Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
@realDonaldTrump so you know how bad the deal you made with Iran is, then, seeing as how it's much worse for us than the previous deal.
.𖥔 vay ݁ ˖ retweeted
🚨INDONESIA AIRPORT NOTICE🚨 [D-2] COERs, Please keep our previous notice in mind and do not come to the airport later, even if you live nearby. Let's respect CORTIS' privacy and be mindful of other travelers as well. The best way to show your love and support is by staying home and saving your energy for Saturday. Let’s give CORTIS the loudest welcome at Allo Bank Festival stage!
1
174
256
3,207
gareth jenkins retweeted
I DID NOT vote for Andy Burnham in the previous two leadership elections. I DID vote for Keir Starmer in the leadership election. I WILL vote for Keir Starmer again. #StickWithStarmer
76
132
725
5,804
KPV☭ retweeted
The previous LDF Govt in Keralam consistently opposed #PMSHRI, challenging its conditional funding clauses legally and politically. However, mounting financial pressures forced them to sign an MoU to release pending dues, a decision that may be seen as a moral compromise.
1
3
11
133
玲音 retweeted
【6/26 Previous Night🌙のお知らせ】 6/27,28の公演は、『B’z LIVE-GYM 2026 -FYOP naked-』 #ArenaBar7 では、Kアリーナでの公演を楽しみにしている方に向けて通常とは一味違った営業を行います。 公演のチケットをお持ちでない方もご来店いただけます! ENTRANCE FREE DJ:宮沢純 , YU-TA DJ TIME:18:00〜22:00 ご来店お待ちしております☄️ #Kアリーナ横浜 #PreviousNight #横浜 #みなとみらい #Bz #LIVEGYM2026 #FYOPnaked
10
26
3,203
Excellent breakdown of the MOU. The author uses examples from Vietnam’s & Afghanistan to point out how this MOU is worse from previous agreements. Also issues that could arise from third parties.
Back in March I wrote 👇 that Iran was winning, and not only strategically but tactically too, but I genuinely didn't expect it would eventually lead - 3 months later - to a complete US surrender. Because, make no mistake, this is what the "deal" that was just signed is: a complete US surrender, the likes of which it has never signed in its entire history. Let's compare it with the 2 other most famous US capitulation agreements: the Paris Peace Accords with Vietnam in 1973 and the Doha Agreement with Afghanistan in 2020. The most significant difference is that both the Vietnam and Afghanistan deals, despite being documents in which the US effectively conceded defeat, contained at least some face-saving provisions for the US. For instance, in the Vietnam deal, North Vietnam accepted the continued existence of the South Vietnamese government, promised peaceful reunification, agreed to maintain the 17th parallel as a dividing line, and accepted international supervision. These were real (if ultimately unenforceable and unenforced) concessions. Same thing with the Taliban: they guaranteed Afghan soil would never again be used to attack America, and agreed to negotiate a political settlement with the then Kabul government. The latter commitment was never seriously pursued - but both existed and gave the US a narrative: at least it could claim its post-9/11 objective had been secured on paper. The deal with Iran is completely different: it doesn't contain a single meaningful concession from Iran. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is merely the reversal of a wartime measure they took in response to the US-Israeli attack. And the "reaffirmation" that Iran won't build nuclear weapons is just this: a reaffirmation of a position Tehran has had for decades. As a reminder, there is a 2003 fatwa by Khamenei that forbids the production and use of any form of weapon of mass destruction, so "reaffirming" it costs Iran exactly nothing. Meanwhile, the list of concessions and costs on the US side is staggering: - Permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon - A US pledge to respect Iran's sovereignty and not interfere in its internal affairs - Full lifting of the naval blockade - Withdrawal of all US forces from the region within 30 days after the final agreement - A $300 billion reconstruction and development fund for Iran - Termination of all sanctions: UN, IAEA, and every unilateral US sanction, primary and secondary - Immediate Treasury waivers for Iranian oil exports and all related banking, insurance, and shipping services - Full release of all frozen Iranian funds and assets, to be spent however Iran's central bank sees fit So very concretely this is the US agreeing to 1) end the war and withdraw its forces, 2) end all hostile measures towards Iran that were in place before the war (the sanctions, the frozen funds, the interference in internal affairs, etc.), and 3) send hundreds of billions of dollars in what are, effectively, war reparations. If that's not a complete surrender, I genuinely don't know what is. And, cherry on the cake, in an absolutely perfect touch of historical irony, Trump literally signed this surrender agreement in Versailles (I'm not kidding: x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/2…). History rhymes, but rarely this loudly, all the more because the historical 1919 Versailles Treaty was also signed in June! Of course, it's fair - very fair, even - to suspect that Trump will not honor this deal. If he's proven anything in his political career, it's that he is agreement-incapable. Plus there's the Israel dimension: the document does say that the war should "end on all fronts, including Lebanon," but Israel has already made clear it considers itself unbound by the agreement. As such, what I suspect will happen - as I wrote the day the MOU was announced (x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/2…) - is that the deal will split in two. The immediate concessions - blockade lifted, oil flowing, funds unfrozen - will happen (some already have) and probably stick, because reversing them would mean restarting the very war the US humiliatingly lost. The deferred provisions - the negotiations on nuclear, the sanctions schedule, the reconstruction fund - will probably enter permanent limbo because, as I wrote then, the US won't get better terms on nuclear after showing they couldn't get them on the battlefield. And given sanctions relief and the $300 billion are tied to a final deal that requires resolving the nuclear question, and the nuclear question requires leverage the US no longer has, the whole structure is circular and never-ending. On the Israel-Lebanon question, things are trickier. Israel, in some way, finds itself in a South Vietnam situation with its patron having negotiated a surrender over its head. The difference is that Thieu was too weak to sabotage the Paris Accords, whereas Netanyahu isn't: his ability to escalate in Lebanon gives him a de facto veto over the deal's most fragile provision. Realistically speaking though, it's hard to imagine the US willing to restart the war, which is its own form of deterrence: if Israel keeps striking Lebanon in violation of the ceasefire, Iran can now retaliate with far greater confidence that the US won't come to the rescue - which ought to give Israel pause. In effect, the end result is that the US security umbrella over Israel just got a lot thinner. Which means that, for the first time in a long time, Israel has to calculate the cost of provoking Iran without assuming the US will absorb the consequences. This points towards restraint, at least for any rational actor. But then again, the same government that dragged the US into this war in the first place has not exactly been a model of strategic rationality... In any case, it's undeniable that Iran has just achieved something no other country has managed, ever: it withstood the full force of the US and Israeli military machines, and extracted a surrender agreement that makes the Paris Peace Accords look like a US victory by comparison. To refer back to the title of my article below 👇: this was the first multipolar war, and Iran has definitely earned its place as one of the poles.
