smart you are and how bad they are, trying to use Marxism as an excuse to show off, that'll come back to bite you big time. Just... be chill. Much easier anyway.

Once upon a time there was a dialectical materialistic spiritualist living contemporaneous to Marx who saw mice running over Shiva Linga. Mushaka pradatta vitandavaad.

Bro I think Lenin had enough to say about Kautsky from 1917 onward. It's possible to know how to win a revolution, and how to lose one. A skill that Kautsky didn't have and that Lenin did, thanks to a proper understanding of dialectical materialism.

dialectical behavioral therapy

The Epstein class and MAGA communists will form a new synthesis, you could say. It's dialectical, you see.

That's actually a thing somewhat. You're probably referring to dialectical thinking but you would need to blame the Greeks for that not Marxism. That being said there's probably a point of difference here because I actually am a strong proponent of dialectics, I just don't really think it's constructive to have continual never-ending culture wars and don't have much of a moral quandary over supporting the "haves."

TESTAMENT - Shadow People (OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO) youtu.be/CsWHa92QuIs?si=1Obk… via @YouTube Esotericism is more interesting than your dialectical materialism of your caste system involving bank accounts to make you special needs as a ho.

He did call us "primitive", "backwards", but ultimately agreed our existence didn't follow "dialectical materialism" & was outside of e*rocentric frameworks of commodification of the land & people You lot really just wanna act as if you're any different than a zionist

There are some psyops for sure. And also shitlords who farm outrage "for the lulz." But sadly, I believe it's mostly genuine, and it's largely a reaction to the various failures of the postwar liberal order and the political-managerial class. It's the ultimate middle finger to "the system." And there's certainly something to the left calling everyone they have the slightest disagreement with a Nazi that waters down and normalizes it. But I think it's mostly a natural consequence of, and reaction to, the left, and whole swaths of the postwar West (in education, media, and practically every Western government to some extent), rejecting equality and classical liberalism in favor of equity, and some flavor of what has been labelled "gay race communism," which I don't have a better name for. If you reject equality and merit, and put your thumb on the scale, there's no convincing argument as to which direction that should go. It's just as easy to make the case to discriminate in favor of "minorities victimized by colonialism" (as reparation) as it is to make the case to discriminate in favor of "white Europeans who brought the light of science and civilization." (as reward) i.e. we should help funnel resources to victim groups because this will help set everyone on equal footing, which is good vs. we should funnel resources to the achieving group and this will help drive further achievement, which is good. (in both cases discrimination is likely to fail in achieving its stated goal, and indeed backfire, while proponents will demand increasingly extreme measures, forever, until the whole rotten mess collapses in on itself) If you reject liberalism, then "gay pride month" (because group victimhood) is no more or less valid than its dialectical opposite in a hypothetical "white pride month" (because group achievement). Most of us, myself included, intuit the former as less bad (if you're conservative, or even as an absolute good if you're a progressive) because our ambient sociological environment is Marxist-colored instead of fascist-colored. But they're really ~equidistant. In some mirror universe where Stalin is secular Satan instead of Hitler, our intuitions might go the other way. Basically: we have an illiberal moral function driving much of society, that disadvantages some groups due to the argument passed into it, where passing a different argument could invert the outcome. Any argument passed in asserts its own own truth. None can be proven or disproven. Is it any wonder why many adversely affected might desire to pass in a different argument? It's one thing to be structurally disadvantaged when times are good and fortunes are rising generally. It's another when times are bad and tides are receding (which is, if not the truth, certainly the overwhelming perception) Why agitate to tip an illiberal function in your favor, as opposed to replacing it with a liberal one? I think to some degree it's easier to substitute an argument than it is to replace the entire function... but I don't think that's a complete explanation. I suspect there's something retributive to it as well.

You don't even know what dialectical materialism is LMFAOOOOOO. And also, not a trot

An Ecological-Generative-Rate Re-Audit of Logical Atomism The Basic Structure of Dialectical Efficacy across 5E Cognition, Enactivism, and Cultural Institutions zenodo.org/records/20711037

isn't this the larping guy who converted to islam cuz he said it was dialectical or something