Chinese 🇨🇳 APT group UNC6508 conducted a 26-month espionage campaign against US 🇺🇸 medical research, academic, and military health institutions, remaining undetected for over a year. The operation combined a REDCap-specific custom implant with a novel Google Workspace email exfiltration technique never previously observed in PRC-nexus actors.
Key technical details:
- INFINITERED malware: 3-part modular implant (dropper, credential harvester, backdoor) injected into REDCap's upgrade pipeline, ensuring persistence across software updates. Backdoor activates via HTTP cookie parameter "REDCAP-TOKEN" and beacons OS, PHP version, DB credentials to attacker C2.
- Credential harvester injects into REDCap's auth file, captures POST-submitted logins, encrypts them, and hides them in a legitimate DB table prefixed with string "xc32038474a".
- Web shell deployed as help[.]php for persistent server access post-initial compromise.
- Attack chain: REDCap legacy version probe, initial compromise Sept. 2023, web shell deployment, credential harvesting over 12 months, then domain admin account takeover.
- Novel TTP: Google Workspace content compliance rule named "Patroit" silently BCC-forwarded keyword-matched emails to BebitaBarefoot774@gmail[.]com. Regex-based, org-wide by default, zero endpoint malware required post-setup.
#DFIR_Radar
🚨 Hot Take:
If you're still using grep for JSON, large codebases, and complex regex...
You're making life harder than it needs to be.
These 4 tools can save hours every week.
The fastest hackers and engineers optimize their workflow first.
Save this one.
#Linux#Developer
Dead-end injection points aren't dead ends if you know where to look.
In our latest Exploits Explained, Synack Red Team researcher @ozgur_bbh walks through a fully blind SQL injection buried inside a PostgreSQL ORDER BY clause, where boolean chaining, time-based techniques, and UNION attacks were all off the table.
His solution? Recognize that regex functions trigger errors PostgreSQL doesn't catch during query planning, isolate them inside a subquery so they only fire on the false branch of a CASE statement, and use the error/success difference as a boolean oracle to extract data character by character.
Check out the full post to learn more 👉 synack.com/exploits-explaine…
Caido v0.57.0 is out. 🎉
The headliners:
- WebSocket in Replay: send WS messages straight from the Replay page.
- Custom Extractors in Automate: pull a regex match into its own results column.
- StreamQL: filter WS messages in WS History.
Plus QoL: Match & Replace now works on WebSockets, filters can go Global across projects, and a new Logging node in Workflows debugs fields without a JS node.
Full Changelog → caido.io/blog/2026-06-05-rel…
Download Now → caido.io/download
API Hacking has never been so easy ... AND free!
github.com/The-XSS-Rat/hackx…
Hackxpert brute has all, and regex scans your responses for exploit patterns - grab your copy now before it sells ou- ... oh right it is FREE!! :D
bir iş için operatörlüğünü yaptığım program ilgili satırları yakalayamıyordu. IT'ciyle takışırken regex kodunu atıp git şu siteden istediğin şekilde düzenle ver demişti en sonunda haahahha
Yeah, we’re in early stages of AI capabilities. Fable’s a toy compared to where AI models are headed. The govt should be paying attention. Hinton said ASI should be illegal. The idea that humans will contain it with some regex guardrails isn’t logical. We’re rapidly approaching a tipping point.
reddit.com/r/pihole/comments…
Senin söylediğinin teorik olarak imkanı şu an yok
Regex de yazsan domainleri tek tek milyon tane domain eklesen de kurallara benzersiz sayı ve rakamlarla linkler gelecektir
*youtube.com veya youtube.com/ads olsa dediğin haklı tamamen siteyi engelleyebilirsin ama site içerisindeki reklamları engelleyemezsin bunu şu an kimse yapamaz pi hole forumlarını oku istersen
Regex kurallarını sana yollayayım istiyorsan:)
youtube.com reklamları için bana regex kurallarını at bakalım
Sadece kendi oluşturduğum 400'ünden fazla regex kuralı var
Buna rağmen youtubeyi yine engeleyemezsin
At kendi kurallarını pi hole sunucuma yükleyeyim
youtube.com/api/stats/qoe?fm…
sadece bir tane istek bu bunun gibi 600 tane istek için nasıl bir regex kuralı yazabilirsin ?
Kardeşim bunu daha başarabilen biri yok ne github üzerinde ne reddit üzerinde ne diğer geliştiriciler o yüzden Pi-hole tarayıcı eklentisi veya patchlenmiş uygulama başka bir yöntemi yolu asla yok şu an böyle
Pi-hole dökümantasyonunu iyi okumanızı tavsiye ederim klasik dns engellemeye ek olarak regex kural oluşturabiliyorsunuz. ublock ta farklı birşey yapmıyor zaten.
Bookmarked:
Most local AI users never touch the engine underneath Ollama.
llama.cpp exposes six families of knobs you cannot reach through a wrapper.
The useful one is structured output: feed it a GBNF grammar or JSON schema, and the model physically cannot output invalid JSON. No regex retries.
Another is the ngl flag. It offloads layers to GPU. You can run a 70B model on an 8GB card by keeping most layers on CPU.