🐉 retweeted
“APC has done a terrible job, this administration and the previous administration are very terrible” – Singer Ycee
D3VID 🐢

110
585
2,333
35,925
#HRInforms DAY 101 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐠-𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬: Comparison of long-term disability claims to previous time period.
1
1
And precisely what has Rupert Lowe’s grooming enquiry actually achieved? What did we learn from it that we didn’t already know from previous investigations? Most of the evidence was already available from the Jay report, what new facts did we uncover? It had no statutory powers, couldn’t compel witnesses, couldn’t require disclosure of documents, couldn’t take evidence under oath, couldn’t make legally binding findings… It was apparently also littered with spelling errors and poor grammar. So other than helping Rupert enhance his profile as an individual (in effect using grooming gangs victims as a marketing tool) what was the actual point of it?.. I wonder why Reform didn’t go ahead with it? Real head scratcher..
2
So technically, @ProteanEgovTech is asking me to raise another grievance coj they couldn't resolve my previous grievances and I took an issue with that. So casual, careless & problematic. You need to do better when u r actually dealing with millions of people's retirement funds.
2
Alabama Dept. of Cosanguinity retweeted
Trump signed his agreement with Iran in Versailles. The previous agreement signed in Versailles led to the bloodiest war in human history and the first ever use of nuclear weapons against civilians. And look, he even signed it in June. What could possibly go wrong?
9
10
84
882
current and previous beta tests and leaks are boring too. they should do novaflare every other patch tbh.
Hsr please give us something to talk about girl drop that SU expansion
2
Teacup Anarchist retweeted
Keir Starmer has described scrapping the two-child benefit cap as his proudest moment as prime minister - despite previously suspending Labour MPs for voting for its removal. Starmer was asked “What have you been most proud of as prime minister?” in an interview with Beth Rigby on Sky News on Wednesday. “Lifting half a million children out of poverty by removing the two-child benefit cap,” he replied. “That is something I’m proud of because that will be felt not just this year, next year, not just during the duration of this government, but for those children it will be felt for the rest of their lives.” However, Starmer’s boast has drawn accusations of hypocrisy from social media users, who have pointed to his previous decision to punish his own MPs for voting for the policy. In July 2024 Starmer withdrew the whip from seven backbench Labour MPs for backing a Scottish National Party amendment calling for the cap to be axed. The amendment was defeated by 363 votes to 103, with rebel MPs John McDonnell, Richard Burgon, Rebecca Long-Bailey, Apsana Begum, Imran Hussain, Ian Byrne and Zarah Sultana all suspended from the Labour party. An additional 42 Labour MPs abstained. The two-child benefit cap was announced by the Conservatives in 2015 and came into law in 2017. The restriction allowed families to only claim universal credit and child tax credit for their first two children, leading to soaring child poverty, according to Resolution Foundation data. After Labour’s victory in July 2024, Starmer and his chancellor Rachel Reeves repeatedly claimed that abolishing the cap was unaffordable. The government officially removed the two-child cap in April this year, following pressure from unions, left-leaning Labour MPs and child poverty campaigners. The policy disproportionately penalised single parents and the working class, with 50% of families affected by the cap living in a one-parent home and at least 57% impacted by the policy having at least one adult in paid work, HMRC statistics found.
3
20
51
2,957
So far, so good! I was swayed by a friend to another brand for my previous pair and just haven't got on with them. I loved my old inov8 so much I wore through the soles 😂 so hoping for good things from these too!
2
Hello Sir /Madam I'll change My Phone Number Because Previous Number Get Lost And I couldn't Find Can U help @JioFinance1 @JioBlackRockmf @JioCare @reliancejio
5
₊˚.⋆⁺₊ retweeted
they fired whoever did those shitty posters the previous spiderman films 😭
8
630
11,204
97,065
📝 May shattered previous activity records in cash equities ... From this peak, activity has accelerated further in June, with volumes this month tracking 9% above May's record! -Citadel Rubner