My preliminary observation is this.
@johnrobb uses a psycho-sociological substrate to understand how networks are formed underneath the formal structure and governance (onstitutions, nations, etc).
Verna Allee used the same substrat to understand intangibles flowing between firms, unbeknownst to corporate managers.
@VRSS talks about superstructures, which form the magma behind what's formal, measured, organized. He speaks about deep culture and natural human predispositions, the same stuff. Vini is the only guy I know who masters what I call analog or organic p2p. On other words, he's after these p2p human dynamics, seing humans as complex beings, engaged in complexity doing, forming relationships based on their human predispositions, forming networks that escape the institutional lens.
What I see here is people becoming more conscious of the deep roots of an emerging p2p society. The social global network is reshaping, feeding from this magma, escaping the institutional lens. This global network is becoming conscious itself. This will lead to reonstitutionalization during a consolidation phase, seeking efficiency. The magma will remain what it is, unknowable, unshaved, constantly moving, underneath everything else, from where future change will emerge. Today it is giving shape to a network society.
@mbauwens new posts about trans-local networks, diaspora, etc. go in the same direction, are on the same pattern. These are networks built, shaped on the same substrate.
I see an acceleration of the emergence of a p2p society.
And we all need to realize that we're expressing the same structures at different layers. Us, Sensorica we talk about open value networks, at the economic level. John is at the political and geopolitical level. Michel is at the societal level. We all see the same things, at different levels.
My contribution here is to draw our attention to that.