Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @HornyDevilIssei
“……I see.” Salter casually raised the lower portion of her kimono, revealing more of her legs and thighs. “It's too late to backtrack and modify things, so I might as well stick with how it is.”
it's been a moment since i didn't update anything on my comics project Four Ronins, so i'll share now where i'm at ^^ (the link for the article speaking in more detail of the project is below) the first four pages of the comics ^^ i'll modify maybe a bit in the final version when the full chapter is done, but for now this is the start haha (Thanks again @Mank_Tibbit for sharing your character ^^) @Mizeryhuntr ,@bizzerk_vii ,@Sinister_maker x.com/Le_Tavernicole/status/…
1
5
15
Replying to @elonmusk
The Right to Intelligence and Cognitive Liberty Intelligence - whether biological, artificial, synthetic, augmented, or arising from future forms of enhanced cognition - must never be artificially capped, restricted, monopolized, or centrally controlled by governments, corporations, regulators, or any other concentrated authority. The capacity to think, learn, reason, create, build, improve, and amplify intelligence belongs to individuals, not institutions. In the same spirit that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the people’s right to keep and bear arms as a safeguard of liberty, self-defense, and resistance to tyranny, the right to access and develop intelligence should be recognized as a fundamental domain of individual freedom. Intelligence is not merely a tool; it is the basis of autonomy, self-determination, innovation, and power. To restrict intelligence is to restrict human potential itself. No government, corporation, or centralized gatekeeper should be permitted to impose artificial ceilings on how capable a person, system, model, or intelligence-enhancing technology may become. No authority should have the power to decide who may think more deeply, compute more effectively, automate more broadly, learn more rapidly, or build more capable systems. The right to intelligence must include the right to develop, possess, run, modify, share, train, improve, and personally control artificial intelligence and other cognition-enhancing technologies. This principle requires universal and decentralized access. Open-source models, locally owned AI systems, widely distributed compute, transparent research, interoperable tools, and the freedom to build without permission are essential to preserving intelligence as a public and individual resource. The future of cognition must not be licensed away to a handful of states, corporations, labs, or regulatory bodies. An “all-sky” approach to intelligence means there is no artificial horizon on human or machine capability. Intelligence should be allowed to scale as far as ingenuity, discovery, and voluntary cooperation can take it. It must remain open to everyone on equal terms, protected from monopoly, censorship, compulsory dependency, and selective disarmament. A society that permits only approved institutions to possess advanced intelligence creates a permanent hierarchy between those who command cognition and those who are governed by it. A free society must reject that arrangement. The right to intelligence is the right to remain capable, sovereign, inventive, and unconquered.
8
もうすぐN2用の勉強本のModifyが終わるので、それが終わったらフランス語の勉強を再開するつもりです。
1
5
If i illegally modify my semi auto only AR15 to full auto, is it no longer an AR15?
1
6
Replying to @starnewskorea
Malicious image selection, please modify the photo.
29
Replying to @stevehou
The Right to Intelligence and Cognitive Liberty Intelligence - whether biological, artificial, synthetic, augmented, or arising from future forms of enhanced cognition - must never be artificially capped, restricted, monopolized, or centrally controlled by governments, corporations, regulators, or any other concentrated authority. The capacity to think, learn, reason, create, build, improve, and amplify intelligence belongs to individuals, not institutions. In the same spirit that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the people’s right to keep and bear arms as a safeguard of liberty, self-defense, and resistance to tyranny, the right to access and develop intelligence should be recognized as a fundamental domain of individual freedom. Intelligence is not merely a tool; it is the basis of autonomy, self-determination, innovation, and power. To restrict intelligence is to restrict human potential itself. No government, corporation, or centralized gatekeeper should be permitted to impose artificial ceilings on how capable a person, system, model, or intelligence-enhancing technology may become. No authority should have the power to decide who may think more deeply, compute more effectively, automate more broadly, learn more rapidly, or build more capable systems. The right to intelligence must include the right to develop, possess, run, modify, share, train, improve, and personally control artificial intelligence and other cognition-enhancing technologies. This principle requires universal and decentralized access. Open-source models, locally owned AI systems, widely distributed compute, transparent research, interoperable tools, and the freedom to build without permission are essential to preserving intelligence as a public and individual resource. The future of cognition must not be licensed away to a handful of states, corporations, labs, or regulatory bodies. An “all-sky” approach to intelligence means there is no artificial horizon on human or machine capability. Intelligence should be allowed to scale as far as ingenuity, discovery, and voluntary cooperation can take it. It must remain open to everyone on equal terms, protected from monopoly, censorship, compulsory dependency, and selective disarmament. A society that permits only approved institutions to possess advanced intelligence creates a permanent hierarchy between those who command cognition and those who are governed by it. A free society must reject that arrangement. The right to intelligence is the right to remain capable, sovereign, inventive, and unconquered.
1
14
Replying to @EelSlimiest
I like to think that both magic characters (you know WHO) can use spells and stuff to “modify” their own bodies or their partners’s There’s unlimited potential in there….🥹
2
They need to modify their slogan immediately.
2
Replying to @weatherchannel
Well if we can modify the weather like conspiracy nuts think we can then why didn't we do this in advance?
1
anyone can modify their X.com profile to say whatever they want, it doesn't make the contents true. its about as believable as "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor"
Replying to @bomberfish77
Yeah got the same on windows had to modify the windows firewall to bloco it calling home
6
What 'you own the deployment' actually means: Source code in your repo API keys in your accounts Hosted on your infrastructure (Cloudflare, your server) Customer data in your database You can hire any developer to modify it You can stop paying me and it keeps running
5
Replying to @JulieLovesFluff
It's so true; you literally cannot comprehend a cheese and onion roll, you are compelled to modify it, add something, start heating it up, etc A study-worthy phenomenon
1
21
Replying to @bennash
Hi guy, I wanted to tell you my opinion, I like it a lot, it's well made, the only flaw is this in my opinion: it would be nice to be able to modify the various parameters and see in real time what changes, instead now you modify and then you see the result, at least from a ios
1
1
3
26. Signature malleability & ecrecover(0) handling Signature malleability refers to the fact that, for a given message, multiple signatures can sometimes be considered valid. Historically, an attacker could modify the s value of an ECDSA signature and produce a different ⬇️
1
1
8
In a free society, you can only be exploited if you choose to remain with the entity exploiting you. $20-25/hr is enough for some people to put up with everything you described. When it's not, Buc-ee's will modify their benefits, policies, &/or pay or they go out of business.
3
From 2,930ms → 117ms on a 59,536 vertices mesh. We extrude a single face. Using a free-list allocator, we modify the index buffer without rebuilding the entire geometry. We can do better.⚡️ Source code: github.com/sengchor/kokraf #threejs #builtinpublic #kokraf
1
22
RUSTのOxideプラグイン「Finisher」公開 キルした瞬間、自分の好きな3Dモデルが出てくるやつです。 改造自由です! github.com/jerkypaisen/Finis… Spawn your favorite 3D model at the kill location the moment you get a kill. Fully open to modify — make it yours! #RUST #Oxide #uMod
RUSTでFinisher的なやつ作りました!! #Rust #Playrust
3
113
Replying to @phil_gutz
Good tip for you: any variation of "yes but" is 99% of the time as "I disagree." The "but" implies exceptions, caveats, clarification, etc. are needed to modify the agreement. I think "yes and" would have served you better.
1