That hybrid trick alone makes direct llama.cpp worth learning.
youtube.com/watch?v=DadmyNgM…#video#ai
same! fastest way to skip it that i found was using `browser.declarativeNetRequest.onRuleMatchedDebug`
and this ungodly regex: ^https?:\/\/(?:[a-z0-9-] \.)*google(?:\.[a-z]{2,}){1,}\/url\?(?:[^&]*&)*(?:url|q)=<target> with browser.declarativeNetRequest.updateDynamicRules
Guys, I ended up using a hybrid parser:
local regex parser first, then CommandCode LLM function/tool calling as fallback.
The LLM does not query the DB directly.
It produces structured filters through tool calling, then my backend searches pets with normal TypeORM database queries plus haversine distance filtering.
Need help!
Let’s say I have DB of 10k pets, in different states and different types.
My app users want a feature where instead of manually adding search filters they just want to do a prompt like “Give me brown huskies in Texas not more than 2 years old” and get the results.
I know ChatGPT API key can do it but what are my most cost effective and practical options?
Regex match counting tip: the “obvious” way most .NET devs do it is slower and allocates memory it doesn’t need to.
There’s a cleaner, faster approach hiding in plain sight.
Benchmarks don’t lie. Your hot paths will thank you.
#dotnet10#MVPBuzzdotnettips.wordpress.com/202…
📌 개발자 "가장 빨리" 취업하는 법 정리 ( 깃허브 AI로 꾸밀 때 함정, 수치까지)
리퍼럴(referral, 사내 추천 = 내부 직원이 당신을 찍어 추천) : 미국 기준 전체 채용의 30~50%가 추천으로 채워짐 (지원서 중 추천 비율은 6~7%인데 채용의 30~40%를 먹음)
추천의 진짜 힘 : 추천 후보는 일반 지원자보다 약 5배 더 뽑힘, 채용 속도도 빨라짐 (추천 약 29일 vs 일반 약 39일)
코딩 테스트(coding test, 알고리즘 1차 관문) : 대기업 기술 채용의 거의 필수 통과 의례
깃허브 AI 꾸미기 함정 : "이 코드 뭐 하는 거예요?"에 못 답하면 면접에서 바로 들통남
핵심 반전 : 빠른 취업은 스펙 추가가 아니라 "뽑는 사람의 리스크를 줄여주는 것"
💬 개발자로 가장 빨리 취업하는 길은 스펙 한 줄 더 늘리는 게 아니라 리퍼럴을 뚫는 거다.
왜냐하면 숫자가 이미 말해준다 — 지원서 중 추천은 6~7%뿐인데 실제 채용의 30~40%를 차지하고, 추천 후보는 일반 지원자보다 약 5배 더 뽑힌다(출처마다 편차 있음). 면접관 입장에선 "검증된 사람"이라 안전한 카드거든 (면접관도 미스 채용 책임지기 싫은 월급쟁이다).
그래서 순서는 1) 안에서 추천해줄 사람 만들기 2) 코딩 테스트 감각 3) 깃허브에 "끝까지 굴러가는" 프로젝트 & 이 셋이 겹치면 속도가 확 붙는다.
근데 요즘 깃허브를 AI로 후딱 꾸미는데 주의 — 1) 잔디(커밋 그래프) 자동 채우기는 면접관도 다 안다 2) 내가 못 읽는 AI 코드는 "여기 왜 regex 썼어요?" 한 방에 무너진다(실제로 Canva, Meta 면접은 생성 코드마다 "이거 뭐 하는 거냐"를 묻는다고 한다) 3) AI로 찍어낸 프로젝트는 죄다 비슷해서 차별화가 안 된다 (남들도 똑같은 투두앱).
반면에 AI를 "도구"로 쓰고 결과를 내가 완전히 이해하면 오히려 가산점일 수도 있다 — 들키는 건 AI 사용 자체가 아니라 "이해 없는 사용"이니까. 명언처럼 설명 못 하면 소유한 게 아니다.
안 믿겨도 괜찮다. 출처 셋 다 열어보면 된다. → 추천이 채용의 30~40%인 근거: 리퍼럴 통계 → 면접관이 AI 코드를 어떻게 잡는지: 기술 면접 AI 탐지 가이드 → 추천보다 강한 증거 만들기: 깃허브 공식 문서
#개발자취업#코딩테스트#깃허브
🔗 출처:
Employee Referral Statistics — zippia.com/advice/employee-r…
How to Detect AI Use in Technical Interviews (Karat) — karat.com/detect-ai-use-tech…
GitHub Docs — docs.github.com/
Three things I believe about AI gateways in 2026:
1 - if your gateway doesn't know whether the response was hallucinated, it's a load balancer with a billing dashboard.
2 - guardrails built on regex are a 2023 idea. The actual primitives now are extraction pipelines, classifier calls, and grounded eval scores. If your "PII detection" is a list of patterns, you're protecting against the 2019 attacker.
3 - the gateway, the eval engine, and the agent runtime want to be the same system. Not three vendors with REST APIs to each other. Same trace. Same context. Same decision graph.
Building toward that with Agent Command Center. Apache 2.0, Go-based, Anthropic, OpenAI-compatible. The repo is the argument; the link- github.com/future-agi/future…
Tell me which of the three I have wrong.