i mean, this is pointless because even if the 3 of us agree, it's the "biased" POV of ppl who've been into this professionally hence they're aware of the nuances VS an opinion of a spectator that generalizes the lower quality side of the service to rep the whole thing
because thing is that when the quality is up to the right standards, you can't really tell if it's a replyguy hence you wouldn't reach to this conclusion