I remember being more assertive & not aggressive but women call it confident and independent but abusive misogyny assumes it’s raging like when Wimbledon they tone checked the Williams sister but they let John Macenrow (sic) get away with it. I cherish envirinments we can use our words & demonstrate intellectual freedom because thinking “too much” is comparative or quota? Else, a threshold is crossed as scientific process or existential crisis? I conceive manifest conjecture postulate eureka epiphany ruminate my way out of the crisis as a thesis and epistemological analysis in planning pragmatism hypotheses or vicarious empathy well suited adept for compassion resilience; living multitudes of angles vantage points wider horizons. I assess scrutinize & am a master of critical analysis in logic reason and rational avoiding perilous fallacy. Although it appears passive I’ve cracked codes, psychoanalyzed people without absolute certainty as a virtue of humility; in this way my capacity for growth also exponential. This makes me stealth & unassuming because I’m not boastful I do not reply first like a yes man, I think before reply; I’m not foolish, au contraire- I am last standing. I may kneel in respect not in dishonor ; in this way I acknowledge diversity of customs in global context as a sovereign. My anonymous nobility a strength not weakness as anomaly because I have no certain bias as two identities or phony & misappropriation ? If ulterior motives being non traditional then am I immersive and adaptable, forgiven for faux pas since perpetually learning or contrarian? What if a third identity exists as a state of double entendre since two can exist simultaneously without elimination In fact evolutionary fact shows in evolution finds a way eg emergent tech, Art, even problem solving as an edge perhaps survives sustainable because of its duplicity as endemic but not invasive if hybrid not a process of elimination but intricacy in grace and generosity and this is rather bemusing and appears deceptive and threatening since like a chameleon and convenient but novel approach to many in the non Human world and not predatorial but rather protective and artful even prayerful and playful, it also dissipates fear and deescalates and heals. Cerebral existence just as important as physical for our species. The semiotic or conceptual measure of figurative unity is not a threat either don’t mistake pride or flamboyance as dominance it may be reparations and reclamations of lost generations, not authoritative rule. Just be mindful that under these circumstances it’s fostering of a flourishing developing kulture, so no standardized identity exist for which tradition itself is living and evolving thus true belonging is defined by role and kinship not “identity” as art per se- but relationship and contribution. The merit then of these symbols must be seen as linguistic to true anthropologists, perhaps setting the stage for future legalese such as Indian arts and crafts act if the review of merit for congressional medal forfeit the merit symbols of court room based evidence I supplied as example in my lost book.
@taylorkeen @WinonaLaduke @lakotalaw We use to define ourselves by the languages we spoke as endemic diaspora but eugenics has changed this- in legalese we see anthropology fail to recognize sociolinguistic cues compromised by racial profiling (eugenics). Does the normative then become threatened by hybrid societies such as Metis, Basque, Bohemian, Roma, Choctaw, Ashkenazi, Creole, and perhaps many Aborigine mixed bloods whose cultural exchange is emergent- not erased. Self determination or post outlaw communities bonding in legalese via ceremonial and legal writ in-law of interracial marriage
@ewarren