I don't know who this "Prof Simon" (
@skwirrellmate) is but I do know he instantly 100% disqualified himself from weighing in on the
#MH370x hoax videos with his incredibly dumb and false statements on them and the Corridor Crew response.
1) Nope, 'similar looking' is not an argument. It doesn't matter if you can find or reproduce wave fronts that 'look' similar, what you need to explain is how EVERY FRAME in two videos can be almost perfectly matched to the frames in a 90's VFX shot. And no you dont do that by sloppily pasting the raw effect over the video and drooling "sEe nO mAtCh".
Its not similarity, it is a set of very unique and specific features which defy explanations like chance occurance. 100% debunking the videos.
2) Simons explanation of two 3D objects being behind each other requiring masking and that somehow THIS is the part that makes this impossible for these videos to be CGI/fake is probably the dumbest argument I have heard on this, and boy, I've listened to a lot of Ashton's nonsense.
Most importantly, it is 100% false bullshit and I honestly have no idea what he means here. 3D objects can be rendered behind each other no problem, what the hell do you mean?! I've done this myself in programs like Blender, or seen this in like, I dont know, EVERY 3D VIDEO GAME SINCE THE EARLY 2000's?! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
3) Weird, I could swear that this argument used to be "this is 100% a Citrix mousepointer so this is real" 🧐. I guess we go with whatever the latest LARP explanation from someone on his timeline is.
Videos still fake,
@ashtonforbes still a lying grifter
#DunningKrugerWorldChampions
x.com/JustXAshton/status/187…
Science Filmmaker Prof Simon refutes the Corridor Crew's debunk of the MH370 videos AND adds significant weight to the videos' authenticity.
1. He shows that all blast wave patterns are similar, refuting the assertion that a non-matching stock effect was modified to look like a real wormhole.
2. He explains that objects in 3D space like the orbs traversing the plane and passing through the smoke is extremely difficult to fake, ruling out the hypothesis that a bored kid made the videos. It would require a major production.
3. The cursor in the satellite video is "exactly the same cursor that the NRO use for observations." We noticed a while back that the cursor changes colors depending on the background. This is a HUGE revelation.
Amazing analysis. Of course the videos are real. There's no such thing as fake military videos, let alone two perfectly in sync of a real missing plane, still lost 10 years later.
What people really struggle with is that these videos mean all the institutions they've trusted their entire lives are fraudulent.